skip to main content
10.1145/2047196.2047243acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Clip-on gadgets: expanding multi-touch interaction area with unpowered tactile controls

Published:16 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtual keyboards and controls, commonly used on mobile multi-touch devices, occlude content of interest and do not provide tactile feedback. Clip-on Gadgets solve these issues by extending the interaction area of multi-touch devices with physical controllers. Clip-on Gadgets use only conductive materials to map user input on the controllers to touch points on the edges of screens; therefore, they are battery-free, lightweight, and low-cost. In addition, they can be used in combination with multi-touch gestures. We present several hardware designs and a software toolkit, which enable users to simply attach Clip-on Gadgets to an edge of a device and start interacting with it.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

fp327.mp4

mp4

21.9 MB

References

  1. Baudisch, P. and Chu, G. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In Proc. CHI 2009. 1923--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Block, F., Haller, M., Gellersen, H., Gutwin, C., and Billinghurst, M. VoodooSketch -- extending interactive surfaces with adaptable interface palettes. In Proc. of TEI 2008, 55--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brewster, S. and Chohan, F., and Brown, L. Tactile Feedback for Mobile Interactions, Ext. Abstracts CHI 2007, 159--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fukumoto, M. and Sugimura, T. Active Click: Tactile Feedback for Touch Panels, Ext. Abstracts CHI 2001, 121--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gohlke, K., Hlatky, M., Helse, S. and Loviscach, J. FlexiKnobs: bridging the gap between mouse interaction and hardware controllers. In Proc. TEI 2010, 241 -- 24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hermitage Nouso: Tactile+Plus.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. http://game.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/series/ggl/20101102_404249.html..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hiraoka, S., Miyamoto, I. and Tomimatsu, K. Behind Touch, a Text Input Method for Mobile Phones by The Back and Tactile Sense Interface. Information Processing Society of Japan, Interaction 2003,131--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Karlson, A., Bederson, B., Contreras-Vidal, J. (2006) Understanding Single-Handed Mobile Device Interaction. Tech Report HCIL-2006-02, Computer Science Dept., University of Marylan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Klemmer, R.S., Li, J., Lin, J., and Landay J.A. Papier-Mache: toolkit support for tangible input. In Proc. CHI 2004, 399--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Koskinen, E., Kaaresoja, T. and Laitinen, P. Feel-good touch: finding the most pleasant tactile feedback for a mobile touch screen button. In Proc. ICMI 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 1Li, K., Baudisch, P. and Hinckley, K. BlindSight: eyes-free access to mobile phones. In Proc. CHI 2008, 1389--1398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W. Text entry for mobile computing: Models and methods, theory and practice. Human-Computer Interaction 17 (2). Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002, 147--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mangen, A. and Velay J.L. Digitizing Literacy: Reflections on the Haptics of Writing. In Journal of Advances in Haptics (2010), 385--401.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nashel, A. and Razzaque, S. Tactile Virtual Buttons for Mobile Devices, Ext. Abstracts CHI 2003, 854--855. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Potter, R., Weldon, L. and Shneiderman, B. Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies. In Proc. CHI 1988, 27--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Poupyrev, I. Maruyama, S. and Rekimoto, J. Ambient touch: designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices. In Proc. UIST 2002, 51--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rekimoto, J. Ullmer, B. and Oba, H. DataTiles: a modular platform for mixed physical and graphical interactions. In Proc. of CHI 2001, 269--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Senseg E-Sense® solution.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. http:// http://senseg.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Siek, K.A., Rogers, Y. and Connelly, K.H. Fat Finger Worries: How Older and Younger Users Physically Interact with PDAs. In Proc. INTERACT 2005, 267--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sugimoto, M. and Hiroki, K.. HybridTouch: an intuitive manipulation technique for PDAs using their front and rear surfaces. In Proc. MobileHCI 2006, 137--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sun, X., Plocher, T. and Qu, W. An Empirical Study on the Smallest Comfortable Button/Icon Size on Touch Screen. Usability and Internationalization, Part I, HCII 2007, LNCS 4559, 615--621, 200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ten One Design: Fling analog joystick. http://tenonedesign.com/flin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Vogel, D. and Baudisch, P. Shift: A Technique for Operating Pen-Based Interfaces Using Touch. In Proc. CHI 2007, 657--666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Weiss, M., Wagner, J., Jennings, R., Jansen, Y., Khoshabeh, R., Hollan, D.J. and Borchers, J. SLAP widgets: bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops. In Proc. of CHI 2009, 3229--3234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wobbrock, J.O., Myers, B.A. and Aung, H.H. The performance of hand postures in front- and back-of-device interaction for mobile computing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2008, 857--875. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Yu, N.H., Chan, L.W., Lau, S.Y., Tsai, S.S., Hsiao, I.C., Tsai, D.J., Cheng, L.P., Hsiao, F.I., Chen, M.Y., Huang, P. and Hung, Y.P. TUIC: Enabling Tangible Interaction on Capacitive Multi-touch Display. To appear in Proc. CHI 201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zimmerman, D.T., Smith, R.J., Paradiso, A.J., Allport, D. and Gershenfeld, N. Applying electric field sensing to human-computer interfaces. In Proc. of CHI 1995, 280--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Clip-on gadgets: expanding multi-touch interaction area with unpowered tactile controls

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UIST '11: Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
        October 2011
        654 pages
        ISBN:9781450307161
        DOI:10.1145/2047196

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 October 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        UIST '11 Paper Acceptance Rate67of262submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        UIST '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader