skip to main content
research-article

Student assessment in the ubiquitously connected world

Published:01 October 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Student cheating on university assessments from entrance exams to finals and from contract cheating on coursework to requesting exam answers using a mobile phone during the exam, has received more and more attention of late. As connection to the Internet becomes ubiquitous and computing and communications technology more embedded in our environment, it is argued that a re-focussing on providing educational opportunities is needed in higher education, rather than chasing the ever-retreating prospect of perfect, or even adequate, assessment for the purposes of qualification.

References

  1. Attwood, R. 2010. We can work it out. Times Higher Education, 2nd September. www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=413277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baty, P. 2005. Bought essays fail to hit the mark. Times Higher Education, 8th April. www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=195169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BBC. 2010a (July). Finland makes broadband a 'legal right'. www.bbc.co.uk/news/10461048.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. BBC. 2010b (March). Internet access is a 'fundamental right'. news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8548190.stm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellucci, A., Malizia, A., Diaz, P., & Aedo, I. 2010. Human-Display Interaction Technology: Emerging Remote Interfaces for Pervasive Display Environments. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 9(2), 72--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age, no. 1. Chichester: Blackwell. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Castellucci, S. J., & MacKenzie, I. S. 2008. UniGest: Text-entry using three degrees of motion. Pages 3549--3554 of: Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -- CHI 2008. New York, NY: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. CBC. 2011 (May). High-tech medical exam cheating alleged. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/05/31/bc-high-tech-mcat-scam.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerf, M., Thiruvengadam, N., Mormann, F., Kraskov, A., Quiroga, R. Q., Koch, C., & Fried, I. 2010. On-line, voluntary control of human temporal lobe neurons. Nature, 467(7319), 1104--1108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. China Daily. 2011. Use of anti-plagiarism software sparks controversy. China Daily, 17th January. www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011-01/17/content_11869018.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Clegg, S., & Flint, A. 2006. More Heat than Light: Plagiarism in Its Appearing. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(3), pp. 373--387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. de Jager, K., & Brown, C. 2010. The tangled web: investigating academics' views of plagiarism at the University of Cape Town. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 513--528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Elwood, J. 2010. Exploring girl's relatinoship to and with achievement: linking assessment, learning, mind and gender. In: Jackson et al. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fearn, H. 2008. The class of 2020? Times Higher Education, 27 November. www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=404431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbs, G, & Simpson, C. 2004-5. Conditions Under Which Assessmet Supports Students' Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3--31. www2.glos.ac.uk/offload/tli/lets/lathe/issue1/issue1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawk, B., Rieder, D. M., & Oviedo, O. O. (eds). 2008. Small Tech: the Culture of Digital Tools. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hogg, C. 2009 (April). China hi-tech exam cheats jailed. news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7980607.stm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson, J., Pachter, C., & Renold, E. (eds). 2010. Girls and Education 3-16: Continuing Concerns, New Agendas. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jenkins, T., & Helmore, S. 2006. Coursework for Cash: The Threat from On-line Plagiarism. Pages 121--126 of: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference for Information and Computer Science, Dublin. Higher Education Academy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, S., Hong, S. H., & Jeon, J. W. 2003. Designing a universal keyboard using chording gloves. Pages 142--147 of: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Universal usability. CUU '03. New York, NY: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. MacKenzie, I. S., & Felzer, T. 2010. SAK: Scanning ambiguous keyboard for efficient one-key text entry. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 17(11), 1--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nolan, J., Mann, S., & Wellman, B. 2008. Sousveillance: Wearable and Digital Tools in Surveilled Environments. In: Hawk et al. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ortiz Jr, S. 2007. Brain-Computer Interfaces: Where Human and Machine Meet. Computer, 40(1), 17--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Pillay, G. 2010. The utilitarian fallacy. Times Higher Education, 12th November. www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=414247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ribak, R. 2009. Remote control, umbilical cord and beyond: The mobile phone as a transitional object. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 183--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Vincent, D. 2000. The Rise of Mass Literacy. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Vinge, V. 2006. Rainbow's End. New York, NY: Tor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yomiuri Shimbun. 2011 (28th Feb). Web exam leak rocks elite school/Poster asked for answers in mathematics, English on Yahoo! Japan site. www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110227003929.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Student assessment in the ubiquitously connected world

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society
          ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society  Volume 41, Issue 1
          October 2011
          48 pages
          ISSN:0095-2737
          DOI:10.1145/2095266
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2011 Author

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 October 2011

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader