skip to main content
10.1145/2074712.2074734acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

'Make it move': playing cause and effect games with a robot companion for children with cognitive disabilities

Published:24 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Play is one of the most important activities in child development. Children with special needs are often excluded from play activities due to the nature of their impairments.

This paper describes the use of two types of robots with very different configurations, one humanoid robot (KASPAR) and one mobile robotic platform (IROMEC), in a six month long-term study with children with different levels of cognitive and social disabilities.

In this study we tested the effectiveness of KASPAR and IROMEC. IROMEC was designed for children with special needs in order to encourage them to be engaged in play activities. KASPAR was developed to facilitate social interaction, including applications designed to help children with autism. We examined whether these two robots can support the achievement of fundamental therapeutic and educational objectives for the cognitive and social development of these children. We performed similar play scenarios with both robots and monitored their effects on the behaviour of the children. In this paper we focus on the cause and effect game called Make it move.

A preliminary analysis of the data shows very encouraging results. The interaction with the robots seemed to have in general positive influence on the development of the children's social skills.

The level of success achieving the different objectives varied from child to child depending on the level and nature of their disability.

References

  1. Besio, S. (2008) (editor). Analysis of Critical Factors Involved in Using in Interactive Robots for Education and Therapy of Children with Disabilities, UNIService, Trento.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bondy, A. Frost, L. (2001a). The picture exchange communcation system. Behaviour Modification, 25, 725--744.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Dautenhahn, K. and Werry, I. (2004). Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: Background, motivation and challenges, Pragmatics & Cognition, 12:1, 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C. L., Walters, M. L., Robins, B., Kose- Bagci, H., Assif Mirza, N., Blow, M. (2009). KASPAR - A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 6 (3), 369--397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dunn, L. And Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (PPVT#8482;-4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28, 3, 300--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Iacono, I., Lehmann, H., Marti, P., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, (2011). Robots as Social Mediators for Children with Autism -- A Preliminary Analysis Comparing Two Different Robotic Platforms, Proceedings of ICDL-EpiRob2011, International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) and the International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics (EpiRob), 24--27 August 2011, Frankfurt am Main.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Marti, P., Giusti, L., Rullo, A. (2009). Robot as Social Mediators: Field Trials with Children with Special Needs. In: (Ed.) Emliani, P. L., Burzagli, A., Como, F., Gabbanini, F., Salminen, A. Assistive Technology for Adapted Equipment to Inclusive Environments, Proceedings of the AAATE 2009, August 31 -- September 2, 2009, pp 165--169, IOS press, Amsterdam. ISBN: 978-1-60750-042-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marti, P. (2010). Bringing playfulness to disability, in Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human Computer Interaction, NordiCHI 2010, (Reykjavik, Iceland, October 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Power, T. G. (2000). Play and Exploration in Children and Animals, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Robins, B. Dickerson, P. Stribling, P. Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Robot-Mediated Joint Attention in Children with Autism: A Case Study in robothuman interaction, Interaction Studies 5:2, 161--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst R. te and Billard, A. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: Can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS), Vol 4(2) special edition, Springer- Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Robins, B., Otero, N., Ferrari, E. and Dautenhahn, K., (2007). Eliciting Requirements for a Robotic Toy for Children with Autism -- Results from User Panels. 16th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication - RO-MAN 2007, Jeju island, Korea.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Robins, B., Ferrari, E. and Dautenhahn, K., (2008). Developing Scenarios for Robot Assisted Play. 17th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication - RO-MAN 2008, Munich, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Dickerson, P. (2009). From Isolation to Communication: A Case Study Evaluation of Robot Assisted Play for Children with Autism with a Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot, Proc. the Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, ACHI 09, Cancun, Mexico. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Robins, B. Ferrari, E. Dautenhahn, K. Kronrief, G. Prazak, B. Gerderblom, G. J. Caprino F. Laudanna E. and Marti, P. (2010 in press). Developing Scenarios for Robot Assisted Play Informed by User Panels and Field Trials. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies IJHCS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sparrow, S. S. Cicchetti, D. V. Balla, D. A. (2006). Vineland II: A Revision of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: II. Teacher Report Form. Circle Pines, Minnesota: Pearson Assessments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Spitzer, S. L. (2008). Play in children with autism: Structure and experience. In L. D. Parham and L. S. Fazio (Eds.), Play in Occupational Therapy for Children (2nd ed.) St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier, 351--374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Steinfeld, A., Jenkins, O. C., Scassellati, B. (2009). The Oz of Wizard: Simulating the Human for Interaction Research. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction ISBN: 978-1-60558-404-1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Wainer, J., Dautenhahn, K., Robins, B., Amirabdollahian, F. (2010). Collaborating with Kaspar: Using an Autonomous Humanoid Robot to Foster Cooperative Dyadic Play among Children with Autism. Proc. IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Sheraton Nashville Downtown, Nashville, TN, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Wetherby, A. and Prizant, B. (2002). Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile- First Normed Edition. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wing, L. and Gould, J. (1979). Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: Epidemiology and Classification. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 9, 11--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. World Health Organization (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. 'Make it move': playing cause and effect games with a robot companion for children with cognitive disabilities

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ECCE '11: Proceedings of the 29th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
            August 2011
            291 pages
            ISBN:9781450310291
            DOI:10.1145/2074712

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 24 August 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader