skip to main content
10.1145/2214091.2214126acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A mixed bag: how work and retirement influence older adults' ICT use

Published:31 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many societies are aging, while Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) use is increasingly being required by governments and workplaces. However, little is known about ICT use by older adults. This research-in-progress paper outlines a case study methodology which seeks to examine the domestication of ICTs by older adults in their everyday lives. Preliminary results suggest that work is an important context that influences ICT introduction, use, and meanings.

References

  1. Birkland, J. L. H., & Kaarst-Brown, M. L. (2010). 'What's so special about studying old people?': The ethical, methodological, and sampling issues surrounding the study of older adults and ICTs. In F. Sudweeks, H. Hrachovec & C. Ess (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Cultural Attitudes Towards Technology and Communication (pp. 341--356). Vancouver, B.C., Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouwhuis, D. G. (2006). Not care but leisure. Gerontechnology, 5(2), 63--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Burtless, G., & Quinn, J. F. (2001). Retirement trends and policies to encourage work among older Americans. In P. P. Budetti, R. V. Burkhauser, J. M. Gregory & H. A. Hunt (Eds.), Ensuring health and income security for an aging workforce (pp. 375--415). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Buse, C. E. (2009). When you retire, does everything become leisure? Information and communication technology use and the work/ leisure boundary in retirement. New Media & Society, 11, 1143--1161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Carlson, E. (2008). The Lucky Few: Between the Greatest Generation and the Baby Boom New York: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson, E. (2009). 20th-Century: U.S. Generations. Population Reference Bureau, 64(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Flyvberg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 148--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Haddon, L. (2000). Social exclusion and information and communication technologies. New Media & Society, 2(4), 387--406.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lie, M., & Sørensen, K. H. (1996). Making technology our own?: Domesticating technology in everyday life. In M. Lie & K. H. Sørensen (Eds.), Making technology our own?: Domesticating technology in everyday life (pp. 1--30). Boston: Scandinavian University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Paul, G., & Stegbauer, C. (2005). Is the digital divide between young and elderly people increasing? {Electronic Version}. First Monday, 10. Retrieved June 16, 2007 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/paul/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Selwyn, N., & Gorard, S. (2008). What computers can't do for you. Adults Learning, 19(6), 26--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and communciation technologies: technical change and everyday life. In R. Mansell & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by design: the politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 44--74). New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Silverstone, R., & Hirsch, E. (1992). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1994). Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces (pp. 15--31). New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). Table 3. Percent Distribution of the Projected Population by Selected Age Groups and Sex for the United States: 2010 to 2050 (NP2008-T3). Retrieved. from http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/summarytables.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. van Bronswijk, J. E. M. H., Bouma, H., Fozard, J. L., Kearnes, W., Davison, G. C., & Tuan, P.-C. (2009). Defining gerontechnology for R&D purposes. Gerontechnology, 8(1), 3--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Young, M. B. (2002). Holding on: How the mass exodus of retiring Baby Boomers could deplete the workforce how employers can stem the tide. Retrieved September 2, 2008. from http://www.hr.state.tx.us/linkage.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A mixed bag: how work and retirement influence older adults' ICT use

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMIS-CPR '12: Proceedings of the 50th annual conference on Computers and People Research
      May 2012
      224 pages
      ISBN:9781450311106
      DOI:10.1145/2214091

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader