skip to main content
research-article

Highly acyclic groups, hypergraph covers, and the guarded fragment

Published:02 March 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We construct finite groups whose Cayley graphs have large girth even with respect to a discounted distance measure that contracts arbitrarily long sequences of edges from the same color class (subgroup), and only counts transitions between color classes (cosets). These groups are shown to be useful in the construction of finite bisimilar hypergraph covers that avoid any small cyclic configurations. We present two applications to the finite model theory of the guarded fragment: a strengthening of the known finite model property for GF and the characterization of GF as the guarded bisimulation invariant fragment of first-order logic in the sense of finite model theory.

References

  1. Alon, N. 1995. Tools from higher algebra. In Handbook of Combinatorics, R. Graham, M. Grötschel, and Lovász, Eds., Vol. II., North-Holland, 1749--1783. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Andréka, H., van Benthem, J., and Németi, I. 1998. Modal languages and bounded fragments of predicate logic. J. Philosophical Logic 27, 217--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., and Patel-Schneider, P., Eds. 2003. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bárány, V., Gottlob, G., and Otto, M. 2010. Querying the guarded fragment. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS'10). 2--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Beeri, C., Fagin, R., Maier, D., and Yannakakis, M. 1983. On the desirability of acyclic database schemes. J. ACM 30, 497--513. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Berge, C. 1973. Graphs and Hypergraphs. North-Holland. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Courcelle, B. 1990. Graph rewriting: An algebraic and logic approach. In Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, J. van Leeuwen, Ed., Vol. B., Elsevier, 193--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dawar, A. and Otto, M. 2009. Modal characterisation theorems over special classes of frames. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 161, 1--42. (Journal version of LICS'05 paper). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Flum, J., Frick, M., and Grohe, M. 2002. Query evaluation via tree-decomposition. J. ACM 49, 716--752. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fox, R. 1957. Covering spaces with singularities. In A Symposium in Honor of S. Lefschetz, Princeton University Press, 243--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Frick, M. and Grohe, M. 2001. Deciding first-order properties of locally tree-decomposable structures. J. ACM 48, 1184--1206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gottlob, G., Leone, N., and Scarcello, F. 2001. The complexity of acyclic conjunctive queries. J. ACM 43, 431--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Grädel, E. 1999. On the restraining power of guards. J. Symb. Log. 64, 1719--1742.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Grädel, E., Hirsch, C., and Otto, M. 2002. Back and forth between guarded and modal logics. ACM Trans. Computat. Log. 3, 418--463. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Grohe, M. 2008. Logic, graphs, and algorithms. In Logic and Automata, History and Perspectives, J. Flum, E. Grädel, and T. Wilke, Eds., Amsterdam University Press, 357--422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodkinson, I. and Otto, M. 2003. Finite conformal hypergraph covers and Gaifman cliques in finite structures. Bull. Symb. Logic 9, 387--405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Otto, M. 2004. Modal and guarded characterisation theorems over finite transition systems. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 130, 173--205. (Journal version of LICS'02 paper). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Otto, M. 2006. Bisimulation invariance and finite models. In Colloquium Logicum 2002, Lecture Notes in Logic, ASL, 276--298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Otto, M. 2009. Avoiding incidental homomorphisms into guarded covers. Tech. rep. no. 2600, TU Darmstadt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Otto, M. 2010. Highly acyclic groups, hypergraph covers and the guarded fragment. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS'10). 12--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Otto, M. 2011. Model theoretic methods for fragments of FO and special classes of (finite) structures. In Finite and Algorithmic Model Theory. J. Esparza, C. Michaux, and C. Steinhorn, Eds., LMS Lecture Note Series Series, vol. 379, Cambridge University Press, 271--341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosen, E. 1997. Modal logic over finite structures. J. Logic, Lang. Inf. 6, 427--439. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. van Benthem, J. 1983. Modal Logic and Classical Logic. Bibliopolis, Napoli.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Highly acyclic groups, hypergraph covers, and the guarded fragment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Journal of the ACM
        Journal of the ACM  Volume 59, Issue 1
        February 2012
        166 pages
        ISSN:0004-5411
        EISSN:1557-735X
        DOI:10.1145/2108242
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 March 2012
        • Accepted: 1 October 2011
        • Revised: 1 September 2011
        • Received: 1 December 2010
        Published in jacm Volume 59, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader