skip to main content
10.1145/2024156.2024219acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessiggraph-asiaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conjoining Gestalt rules for abstraction of architectural drawings

Published:12 December 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a method for structural summarization and abstraction of complex spatial arrangements found in architectural drawings. The method is based on the well-known Gestalt rules, which summarize how forms, patterns, and semantics are perceived by humans from bits and pieces of geometric information. Although defining a computational model for each rule alone has been extensively studied, modeling a conjoint of Gestalt rules remains a challenge. In this work, we develop a computational framework which models Gestalt rules and more importantly, their complex interactions. We apply conjoining rules to line drawings, to detect groups of objects and repetitions that conform to Gestalt principles. We summarize and abstract such groups in ways that maintain structural semantics by displaying only a reduced number of repeated elements, or by replacing them with simpler shapes. We show an application of our method to line drawings of architectural models of various styles, and the potential of extending the technique to other computer-generated illustrations, and three-dimensional models.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Adabala, N., Varma, M., Toyama, K., and Bangalore, S. N. 2007. Computer aided generation of stylized maps. Comp. Anim. Virtual Worlds 18, 133--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Adabala, N. 2009. Building representation in oblique-view maps of modern urban areas. Cartographic Journal 46, 2, 104--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Barla, P., Thollot, J., and Sillion, F. X. 2005. Geometric clustering for line drawing simplification. In In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barla, P., Breslav, S., Thollot, J., Sillion, F. X., and Markosian, L. 2006. Stroke pattern analysis and synthesis. Comp. Graph. Forum 25, 3, 663--671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Belongie, S., Malik, J., and Puzicha, J. 2002. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24, 509--522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cao, F., Delon, J., Desolneux, A., Muse, P., and Sur, F. 2007. A unified framework for detecting groups and application to shape recognition. J Math Imaging Vis 27, 91--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Claessens, P., and Wagemans, J. 2008. A bayesian framework for cue integration in multistable grouping: Proximity, collinearity, and orientation priors in zigzag lattices. Journal of Vision 8, 4, 33:1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cole, F., Golovinskiy, A., Limpaecher, A., Barros, H., Finkelstein, A., Funkhouser, T., and Rusinkiewicz, S. 2008. Where do people draw lines? In ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 papers, ACM, 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cole, F., Sanik, K., DeCarlo, D., Finkelstein, A., Funkhouser, T., Rusinkiewicz, S., and Singh, M. 2009. How well do line drawings depict shape? In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 28, ACM, 28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. DeCarlo, D., and Santella, A. 2002. Stylization and abstraction of photographs. In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 21, ACM, 769--776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Delong, A., Osokin, A., Isack, H. N., and Boykov, Y. 2010. Fast approximate energy minimization with label costs. In CVPR, 2173--2180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Desolneux, A., Moisan, L., and michel Morel, J. 2002. Gestalt theory and Computer Vision.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Drori, I., Cohen-Or, D., and Yeshurun, H. 2003. Fragment-based image completion. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH 2003, 303--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Elder, J. H., and Goldberg, R. M. 2002. Ecological statistics of gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. Journal of Vision, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Feldman, J. 2003. Perceptual grouping by selection of a logically minimal model. International Journal of Computer Vision 55, 1, 5--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Glander, T., and Dllner, J. 2009. Abstract representations for interactive visualization of virtual 3d city models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 33, 5, 375--387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Glander, T., and Döllner, J. 2008. Techniques for generalizing building geometry of complex virtual 3d city models. In Advances in 3D Geoinformation Systems, Springer, P. van Oosterom, S. Zlatanova, F. Penninga, and E. M. Fendel, Eds., Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 381--400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Grabler, F., Agrawala, M., Sumner, R. W., and Pauly, M. 2008. Automatic generation of tourist maps. ACM Trans. Graph. 27 (August), 100:1--100:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Grabli, S., Durand, F., and Sillion, F. 2004. Density measure for line-drawing simplification. In Proceedings of Pacific Graphics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hurtut, T., Landes, P., Thollot, J., Gousseau, Y., Drouillhet, R., and Coeurjolly, J. 2009. Appearance-guided synthesis of element arrangements by example. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, ACM, 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ijiri, T., Mech, R., Igarashi, T., and Miller, G. 2008. An Example-based Procedural System for Element Arrangement. In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 27, Wiley Online Library, 429--436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanizsa, G. 1980. Grammatica del Vedere.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kubovy, M., and van den Berg, M. 2008. The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: A probabilistic model of grouping by proximity and similarity in regular patterns. Psychological Review 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu, Y., Collins, R. T., and Tsin, Y. 2004. A computational model for periodic pattern perception based on frieze and wallpaper groups. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26, 3, 354--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Loya, A., Adabala, N., Das, A., and Mishra, P. 2008. A practical approach to image-guided building facade abstraction. In Computer Graphics International 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mehra, R., Zhou, Q., Long, J., Sheffer, A., Gooch, A., and Mitra, N. J. 2009. Abstraction of man-made shapes. ACM Transactions on Graphics 28, 5, 137:1--137:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mi, X., DeCarlo, D., and Stone, M. 2009. Abstraction of 2D shapes in terms of parts. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, ACM, 15--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mitra, N. J., Chu, H.-K., Lee, T.-Y., Wolf, L., Yeshurun, H., and Cohen-Or, D. 2009. Emerging images. ACM Transactions on Graphics 28, 5 (December), 163:1--163:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Shesh, A., and Chen, B. 2008. Efficient and dynamic simplification of line drawings. Comput. Graph. Forum 27, 2, 537--545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Sidiropoulos, G., and Vasilakos, A. 2006. Ultra-real or symbolic visualization? the case of the city through time. Computers & Graphics 30, 2, 299--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wang, J., Xu, Y., Shum, H.-Y., and Cohen, M. F. 2004. Video tooning. ACM Trans. Graph. 23 (August), 574--583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wertheimer, M. 1923. Untersuchungen zur lehre der gestalt ii,. Psychol. Forsch., 4, 301--350. Translation published as Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms, in: W. Ellis, A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1938, pp. 71--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Conjoining Gestalt rules for abstraction of architectural drawings

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SA '11: Proceedings of the 2011 SIGGRAPH Asia Conference
        December 2011
        730 pages
        ISBN:9781450308076
        DOI:10.1145/2024156

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 December 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate178of869submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader