skip to main content
10.1145/2187980.2188127acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Dynamic selection of activation targets to boost the influence spread in social networks

Published:16 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to combine the viral marketing with the idea of direct selling to for influence maximization in a social network. In direct selling, producers can sell the products directly to the consumers without having to go through a cascade of wholesalers. Through direct selling, it is possible to sell the products in a more efficient and economic manner. Motivated by this idea, we propose a target-selecting independent cascade (TIC) model, in which during influence propagation each active node can give up to attempt to influence some neighboring nodes, named victims, who could be hard to affect, and try to activate some of its friends of friends, termed destinations, who could have higher potential to increase the influence spread. Thus, the next question to ask is that given a social network and a set of seeds for influence propagation under TIC model, how to select targets (i.e., victims and destinations) for the attempts of activation during the propagation to boost of influence spread. We propose and evaluate three heuristics for the target selection. Experiments show that selecting targets based on influence probability between nodes have the highest boost of influence spread.

References

  1. W. Chen, Y. Wang, and S. Yang. Efficient Influence Maximization in Social Networks. In KDD 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Cosley, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, X. Lan, and S. Suri. Sequential Influence Models in Social Networks. In ICWSM 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network. In KDD 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Lappas, E. Terzi, D. Gunopulos, and H. Mannila. Finding Effectors in Social Networks. In KDD 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C.-T. Li, S.-D. Lin, and M.-K. Shan. Finding Influential Mediators in Social Networks. In WWW 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Leskovec, A. Krause, C. Guestrin, C. Faloutsos, J. VanBriesen, and N. Glance. Cost-effective Outbreak Detection in Networks. In KDD 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Mathioudakis, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, A. Gionis, and A. Ukkonen. Sparsification of Influence Networks. In KDD 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Yang and J. Leskovec. Modeling Information Diffusion in Implicit Networks. In ICDM 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic selection of activation targets to boost the influence spread in social networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '12 Companion: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web
      April 2012
      1250 pages
      ISBN:9781450312301
      DOI:10.1145/2187980

      Copyright © 2012 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 April 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader