skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037436acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Visual reporting in time-critical work: exploring video use in emergency response

Published:30 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on an explorative project aimed to study the use of live video technology in emergency response work. The initial stage of the project aimed at enabling an emergency response organization with live video capabilities. The study covered the steps of design, development and deployment of an application for live video broadcasting. Over a 10 months period, professional responders has used the application in over 200 incidents. The study shows how short video sequences are produced as an embedded activity in order to capture small fragments of work rather than creating a complete coverage of an incident. Further, this study also shows how broadcasted video is incorporated into the work at the command center as visual reports, which open up for collective negotiations of the broader meaning of a situation.

References

  1. Anderson, A. H., Smallwood, L., MacDonald, R., Mullin, J., Fleming, A., O' Malley, C. (2000). Video data and video links in mediated communication: what do users value?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 1, (2000) p. 165--187 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bergstrand, F. and Landgren, J. Information sharing using live video in emergency response work. In Proc. ISCRAM 2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blomberg, J. L., & Henderson, A. Reflections on participatory design: lessons from the trillium experience. In Proc. CHI 1990, ACM Press (1990), 353--360 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Camp, P. J., Hudson, J. M., Keldorph, R.. Lewis, S., Mynatt, E. D. Supporting communication and collaboration practices in safety-critical situations. In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 249--250 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Calloway, L. J. & Keen. P. G. W. Organizing for crisis response. Journal of Information Technology 11(1), 13--27Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dourish, P. and Bly, S. Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In Proc. CHI 1992, ACM Press (1992), 541--547 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dunn, J. C., Lewandowsky, S., & Kirsner, K. Dynamics of communication in emergency management. Applied Cognitive Psychology (2002), 16(6), 719--737Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Engström, A., Esbjörnsson, M., and Juhlin, O. 2008. Mobile collaborative live video mixing. In Proc. of MobileHCI '08, ACM Press (2008), 157--166 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Engström, A., Juhlin, O., Perry, M., and Broth, M. Temporal hybridity: footage with instant replay in real time. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), p. 1495--1504 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Design: Cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gaver, W., Sellen, A., Heath, C. and Luff, P. One is not enough: Multiple views in a media space. In Proc. INTERACT '93, ACM Press (1993), 335--341 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Heath, C. and Luff, P. Disembodied conduct: communication through video in a multi-media office environment. In Proc. CHI 1991, ACM Press (1991), 99--103 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Heath, C. and Luff, P. Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11(1--2), (1992), 69--95Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., Benford, S., and Greenhalgh, C. Fragmented interaction: establishing mutual orientation in virtual environments. In Proc. of CSCW 1998, ACM Press (1998), 217--226 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hughes, J. A., D. Randall, D. Shapiro. Faltering from ethnography to design. In Proc. CSCW 1992, ACM Press (1992), 115--122 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jiang, X., Hong, JI., Takayama, LA., & Landay, JA. Ubiquitous Computing for Firefighters: Field Studies and Prototypes of Large Displays for Incident Command. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 679--686 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Juhlin, O., Engström, A., & Reponen, E. Mobile Broadcasting --- The Whats and Hows of Live Video as a Social Medium. In Proc. MobileHCI'10, ACM Press (2010), 35--44 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kensing, F. Methods and Practices in Participatory Design. ITU-Press (2003), Copenhagen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Harper, R., Wood, K. Understanding videowork. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 61--70 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., and Siegel, J. Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction 18(1), ACM Press (2003), 13--49 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kristensen, M., Kyng, M., Palen, L. (2006). Participatory design in emergency medical service: designing for future practice. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 161--170 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kyng, M., Toftdal Nielsen, E., & Kristensen, M. Challenges in designing interactive systems for emergency response. In Proc. Designing Interactive systems (2006), 301--310 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Landgren, J. Making action visible in time-critical work. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 201--210 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Landgren, J and Nulden, U. A study of emergency response work: Patterns of mobile Phone Interaction. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2007), 1323--1332 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Marcus, A. & Gasperini, J. Almost dead on arrival: a case study of non-user-centered design for a police emergency-response system. Interactions 13(5), ACM Press (2006). 12--18 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mogensen, P., & Trigg, R. H. (1992). Artefacts as triggers for participatory design. In Proc. Participatory Design Conference 1992, 55--62Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Orlikowski, W. J. The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science 3(3), (1992), pp. 398--427Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Orr, J. Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pan, Z. and Ngo, C. Structuring Home Video by Snippet Detection and Pattern Parsing. In Proc. MIR'04, ACM Press (2004), 69--76 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Perry, M., Juhlin, O., Esbjörnsson, M., Engstrom, A. Lean Collaboration Through Video Gestures: Coordinating the production of live televised sport. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2009), 2279--2288 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pica, D. & Sorensen, C. (2005). Tales from the police: Rhythms of interaction with mobile technologies. Information and Organization, 15(2), 125--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Puikkonen, A., Häkkilä, J., Ballagas, R., and Mäntyjärvi, J. Practices in creating videos with mobile phones. In Proc. MobileHCI 2009. ACM Press (2009), 1--10 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Turoff, M., Chumer, M., Van de Walle, B., Yao, X. (2004) The Design of Emergency Response Management Information Systems. JITTA, 5(4), 1--35Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Weick, K. E. Cosmos vs. Chaos: Sense and nonsense in electronic contexts. Organizational Dynamics (1985), 51--64Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Whittaker, S. and Amento, B. Seeing What You Are Hearing. In Proc. ECSCW 2003, ACM Press (2003), 219--238 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Whittaker, S. Things to Talk About When Talking About Things. Human-Computer Interaction (2003), 18(1), 149--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yan, W. and Kankanhalli M. S. Detection and Removal of Lighting & Shaking Artifacts in Home Videos. In Proc. Multimedia'02, ACM Press (2002), 107--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Visual reporting in time-critical work: exploring video use in emergency response

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Other conferences
                  MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
                  August 2011
                  781 pages
                  ISBN:9781450305419
                  DOI:10.1145/2037373

                  Copyright © 2011 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 30 August 2011

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader