ABSTRACT
Pattern recognition is becoming a key application in body-area networks. This paper presents a framework promoting unsupervised training for multi-modal, multi-sensor classification systems. Specifically, it enables sensors provided with pattern-recognition capabilities to autonomously supervise the learning process of other sensors. The approach is discussed using a case study combining a smart camera and a body-worn accelerometer. The body-worn accelerometer sensor is trained to recognize four user activities pairing accelerometer data with labels coming from the camera. Experimental results illustrate the applicability of the approach in different conditions.
- Crossbow technology. http://www.xbow.com.Google Scholar
- T. Abdelzaher, Y. Anokwa, P. Boda, J. Burke, D. Estrin, L. Guibas, A. Kansal, and S. Madden. Mobiscopes for human spaces. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6(2):20--29, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Bannach, P. Lukowicz, and O. Amft. Rapid prototyping of activity recognition applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(2):22--31, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Cucchiara, C. Grana, M. Piccardi, and A. Prati. Detecting moving objects, ghosts and shadows in video streams. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(10):1337--1342, Oct. 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Cucchiara, C. Grana, A. Prati, and R. Vezzani. Probabilistic posture classification for human behaviour analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 35(1):42--54, Jan. 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Cucchiara, C. Grana, G. Tardini, and R. Vezzani. Probabilistic people tracking for occlusion handling. In Proceedings of IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2004), volume 1, pages 132--135, Aug. 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Cucchiara, A. Prati, and R. Vezzani. A multi-camera vision system for fall detection and alarm generation. Expert Systems Journal, 24(5):334--345, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Cutler and L. Davis. Robust real-time periodic motion detection, analysis, and applications. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 22(8):781--796, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. W. DeVaul and S. Pentland. The mithril real-time context engine and activity classification. Technical Report, MIT Media Lab, 2003.Google Scholar
- P. Eugster, P. Felber, R. Guerraoui, and A. Kermarrec. The many faces of publish/subscribe. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(2):114--131, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. M. Gavrila. The visual analysis of human movement: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 73(1):82--98, Jan 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Gelernter and N. Carriero. Coordination languages and their significance. Communication of the ACM, 35(2):96--107, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Hilton, P. Fua, and R. Ronfard. Foreword: Special issue on modeling people: Vision-based understanding of a personŠs shape, appearance, movement, and behaviour. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 104(2--3):87--89, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Kim, S. Im, E. Hong, S. Ahn, and H. Kim. Adl classification using triaxial accelerometers and rfid. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing Convergence Technology. Beijing, China, 2007.Google Scholar
- S. I. L. Bao. Activity recongnition form user-annotated accleration data. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Linz/Vienna, Austria, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Oliver and E. Horvitz. A comparison of hmms and dynamic bayesian networks for recognizing office activities. In International Conference on User Modeling. Edinburgh, UK, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Paskin, C. Guestrin, and J. McFadden. A robust architecture for inference in sensor networks. In International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM Press, Los Angeles (CA), USA, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Patterson, L. Liao, D. Fox, and H. Kautz. Inferring high-level behavior from low-level sensors. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM Press, Seattle (WA), USA, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Patterson, L. Liao, K. Gajos, M. Collier, N. Livic, K. Olson, S. Wang, D. Fox, and H. Kautz. Opportunity knocks: a system to provide cognitive assistance with transportation services. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM Press, Nottingham, UK, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Philipose, K. Fishkin, M. Perkowitz, D. Patterson, D. Fox, H. Kautz, and D. Hahnel. Inferring activities from interactions with objects. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(4):50--57, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Predd, S. Kulkarni, and H. Poor. Distributed learning in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 23(4):56--69, July 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Robertson and I. Reid. A general method for human activity recognition in video. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 104(2--3):232--248, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Urtasun and P. Fua. 3d human body tracking using deterministic temporal motion models. In ECCV (3), pages 92--106, 2004.Google Scholar
- J. Ward, P. Lukowicz, G. Troster, and T. Starner. Activity recognition of assembly tasks using body-worn microphones and accelerometers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(10):1553--1567, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C.-Y. Yam, M. Nixon, and J. Carter. On the relationship of human walking and running: Automatic person identification by gait. In ICPR (1), pages 287--290, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Unsupervised learning in body-area networks
Recommendations
Learning from less for better: semi-supervised activity recognition via shared structure discovery
UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous ComputingDespite the active research into, and the development of, human activity recognition over the decades, existing techniques still have several limitations, in particular, poor performance due to insufficient ground-truth data and little support of intra-...
Annotating smart environment sensor data for activity learning
Smart Environments: Technology to Support HealthcareThe pervasive sensing technologies found in smart homes offer unprecedented opportunities for providing health monitoring and assistance to individuals experiencing difficulties living independently at home. In order to monitor the functional health of ...
Comments