skip to main content
10.1145/2168556.2168616acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparison of eye movement filters used in HCI

Published:28 March 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We compared various real-time filters designed to denoise eye movements from low-sampling devices. Most of the filters found in literature were implemented and tested on data gathered in a previous study. An improvement was proposed for one of the filters. Parameters of each filter were adjusted to ensure their best performance. Four estimation parameters were proposed as criteria for comparison. The output from the filters was compared against two idealized signals (the signals denoised offline). The study revealed that FIR filters with triangular or Gaussian kernel (weighting) functions and parameters dependent on signal state show the best performance.

References

  1. Duchowski, A, T. 2003 Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gu, J., Meng, M., Cook, A., and Faulkner, M. G. 2000. Analysis of eye tracking movements using FIR median hybrid filters. In Proceedings of the 2000 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications (ETRA '00), ACM, 65--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jacob, R. J. K. 1993. Eye movement-based human-computer interaction techniques: Toward non-command interfaces. In Hartson, H. R. and Hix, D. (Eds.) Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 4, 151--190,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jimenez, J., Gutierrez, D., and Latorre, P. 2008. Gaze-based Interaction for Virtual Environments. Granitzer, M. et al. (Eds.), Journal of Universal Computer Science 14, 19, 3085--3098.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. van der Kamp, J., & Sundstedt, V. 2011. Gaze and Voice Controlled Drawing. In Proceeding of The 1st conference on Novel Gaze-Controlled Applications (NGCA'11), ACM, #9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kohler, M. 1997. Using the Kalman Filter to track Human Interactive Motion-Modelling and Initialization of the Kalman Filter for Translational Motion. Tech. Rep. #629, Informatik VII, University of Dortmund.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Komogortsev, O. V., & Khan, J. I. 2007. Kalman filtering in the design of eye-gaze-guided computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human-computer interaction: intelligent multimodal interaction environments (HCI'07), Springer-Verlag, 679--689. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kumar, M., Klingner, J., Puranik, R., Winograd, T., and Paepcke. A. 2008. Improving the accuracy of gaze input for interaction. In Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications (ETRA '08), ACM, 65--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. 2010. An adaptive algorithm for fixation, saccade, and glissade detection in eyetracking data. Behavior Research Methods 42, 1, 188--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Olsson, P. 2007. Real-time and offline filters for eye tracking. Master's thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. 1964. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical chemistry 36, 8, 1627--1639Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sesin, A., Adjouadi, M., Cabrerizo, M., Ayala, M., and Barreto, A. 2008. Adaptive eye-gaze tracking using neural-network-based user profiles to assist people with motor disability. In Yuhasz, S. C. (Ed.), Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 45, 6, 801--818.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Stampe, D. M. 1993. Heuristic filtering and reliable calibration methods for video-based pupil-tracking systems. Behaviour Research Methods 25, 2, 137--142Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Tole, J. R., and Young, L. R. 1981. Digital Filters for Saccade and Fixation Detection. In Fisher, D. F., Monty, R. A. and Senders, J. W. (Eds.) Eye Movements: Cognition and Visual Perception, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 7--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Veneri, G., Federighi, P., Rosini, F., Federico, A., and Rufa, A. 2010. Influences of data filtering on human-computer interaction by gaze-contingent display and eye-tracking applications. Computers in Human Behaviour 26, 6, 1555--1563. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Zhang, X., Ren, X., and Zha. H. 2010. Modeling dwell-based eye pointing target acquisition. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '10), ACM, 2083--2092. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of eye movement filters used in HCI

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ETRA '12: Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
        March 2012
        420 pages
        ISBN:9781450312219
        DOI:10.1145/2168556

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 March 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate69of137submissions,50%

        Upcoming Conference

        ETRA '24
        The 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
        June 4 - 7, 2024
        Glasgow , United Kingdom

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader