skip to main content
article
Free Access

Using formal specifications in the design of a human-computer interface

Published:01 April 1983Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Formal specification techniques are valuable in software development because they permit a designer to describe the external behavior of a system precisely without specifying its internal implementation. Although formal specifications have been applied to many areas of software systems, they have not been widely used for specifying user interfaces. In the Military Message System project at the Naval Research Laboratory, the user interfaces as well as the other components of a family of message systems are specified formally, and prototypes are then implemented from the specifications. This paper illustrates the specification of the user interface module for the family of message systems. It then surveys specification techniques that can be applied to human-computer interfaces and divides the techniques into two categories: those based on state transition diagrams and those based on BNF. Examples of both types of specifications are given. Specification notations based on state transition diagrams are preferable to those based on BNF because the former capture the surface structure of the user interface more perspicuously. In either notation, a high-level abstraction for describing the semantics of the user interface is needed, and an application-specific one is used here.

References

  1. 1 Conway, M.E. Design of a separable transition-diagram compiler. Comm. ACM S, 7 (July 1963), 396-408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2 Dijkstra, E.W. A Discipline of Programming. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1976, pp. 209-217. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 Embley, D.W. Empirical and formal language design applied to a unified control construct for interactive computing. Int. I. Man- Machine Studies 10, 2 (March 1978), 197-218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Foley, J.D. and Wallace, V.L. The art of graphic man-machine conversation. Proceedings of the IEEE 62, 4 (April 1974), 462-471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5 Hanau, P.R. and Lenorovitz, D.R. Prototyping and simulation tools for user/computer dialogue design. Computer Graphics 14, 3 (July 1980), 271-278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6 Heitmeyer, C.L. and Wilson, S.H. Military message systems: Current status and future directions. IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-2S, 9 (Sept. 1980), 1645-1854.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 Heitmeyer, C.L. An intermediate command language (ICL) for the family of military message systems. Technical Memorandum 7590- 450:CH:ch, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., 13 Nov. 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Heitmeyer, C.L., Landwehr, C.E., and Cornwell, M.R. The use of quick prototypes in the military message system project ACM SIGSOFT. Software Engineering Notes 7, 5 (Dec. 1982). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9 Hueras, J.F. A forrhalization of syntax diagrams as k-deterministic language recognizers. M.S. thesis, Computer Science Dept., Univ. California, Irvine, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 Jacob, R.J.K. Survey and examples of specification techniques for user interfaces. NRL Report, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., (To appear).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 Johnson, S.C. Language development tools on the Unix system. IEEE Computer 13, 8 (Aug. 1980), 16-21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12 MUMPS Development Committee. MUMPS language standard. American National Standards Institute, New York, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Moran, T.P. The command language grammar: A representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems. Int. 1. Man-Machine Studies 15, 1 (July 1981), 3-50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14 Parnas, D.L. On the use of transition diagrams in the design of a user interface for an interactive computer system. Proc. 24th Nat'l ACM Conference (1989), 379-385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15 Reisner, P. Formal grammar and human factors design of an interactive graphics system. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. SE-7, 2 (March 1981), 229-240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16 Shneiderman, B. Multi-party grammars and related features for defining interactive systems. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-12, 2 (March 1981), 148-154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 Singer, A. Formal methods and human factors in the design of interactive languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Computer and Information Science Dept., Univ. Massachusetts, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18 Wilson, S.H,, Kallander, J.W., Thomas, N.M, III, Klitzkie, L.C., and Bunch, J.R, Jr. MME quick look report. Memorandum Report 3992, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 Woods, W.A. Transition network grammars for natural language analysis. Comm. ACM 13, 10 (Oct. 1970), 591-606. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Using formal specifications in the design of a human-computer interface

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Communications of the ACM
          Communications of the ACM  Volume 26, Issue 4
          April 1983
          68 pages
          ISSN:0001-0782
          EISSN:1557-7317
          DOI:10.1145/2163
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1983 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 April 1983

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader