skip to main content
research-article

A probabilistic model for component-based shape synthesis

Published: 01 July 2012 Publication History

Abstract

We present an approach to synthesizing shapes from complex domains, by identifying new plausible combinations of components from existing shapes. Our primary contribution is a new generative model of component-based shape structure. The model represents probabilistic relationships between properties of shape components, and relates them to learned underlying causes of structural variability within the domain. These causes are treated as latent variables, leading to a compact representation that can be effectively learned without supervision from a set of compatibly segmented shapes. We evaluate the model on a number of shape datasets with complex structural variability and demonstrate its application to amplification of shape databases and to interactive shape synthesis.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (tp152_12.jpg)
ZIP File (a55-kalogerakis.zip)
Supplemental material.
MP4 File (tp152_12.mp4)

References

[1]
Aliaga, D. G., Rosen, P. A., and Bekins, D. R. 2007. Style grammars for interactive visualization of architecture. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 4.
[2]
Allen, B., Curless, B., and Popović, Z. 2003. The space of human body shapes: reconstruction and parameterization from range scans. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 3.
[3]
Anguelov, D., Srinivasan, P., Koller, D., Thrun, S., Rodgers, J., and Davis, J. 2005. SCAPE: shape completion and animation of people. ACM Transactions on Graphics 24, 3.
[4]
Blanz, V., and Vetter, T. 1999. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, ACM.
[5]
Bokeloh, M., Wand, M., and Seidel, H.-P. 2010. A connection between partial symmetry and inverse procedural modeling. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 4.
[6]
Bouchard, G., and Triggs, B. 2005. Hierarchical part-based visual object categorization. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[7]
Chaudhuri, S., and Koltun, V. 2010. Data-driven suggestions for creativity support in 3D modeling. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 6.
[8]
Chaudhuri, S., Kalogerakis, E., Guibas, L., and Koltun, V. 2011. Probabilistic reasoning for assembly-based 3D modeling. ACM Transactions on Graphics 30, 4.
[9]
Cheeseman, P., and Stutz, J. 1996. Bayesian classification (autoclass): Theory and results. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
[10]
Chen, D.-Y., Tian, X.-P., Shen, Y.-T., and Ouhyoung, M. 2003. On visual similarity based 3D model retrieval. Computer Graphics Forum 22, 3.
[11]
Chennubhotla, C., and Jepson, A. 2001. S-PCA: Extracting multi-scale structure from data. In Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision.
[12]
Fidler, S., and Leonardis, A. 2007. Towards scalable representations of object categories: Learning a hierarchy of parts. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[13]
Fu, H., Cohen-Or, D., Dror, G., and Sheffer, A. 2008. Upright orientation of man-made objects. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 3.
[14]
Funkhouser, T., Kazhdan, M., Shilane, P., Min, P., Kiefer, W., Tal, A., Rusinkiewicz, S., and Dobkin, D. 2004. Modeling by example. ACM Transactions on Graphics 23, 3.
[15]
Huang, Q., Koltun, V., and Guibas, L. 2011. Joint shape segmentation with linear programming. ACM Transactions on Graphics 30, 6.
[16]
Jain, A., Thormahlen, T., Ritschel, T., and Seidel, H.-P. 2012. Exploring shape variations by 3D-model decomposition and part-based recombination. Computer Graphics Forum 31, 2.
[17]
Jin, Y., and Geman, S. 2006. Context and hierarchy in a probabilistic image model. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[18]
Kalogerakis, E., Hertzmann, A., and Singh, K. 2010. Learning 3D mesh segmentation and labeling. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 4.
[19]
Koller, D., and Friedman, N. 2009. Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. The MIT Press.
[20]
Kraevoy, V., Julius, D., and Sheffer, A. 2007. Model composition from interchangeable components. In Proc. Pacific Graphics, IEEE Computer Society.
[21]
Lee, J., and Funkhouser, T. 2008. Sketch-based search and composition of 3D models. In Proc. Eurographics Workshop on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling.
[22]
Merrell, P., and Manocha, D. 2011. Model synthesis: A general procedural modeling algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 6.
[23]
Merrell, P. 2007. Example-based model synthesis. In Proc. Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, ACM.
[24]
Ommer, B., and Buhmann, J. 2010. Learning the compositional nature of visual object categories for recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32, 3.
[25]
Ovsjanikov, M., Li, W., Guibas, L., and Mitra, N. J. 2011. Exploration of continuous variability in collections of 3D shapes. ACM Transactions on Graphics 30, 4.
[26]
Ranzato, M. A., Susskind, J., Mnih, V., and Hinton, G. 2011. On deep generative models with applications to recognition. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[27]
Roux, N. L., Heess, N., Shotton, J., and Winn, J. 2011. Learning a generative model of images by factoring appearance and shape. Neural Computation, 23.
[28]
Sharf, A., Blumenkrants, M., Shamir, a., and Cohen-Or, D. 2006. SnapPaste: an interactive technique for easy mesh composition. Visual Computer 22, 9.
[29]
Sidi, O., van Kaick, O., Kleiman, Y., Zhang, H., and Cohen-Or, D. 2011. Unsupervised co-segmentation of a set of shapes via descriptor-space spectral clustering. ACM Transactions on Graphics 30, 6.
[30]
Stava, O., Beneš, B., Měch, R., Aliaga, D., and Kristof, P. 2010. Inverse procedural modeling by automatic generation of L-systems. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 2.
[31]
Todorovic, S., and Ahuja, N. 2008. Unsupervised category modeling, recognition, and segmentation in images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30, 12.
[32]
Tu, Z., Chen, X., Yuille, A. L., and Zhu, S.-C. 2005. Image parsing: Unifying segmentation, detection, and recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision 63, 2.
[33]
Wessel, R., Blümel, I., and Klein, R. 2009. A 3d shape benchmark for retrieval and automatic classification of architectural data. In Eurographics 2009 Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval.
[34]
Xu, K., Zheng, H., Zhang, H., Cohen-Or, D., Liu, L., and Xiong, Y. 2011. Photo-inspired model-driven 3D object modeling. ACM Transactions on Graphics 30, 4.
[35]
Zhu, L. L., Lin, C., Huang, H., Chen, Y., and Yuille, A. L. 2008. unsupervised structure learning: Hierarchical recursive composition, suspicious coincidence and competitive exclusion. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Multi-part kinematic constraint prediction for automatic generation of CAD model assemblies using graph convolutional networksComputer-Aided Design10.1016/j.cad.2024.103805178(103805)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)Towards the Design of Future Aircraft: A Critical Review On the Tools and MethodologiesAerospace Research Communications10.3389/arc.2024.130962Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • (2024)PHFormerProceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27905(1408-1416)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 31, Issue 4
July 2012
935 pages
ISSN:0730-0301
EISSN:1557-7368
DOI:10.1145/2185520
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2012
Published in TOG Volume 31, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. data-driven 3D modeling
  2. machine learning
  3. probabilistic graphical models
  4. shape structure
  5. shape synthesis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)124
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Multi-part kinematic constraint prediction for automatic generation of CAD model assemblies using graph convolutional networksComputer-Aided Design10.1016/j.cad.2024.103805178(103805)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)Towards the Design of Future Aircraft: A Critical Review On the Tools and MethodologiesAerospace Research Communications10.3389/arc.2024.130962Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • (2024)PHFormerProceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27905(1408-1416)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2024
  • (2024)PhysFiT: Physical-aware 3D Shape Understanding for Finishing Incomplete AssemblyACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/370222644:1(1-16)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2024
  • (2024)GEM3D: GEnerative Medial Abstractions for 3D Shape SynthesisACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers10.1145/3641519.3657415(1-11)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2024
  • (2024)VRTree: Example‐Based 3D Interactive Tree Modeling in Virtual RealityComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1525443:7Online publication date: 7-Nov-2024
  • (2024)DataGarden: Formalizing Personal Sketches into Structured Visualization TemplatesIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345633631:1(1268-1278)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
  • (2024)ANISE: Assembly-Based Neural Implicit Surface ReconstructionIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.326530630:8(4514-4526)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2024)Magic Furniture: Design Paradigm of Multi-Function AssemblyIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.325048830:7(4068-4079)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)CSDN: Cross-Modal Shape-Transfer Dual-Refinement Network for Point Cloud CompletionIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.323606130:7(3545-3563)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media