skip to main content
10.1145/2070481.2070552acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Service-oriented autonomic multimodal interaction in a pervasive environment

Published:14 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Heterogeneity and dynamicity of pervasive environments require the construction of flexible multimodal interfaces at run time. In this paper, we present how we use an autonomic approach to build and maintain adaptable input multimodal interfaces in smart building environments. We have developed an autonomic solution relying on partial interaction models specified by interaction designers and developers. The role of the autonomic manager is to build complete interaction techniques based on runtime conditions and in conformity with the predicted models. The sole purpose here is to combine and complete partial models in order to obtain an appropriate multimodal interface. We illustrate our autonomic solution by considering a running example based on an existing application and several input devices.

References

  1. 1992. A metamodel for the runtime architecture of an interactive system: the UIMS tool developers workshop. SIGCHI Bull. 24, 1 (Jan. 1992), 32--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bardin, J., Lalanda, P., Escoffier, C. 2010. Towards an Automatic Integration of Heterogeneous Services and Devices. Proc. of APSCC'10. IEEE, 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bouchet, J., Nigay, L., Ganille, T. 2004. ICARE software components for rapidly developing multimodal interfaces. Proc. of ICMI'04. ACM, 251--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dumas, B., Lalanne, D., Ingold R. 2009. HephaisTK: A Toolkit for Rapid Prototyping of Multimodal Interfaces. Proc. of ICMI-MLMI 2009. ACM 231--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Escoffier, C., Hall, R. S., Lalanda, P. 2007. iPOJO: an Extensible Service-Oriented Component Framework. Proc. of SCC'07. IEEE, 474--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. France, R., Rumpe, B. 2007. Model-driven Development of Complex Software: A Research Roadmap. Proc. of FOSE'07. IEEE, 37--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Garcia, I., Pedraza, G., Debbabi, B., Lalanda, P., Hamon, C. 2010. Towards a service mediation framework for dynamic applications. Proc. of APSCC'10. IEEE, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Garlan, D., Cheng, S. W., Huang, A. C., Schmerl, B., Steenkiste, P. 2004. Rainbow: Architecture-Based Self Adaptation with Reusable Infrastructure. IEEE Computer 37, 10 (Oct. 2004), 46--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Huebscher, M. C., McCann, J. A. 2008. A survey of autonomic computing. ACM Comput. Surv. 40, 3, Article 7 (Aug. 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. IBM Corporation. An Architectural Blueprint for Autonomic Computing. http://www-03.ibm.com/autonomic/pdfs/ AC20Blueprint20White20Paper20V7.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. König, W. A., Rädle, R., Reiterer, H. 2009. Squidy: a zoomable design environment for natural user interfaces. Proc. of CHI EA'09. ACM, 4561--4566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lalanda, P., Bellissard, L., Balter, R. 2006. Asynchronous Mediation for Integrating Business and Operational Processes. IEEE Internet Computing 10, 1 (Jan. 2006), 56--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Oviatt, S. 2003. Advances in Robust Multimodal Interface Design. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 23, 5 (Sept. 2003), 62--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Oviatt, S. 2007. Multimodal interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications, 2nd edition. L. Erlbaum Assoc. Inc., Chap. 14, 286--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Papazoglou, M. P., Georgakopoulos, D. 2003. Service-Oriented Computing: Introduction. Commun. ACM 46, 10 (Oct. 2003), 24--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Satyanarayanan, M. 2001. Pervasive computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Personal Communications, 8, 4 (Aug. 2001), 10--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Serrano, M., et al.. 2008. The openinterface framework: a tool for multimodal interaction. Proc. of CHI EA'08. ACM, 3501--3506. www.oi-project.org Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Serrano, M., Juras, D., Nigay, L. 2008. A three-dimensional characterization space of software components for rapidly developing multimodal interfaces. Proc.of ICMI'08. ACM, 149--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Serrano, M., Nigay, L. 2009. Temporal aspects of CARE-based multimodal fusion. Proc. of ICMI-MLMI'09. ACM, 177--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Weiser, M. 1991. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265, 3 (Sept. 1991), 66--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Service-oriented autonomic multimodal interaction in a pervasive environment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICMI '11: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces
      November 2011
      432 pages
      ISBN:9781450306416
      DOI:10.1145/2070481

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 November 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader