skip to main content
10.1145/2069618.2069663acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Shared mental models in improvisational theatre

Published:03 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article presents our currents findings from an empirical study of the cognition employed by performers in improvisational theatre. Improvised theatrical performance is an activity in which one or more individuals create a dramatic or comedic performance in real-time and is an interesting example of creative, real-time, collaborative problem solving. Unlike other forms of creative problem solving, improvisers are constrained from explicitly coordinating with the other improvisers on stage or revising their decisions after the fact. This article focuses on the means by which a group of improvisers converge on a shared understanding (i.e. a shared mental model) of what a scene is about and how it should proceed. We present our findings on how improvisers build shared mental models during a performance and discuss our applications of these findings to the design and development of improvisational intelligent agents.

References

  1. Bakeman, R., and J.M. Gottman, Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis, Cambridge Univ Pr, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Baron, R.S. So right it's wrong: Groupthink and the ubiquitous nature of polarized group decision making. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 37, 2005, p. 219--253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., and Converse, S. "Shared mental models in expert team decision-making," Environmental Effects of Cognitive Abilities, 2001, p. 221--245.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, H.H., and Schaefer, E.F. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 13, 1989, p. 259--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Donnellon, A., Gray, B., and Bougon, M.G. Communication, meaning, and organized action. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 31, 1986, p. 43--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jackson, S.L., Krajcik, J., and Soloway, E. The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1998, p. 187--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Janis, I.L. Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes, Houghton Mifflin Boston, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnstone, K. Impro for Storytellers, Routledge, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnstone, K. Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre, Routledge, 198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Levesque, L.L., Wilson, J.M., and Wholey, D.R. Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 22, 2001, pp. 135--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 1Limb, C.J., and Braun, A.R. Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: an FMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS One, vol. 3, 2008, p. e1679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Magerko, B., Dohogne, P., and DeLeon, C. Employing Fuzzy Concepts for Digital Improvisational Theatre. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual International Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference (Palto Alto CA, 2011), AAAI Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Magerko, B., Manzoul, W., Riedl, M., Baumer, A., Fuller, D., Luther, K., and Pearce, C. An Empirical Study of Cognition and Theatrical Improvisation. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Berkely CA, 2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mathieu, J.E., Heffner, T.S., Goodwin, G.F., Salas, E., and Cannon-Bowers, J.A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 85, 2000, pp. 273--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Mendonça, D.J., and Wallace, W.A. A cognitive model of improvisation in emergency management. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 37, 2007, p. 547--561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mendonça, D.J., and Wallace, W.A. Cognition in Jazz Improvisation: An Exploratory Study. Chicago, IL: 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitroff, I.I., and Emshoff, J.R. On strategic assumption-making: a dialectical approach to policy and planning. Academy of Management Review, vol. 4, 1979, p. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Mohammed, S. Toward an Understanding of Cognitive Consensus in a Group Decision-Making Context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 37, Dec. 2001, pp. 408--425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mohammed, S., and Ringseis, E. Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 85, Jul. 2001, pp. 310--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sawyer, R.K. Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation, Ablex Publishing Corporation, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Seddon, F.A. Modes of Communication During Jazz Improvisation. British Journal of Music Education, vol. 22, 2005, pp. 47--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Spolin, V. Improvisation for the theater: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques, Northwestern Univ Pr, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Traum, "Computational models of grounding in collaborative systems," working notes of AAAI Fall Symposium on Psychological Models of Communication, 1999, p. 124--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Vertzberger, Y. The world in their minds: Information processing, cognition, and perception in foreign policy decisionmaking, Stanford Univ Pr, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yokochi, S., and Okada, T. Creative Cognitive Process of Art Making: A Field Study of a Traditional Chinese Ink Painter. Creativity Research Journal, vol. 17, 2005, pp. 241--255..Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Shared mental models in improvisational theatre

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        C&C '11: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition
        November 2011
        492 pages
        ISBN:9781450308205
        DOI:10.1145/2069618
        • General Chair:
        • Ashok K. Goel,
        • Program Chairs:
        • Fox Harrell,
        • Brian Magerko,
        • Yukari Nagai,
        • Jane Prophet

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader