Social sensitivity and classroom team projects: an empirical investigation

ABSTRACT

Team work is the norm in major development projects and industry is continually striving to improve team effectiveness. Researchers have established that teams with high levels of social sensitivity tend to perform well when completing a variety of specific collaborative tasks. Social sensitivity is the personal ability to perceive, understand, and respect the feelings and viewpoints of others, and it is reliably measurable. However, the tasks in recent research have been primarily short term, requiring only hours to finish, whereas major project teams work together for longer durations and on complex tasks. Our claim is that, social sensitivity can be a key component in predicting the performance of teams that carry out major projects. Our goal is to determine if previous research, which was not focused on students or professionals in scientific or technical fields, is germane for people in computing disciplines. This paper reports the results from an empirical study that investigates whether social sensitivity is correlated with the performance of student teams on large semester-long projects. The overall result supports our claim that the team social sensitivity is highly correlated with successful team performance. It suggests, therefore, that educators in computer-related disciplines, as well as computer professionals in the workforce, should take the concept of social sensitivity seriously as an aid or obstacle to productivity.

References

1. Bacon, D.R., Stewart, K.A., and Silver, W.S. 1999. Lessons from the Best and Worst Student Team Experiences: How a Teacher Can Make the Difference. Journal of Management Education. 23, 467--488.
2. Baron-Cohen, S., Bolton, P., Wheelwright, S., Scahill, V., Short, L., Mead, G., and Smith, A. 1998. Autism occurs more often in families of physicists, engineers, and mathematicians. Autism. 2, 296--301.
3. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., and Plumb, I. 2001. The 'Reading the Mind in the Eyes' Test Revised Version: A Study with Normal Adults, and Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High-functioning Autism. Child Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 2, 241--251,.
4. Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Neubert, M.J., and Mount, M.K. 1998. Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes and Team Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Pshchology. 83, 377--391.
5. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., and Rombach, H.D. 1994. The Goal Question Metric Approach. Technical Report. Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland.
6. Begel, A. and Simon, B. 2008. Struggles of new college graduates in their first software development job. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (Portland, OR, USA, 2008). ACM.
7. Belbin, M. 1993. Team Roles at Work. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
8. Beranek, G., Zuser, W., and Grechenig, T. 2005. Functional Group Roles in Software Engineering Teams. In HSSE'05 (St. Louis Missouri USA, May 2005), 1--5.
9. Bradley, J.H. and Hebert, F.J. 1997. The effect of personality type on team performance. Journal of Management Development. 16, 5, 337--353.
10. Chan, C.L., Jiang, J.J., and Klein, G. 2008. Team Task Skills as a Facilitator for Application and Development Skills. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management. 55, 3 (Aug. 2008), 434--441.
11. Cohen, S.G. and Bailey, D.E. 1997. What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite. Journal of Management. 23, 3, 239--290.
12. Dubinsky, Y. and Hazzan, O. 2006. Using Roles Scheme to Derive Software Project Metrics. Journal of Systems Architecture. 52, 11 (Nov. 2006), 693--699.
13. Dukerich, J.M. 2002. Leadership, team building, and team member characteristics in high performance project teams. Engineering Management Journal. Dec. 2002.
14. Faraj, S. and Sproull, L. 2000. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science. 46, 12 (De. 2000), 1554--1568.
15. Felder, R. and Brent, R.. 2001. Effective strategies for cooperative learning. Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching. 10, 69--75.
16. Gorla, N. and Wah Lam, Y. 2004. Who Should Work With Whom? 2004. Communications of the ACM. 47, 6 (Jun. 2004), 79--82.
17. Greenspan, S. 1981. Defining childhood social competence. Advances in Special Education. 3, 1--39.
18. Hallerback, M.U., Lugnegard, T., Hjarthag, F., and Gillberg. C. 2009. Cognitive neuropsychiatry, 14 (Mar. 2009), 127--143.
19. Ikonen, M. and Kurhila, J. 2009. Discovering High-Impact Success Factors in Capstone Software Projects. In SIGITE'09 (Fairfax, Virginia, USA, October 2009), 235--244.
20. Langan-Fox, J., Cooper, C.L., and Klimoski, R.J. Research Companion to theDysfunctional Workplace: Management Challenges and Symptoms (New Horizons in Management). Edward Elgar Publishing. Camberly, UK.
21. Lewis, T.S. and Smith, W.J. 2008. Creating High Performing Software Engineering Teams: The Impact of Problem Solving Style Dominance On Group Conflict and Performance. 24, 2, 121--130.
22. Mathieu, J.E., Heffner, T.S., Goodwin, G.F., Salas, E., and Cannon-Bowers, J.A. 2000. The Influence of Shared Mental Models on Team Process and Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 2 (Apr. 2000), 273--283.
23. Mersino, A. 2007. Emotional Intelligence for Project Managers. American Management Association, New York.
24. Pedrini, D.T. and Pedrini, B.C. Vineland Social Maturity Scale Profile. Retrieved August 18, 2011 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED079342.pdf.
25. Pieterse, V., Kourie, D., and Sonnekus, I. 2006. Software Engineering Team Diversity and Performance. In Proceedings of annual SAICSIT 204 (Somerset West South Africa 2006), 180--186.
26. Salovey, P. and Mayer, J.D. 1990. Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality. 9, 3, 185--211.
27. Shen, S., Prior, S.D., White, A.S., and Karamanoglu, M. 2007. Using Personality Type Differences to Form Engineering Design Teams. Engineering Education. 2, 2, 54--66.
28. Smarkusky, D., Dempsey, r., Ludka, J., and de Quillettes, F. 2005. In SIGCSE '05 (St. Louis, Missouri USA, Feb. 2005).
29. Sternberg, R.J. Handbook of intelligence, 2nd ed. 2000. (359--379). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
30. Strang, R. 1930. Measures of Social Intelligence, American Journal of Sociology, 36, 2, 263--269.
31. Thorndike, R.L. and Stein, S. 1937. An Evaluation of the Attempts to Measure Social Intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 34, 5 (May 1937), 275--284.
32. West, M.A. 2004. Effective teamwork: practical lessons from organizational research. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 9--14.
33. Woolley, A.W., Chabris, C.F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., and Malone,T.W. 2010. Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science 2010. ePub ahead of print doi10.1126/science.1193147

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education

        • Information systems education