skip to main content
10.1145/2145204.2145266acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What do you think?: the structuring of an online community as a collective-sensemaking process

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

I observe conversations that take place as Wikipedia members negotiate, construct, and interpret its policies. Logs of these conversations offer a rare perhaps unparalleled opportunity to track how individuals, as they try to make sense, engage others in social interacts that become a collective processes of sensemaking. I draw upon Weick's model of sensemaking as committed-interpretation, which I ground in a qualitative inquiry into policy discussion pages, in attempt to explain how structuration emerges as interpretations are negotiated, and then committed through conversation, and as they are reified in the policy. I argue that the wiki environment provides conditions that help commitments form, strengthen and diffuse, and that this, in turn, helps explain trends of stabilization observed in previous research. The proposed model may prove useful for understanding structurational processes in other large wiki communities, and potentially in other radically open organizations.

References

  1. Barley, S.R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (1), 78--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Barley, S.R. Technology, Power, and the Social Organization of Work: Towards a Pragmatic Theory of Skilling and Deskilling. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 6, 33--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Beschastnikh, I., Kriplean, T. and McDonald, D.W., Wikipedian self-governance in action: Motivating the policy lens. in International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), (2008), AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, S.E. How Conversation Is Shaped by Visual and Spoken Evidence. in Trueswell, J.C. and Tanenhaus, M.K. eds. Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the Language-as-Product and Language-as-Action traditions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005, 95--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryant, S.L., Forte, A. and Bruckman, A., Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. in GROUP International Conference on Supporting Group Work, (Sanibel Island, FL, USA, 2005), ACM, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Buriol, L., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Leonardi, S. and Millozzi, S., Temporal evolution of the wikigraph. in Web Intelligence Conference (2006), IEEE CS Press, 45--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Butler, B., Joyce, E. and Pike, J., Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia. in Twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (Session: Shared Authoring), (Florence, Italy, 2008), ACM, 1101--1110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. Exploring Complex Organizations: A Cultural Perspective. Sage Publications, Inc, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Forte, A. and Bruckman, A., Scaling consensus: increasing decentralization in Wikipedia governance. in Hawaiian International Conference of Systems Sciences (HICSS), (Hawaii, 2008), IEEE Computer Society, 157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Forte, A. and Bruckman, A., Why do people write for Wikipedia? Incentives to contribute to open. in GROUP 05 workshop: Sustaining community: The role and design of incentive mechanisms in online systems. , (Sanibel Island, FL, USA, 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Forte, A., Larco, V. and Bruckman, A. Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26 (1), 49--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kellogg, K.C. Operating Room: Relational Spaces and Micro-Institutional Change in Surgery. American Journal of Sociology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B.A. and Chi, E.H., He says, she says: Conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. in Twenty fifth SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '07), (2007), ACM, 453--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kriplean, T., Beschastnikh, I., McDonald, D.W. and Golder, S.A., Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs* w or how policy mediates mass participation. in Conference on Supporting Group Work, (2007), ACM, 167--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Malone, T.W. The Future of Work: How the New Order of Business Will Shape Your Organization, Your Management Style, and Your Life. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Malone, T.W., Laubacher, R. and Morton, M.S.S. Inventing the Organizations of the 21st Century. The MIT Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. March, J.G. Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (4), 563--577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. March, J.G., Schulz, M. and Zhou, X. The dynamics of rules: Change in written organizational codes. Stanford Univ Presss, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Morgan, J.T. and Zachry, M., Negotiating with angry mastodons: the wikipedia policy environment as genre ecology. in 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '10), (New York, NY, USA, 2010), ACM, 165--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Orlikowski, W.J. Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective. Information Systems Research, 7 (1), 63--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Reagle, J. Is the Wikipedia Neutral. 2005. Retrieved 5--13, 2010, from http://reagle.org/joseph/2005/06/neutrality.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Suh, B., Chi, E.H., Kittur, A. and Pendleton, B.A., Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with wikidashboard. in Twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '08), (2008), ACM, 1037--1040. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Viegas, F., Wattenberg, M. and McKeon, M., The hidden order of Wikipedia. in OCSC 2007 - Online Communities and Social Computing: second international conference, held as part of HCI International, (Beijing, China, 2007), Springer, 445--454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wales, J. Jimmy Wales on the birth of Wikipedia. Video of talk at the TED conference, Monterey, CA, USA July, 2005. Retrieved May 17, 2010, from http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/jimmy_wales_on_the_birth_of_wikipedia.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Weick, K.E. Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Weick, K.E. Sensemaking in organizations: Small structures with large consequences. in Murnighan, J.K. ed. Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research, Prentice Hall College Division, 1993, 10--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. What do you think?: the structuring of an online community as a collective-sensemaking process

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
      February 2012
      1460 pages
      ISBN:9781450310864
      DOI:10.1145/2145204

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 February 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '12 Paper Acceptance Rate164of415submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader