skip to main content
10.1145/224401.224739acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Set management: minimizing synchronization delays of prefabricated parts before assembly

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 1995Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper addresses the problem of synchronizing prefabricated parts for assembly into modules. We examine production environments arising out of semiconductor manufacturing and multi layer ceramics where several prefabricated parts, so-called sets, are necessary to complete a module. Frequently, some of these components are manufactured by the same production system. In order to minimize the inventory of the entire production system and simultaneously to achieve short cycle times, we propose sophisticated sequencing rules (named set management policies) to control the production of components. Based on global status information on the inventory at each service station these policies determine the component which is to be processed next. We evaluate the performance of the set management policies proposed, by means of simulation results for several production environments which feature rework and re-entrant flow. In terms of several performance measures we show that our sequencing rules achieve better results than standard rules such as FCFS of EDD. The mean of the performance measures and also their variances are considered.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. and R. R. Tummala. 1992. Overview of packaging for the IBM Enterprise System/9000 based on the glass-ceramic copper/thin film thermal conduction module. IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids and Manufacturing Technology 15, 426-431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. De, P., J. B. Gosh, and C. E. Wells. 1989. A note on the minimization of mean squared deviation of completion times about a common due date. Management Science 35(6), 1143-1147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. De, P., J. B. Gosh, and C. E. Wells. 1992. On the minimization of completion time variance with a bicriteria extension. Operations Research 40(6), 1148-1155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gise, P. and R. Blanchard. 1986. Modern semiconductor fabrication technology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hall, N. G., W. Kubiak, and S. P. Sethi. 1991. Earliness tardiness scheduling problems iI: Deviation of completion times about a restrictive common due dates. Operations Research 39(5), 847-856. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Heyman, D. P. and M. J. Sobel. 1982. Stochastic Models in Operations Research, Volume I: Stochastic Processes and Operating Characteristics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hogg, G. L., J. Fowler, and M. Ibrahim. 1991. Flow control in semiconductor manufacturing: A survey and projection of needs. Technical report 91110757A-GEN, SEMATECH, Austin, TX.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Johri, P. K. 1992. Practical issues in scheduling and dispatching in semiconductor wafer fabrication. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 12(6), 474- 485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lee, C.-Y. 1992. Efficient algorithms for scheduling semiconductor burn-in operations. Operations Research 40(4), 764-775. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Purm, M. 1994. Reduzierung von Gruppenbearbeitungszeiten in Produktionssytemen. Master's thesis, Institute of Computer Science, University of Wfirzburg, Wiirzburg, Germany. In German.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Resende, M. G. C. 1984. Computer simulation of semiconductor wafer fabrication. Technical Report ORC 86-14, Operations Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Uzsoy, R., L. A. Martin-Vega, C.-Y. Lee, and P. A. Leonard. 1991. Production scheduling algorithms for a semiconductor test facility. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 4(4), 270-280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Womack, J. P., D. T. Jones, and D. Roos. 1990. The machine that changed the world. New York, NY: Rawson Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Set management: minimizing synchronization delays of prefabricated parts before assembly

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WSC '95: Proceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation
        December 1995
        1493 pages
        ISBN:0780330188

        Publisher

        IEEE Computer Society

        United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 December 1995

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        WSC '95 Paper Acceptance Rate122of183submissions,67%Overall Acceptance Rate3,413of5,075submissions,67%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader