- Ayre R., Gottesman B., 'Group Enabled', Australian Personal Computer, August, 1994, pp. 187-196Google Scholar
- Berkeley, D., De Hoog, R., Humphreys, P., Software Development Project Mag_ agement: Process and Support, Ellis Horwood / Simon and Schuster, England, 1990 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dean, B.V., Denzler, D.R., Watldns, J.J, 'Multiproject Staff Scheduling with Variable Resource Constraints', IEEE Transactions on En~neering Mana~ment, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 59-72, February, 1992Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edgley, G.J., 'Type and Temperament', Association Management, Vol. 44, Iss. I0, October, 1992, pp. 83-92Google Scholar
- Eglese, R. W., 'Simulated Annealing' A Tool of Operational Research', European Journal of O~erational Research, Vol. 46, 1990, pp. 271-281Google ScholarCross Ref
- Finneran, M., 'Computing Professionals: Who are we?', Business Communications Review. Vol. 24, iss. 1, january, 1994, pp. 82-83Google Scholar
- Fmge', M., Rollins, T., 'Performance Feedback - Multi- Source and SofBvare-Assisted - Increases Personal and Organizational Success at ARCO Transportation', Emp!omem Relations Today, Vol. 20, Iss. 3, Autumn, 1993, pp. 273-286Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heck, M., Xeeping Jobs on Course', Macworld, April, 1992, pp. 146-151Google Scholar
- ingber, L., 'Simulated Annealing: Practice versus Theory', Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 18, No. 11, 1993Google Scholar
- Jeffcoat, D.E., Bulfin, R.L., 'Simulated Annealing for Resource-Constrained Scheduling', European J.ournal of Operational Research, Vol. 70, 1993, pp. 43-51Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., Vecchi, M. P., 'Optimisation by Simulated Annealing', Science, Vol. 220, No. 4598, May 13, 1983, pp. 671-680Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kliem, R.L., 'Project Proficiency', Computerw0rld, July 22, 1991, pp. 77-78Google Scholar
- Kuik R., Salomon M., Van Wassenhove L., Maes J., 'Linear Programming, SA and Tabu Search Heuristics for Lotsizing in Bottleneck Assembly Systems', i~_~ Transactions, Vol. 25, No. 1, January, 1993Google Scholar
- Leitheiser, R.L., qVIIS Skills for the 1990s: A Survey of MIS Managers'Perceptions', Journal of Management Information Systems, Summer, 1992, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 69-91 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, 1L K-Y., Willis, R. J., 'Alternative Resources in Project Scheduling', Computers in Operations Research, Vol. 18, No. 8, 1991, pp. 663-668 Google ScholarDigital Library
- McLeod, P.L., 'Are Human-Factors People Really So Different? Comparisons of interpersonal Behaviour and Implications for Design Teams', Journal of Management Information Systems, Summer, 1992, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 113-132 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meng, G.J., 'Using Job Descriptions, Performance, and Pay Innovations to Support Quality: A Paper Company's Experience', National Productivity Review, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, June, 1992, pp. 247-255Google ScholarCross Ref
- Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A., Teller, E., ~quation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines', The Journal of Chemical P~ Vol. 21, No. 6, June, 1953, pp. t087-1092Google Scholar
- Nagro, R.G., 'Skills Assessment Takes a I-tigh-Tech Turn', HR Magazine, Vol. 39, Iss. 6, June, 1994, pp. 107-111Google Scholar
- Percy, M., 'Simulated Annealing for Optimisafion Problems', TheC Users Journal, July, 1992, pp. 71-84 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Press W. H., Teuklolsky S. A., (1991), 'Simulated Annealing Optimisation Over Continuous Spaces', Computers in Physics, July-August, 1991, pp. 426-429Google Scholar
- Rakos, J., ~Vlaximising Your Most Valuable Resource', Computing Canada, Vol. 18, No. 19, September, 1992, p. 44Google Scholar
- Shaffer, G., 'Coping with Change', Australian Personal Corn up_.u/~, August, 1994, pp. 169-171Google Scholar
- Slaelmercnne, E.K., '?lanning for Project Management', Journal of Systems Management, January, 1989, pp. 16- 20 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sorensen, R., Franklin, G.M., 'Teamwork Developed a Successful Appraisal System' ,~ Focus, Vol. 69, Iss. 8, August, 1992, pp. 34Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A quantitative approach to the formation of workgroups
Recommendations
Lessons learned from developing and applying self-assessment instruments for evaluating project management competences in two large organizations
AbstractThe paper reports on lessons learned from developing and applying self-assessments instruments in two cases from Norway and Germany. The purpose of the self-assessment instruments has been to obtain an overall understanding of the competence level ...
Management: The Key to Success
The author outlines some important management concerns that determine the success of human-factors efforts. She identifies and discusses the issues involved in adding human factors to the design process. They are: scheduling; organizational roles; ...
A practical approach for software project management
CompSysTech '09: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in ComputingThe paper gives an introduction of the art of software project management and fixes its place in the scope of project management discipline. The development of Project Management Software (PMS) is an active research area in the field of Project ...
Comments