skip to main content
10.1145/2157689.2157717acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

'If you sound like me, you must be more human': on the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism

Published:05 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In an experiment we manipulated a robot's voice in two ways: First, we varied robot gender; second, we equipped the robot with a human-like or a robot-like synthesized voice. Moreover, we took into account user gender and tested effects of these factors on human-robot acceptance, psychological closeness and psychological anthropomorphism. When participants formed an impression of a same-gender robot, the robot was perceived more positively. Participants also felt more psychological closeness to the same-gender robot. Similarly, the same-gender robot was anthropomorphized more strongly, but only when it utilized a human-like voice. Results indicate that a projection mechanism could underlie these effects.

References

  1. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Nass, C., Moon, Y. and Green, N. 1997. Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 864--876.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Eyssel, F. and Hegel, F. (in press). (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of social robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Crowell, C. R., Scheutz, M., Schermerhorn, P. and Villano, M. 2009. Gendered voice and robot entities: Perceptions and reactions of male and female subjects. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2009), 3735--3741. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Eyssel, F. and Kuchenbrandt, D. (in press). Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kuchenbrandt, D., Eyssel, F., Bobinger, S. and Neufeld. M. 2011. Minimal group - maximal effect? Evaluation and anthropomorphization of the humanoid robot NAO. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Robotics, 104--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hegel, F., Eyssel, F. and Wrede, B. 2010. The social robot Flobi: Key concepts of industrial design. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), 120--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D. and Bobinger, S. 2011. Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 61--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gray, H. M., Gray, K. and Wegner, D. M. 2007. Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. 'If you sound like me, you must be more human': on the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '12: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2012
      518 pages
      ISBN:9781450310635
      DOI:10.1145/2157689

      Copyright © 2012 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 March 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader