skip to main content
article
Free Access

Topology aggregation for hierarchical routing in ATM networks

Published:01 April 1995Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper provides a tutorial for topology arregation in large hierarchical communication networks. Specifically, it examines some issues of topology aggregation for hierarchical PNNI Routing in ATM networks, presents a complex node representation, and provides some guidelines for topology aggregation. There are two main reasons for topology aggregation. First, topology information must be compressed to avoid excessive complexity in topology adevertisement. Second, the internal topology of a network may have to be hidden for security reasons. A desirable topology aggregation method must adequately represent the topology of a given network for efficient routing and netowrk resource allocation, using a compact advertised topology.

References

  1. {1} Doug Dykeman (Editor), "PNNI Draft Specification," ATM Forum, Contribution 94- 0471 (latest version), March 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. {2} Kumar Sivarajan & Whay Lee, "Issues in the Aggregation of Link State Parameters in Hierarchical PNNI Networks," ATM Forum, Contribution 94-0646, July 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. {3} Whay Lee & Ted Tedijanto, "Proposed Baseline Text for Topology Aggregation in PNNI Routing," ATM Forum, 94-1154, November/December 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. {4} Whay Lee, "Some Guidelines for PNNI Topology Aggregation," ATM Forum, 95- 0153, February 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. {5} Joel Halpern & Ross Callon, "Link and Node Metrics," ATM Forum, Contribution 94-0590, July 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. {6} Vasant Sahay, Jonathan Davar, & Farokh Deboo, "Metrics for Representing Internal Topology of a Logical Group Node," ATM Forum, 94-0449, May 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. {7} Ted Tedijanto & Whay Lee, "Proposed Baseline Text for Link State Parameters and Update Protocol," ATM Forum, 94-0645, July 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. {8} Whay Lee, "Classification of Link State Parameters," ATM Forum, 94-0672, July 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. {9} Whay Lee, "Classification of Nodal State Parameters," ATM Forum, 95-0134, February 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. {10} David Peleg & Eli Upfal, "A Trade-Off between Space and Efficiency for Routing Tables," Journal of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 510-530, July 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. {11} Ingo Althofer, Gautam Das, David Dobkin, Deborah Joseph, & Jose Soares, "On Sparse Spanners of Weighted Graphs," Discrete Computational Geometry, Vol. 9, pp. 81-100, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. {12} Whay Lee, "Complexity of Metric Aggregation," ATM Forum, 95-0200, February 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. {13} David Peleg & Alejandro A. Schaffer, "Graph Spanners," Journal of Graph Theory, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 99-116, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. {14} Baruch Awerbuch, "Complexity of Network Synchronization," Journal of the ACM, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 804-823, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. {15} Whay Lee & Joel Halpern, "Cell Loss Ratio -- Link Attribute or Link Metric?" ATM Forum, 95-0133, February 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. {16} Whay Lee, "A Minimal Spanning Connectivity Method for Link State Aggregation," ATM Forum, 94-0673, July 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. {17} Whay Lee, "Spanning Tree Method for Link State Aggregation in Large Communication Networks," IEEE INFOCOM '95, April 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. {18} Whay Lee, "Topology Aggregation in PNNI Routing," ATM Forum, 94-0874, September 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. {19} Whay Lee & Michael Hluchyj, "Multi-Criteria Routing subject to Resource and Performance Constraints," ATM Forum, 94-0280, March 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. {20} Joel Halpern, "Nodal Metrics with Pairwise Values," ATM Forum, 94-0862, September 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. {21} Ethan Spiegel, "Representation of Node Parameters Using Exceptions," ATM Forum, 94-0907, September 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. {22} Joel Halpern, "Allocating Resources in Transit Peer Groups," ATM Forum, 95-0100, February 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. {23} Whay Lee & Ted Tedijanto, "Topology Aggregation and Path Selection in PNNI Routing," ATM Forum, 94-1155, November 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Topology aggregation for hierarchical routing in ATM networks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
            ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 25, Issue 2
            April 1995
            100 pages
            ISSN:0146-4833
            DOI:10.1145/210613
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 1995 Author

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 April 1995

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader