ABSTRACT
As responsiveness becomes more of a competitive issue, knowledge of completion times of jobs and orders on the shop floor is key to the success and even survival of many manufacturing firms. We present two approaches-a fast sample path generation technique and a numerical technique-to determine the distribution of completion times of jobs in stochastic production environments. We compare our results with those obtained from conventional discrete event simulation and also compare speed of execution. We also show that the distribution obtained from the numerical integration technique provides a lower bound to the actual distribution of the completion times.
- Baker, K. R., 1984. Sequencing Rules and Due-date Assignments in a Job Shop, Management Science, 30(9): 1093-2004.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bertrand, j. W. M., 1983. Effect of Workload Dependent Due-dates on Job Shop Performance, Management Science, 29(7): 799-816.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bickel, P. J., K. A. Doksum, 1977. Mathematzcal Statistics: Basic Ideas and Selected Topzcs, Holden-Day Inc. CA.Google Scholar
- Bookbinder, J. H., A. I. Noor, 1985. Setting Job-shop Due-dates with Service-level Constraints, Journal of Operational Research Society, 36: 1017-1026.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Buzzacott, J. A., J. G. Shanthikumar, 1985. Approximate Queuing Models of Dynamic Job Shops, Management Science, 31(7): 870-887.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cheng, T. C. E., 1985. Analysis of Flow-time in a Job Shop, Journal of Operational Research Society, 36: 225-239.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eilon, S., I. G. Chowdhury, 1976. Due-dates in Job Shop Scheduling, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fisz, M., 1963. Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
- Fleming P. J., B. Simon, 1991. Interpolation Approximation of Sojourn Time Distributions, Operations Research, 39(2): 251-260. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fry, T. D., P. R. Philipoom, R. E. Markland, 1989. Due-date Assignment in a Multi-stage Job Shop", IIE Transactions, 21(2).Google Scholar
- Hasan, C. N., 1991. MACSim 1.0: User's and Programmer's Manual, Unpublished Master's thesis, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
- Jackson, J. R., 1963. Job-shop Like Queueing Systems, Management Science, 10(1): 131-142.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karmarkar, U. S., 1993. Manufacturing Lead Times, Order Release and Capacity Loading, In Handbooks in OR ~d MS, Vol. 4, 287-329, S. C. Graves el al., eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Kleinrock, L., 1975. Queueing Systems, Volume I: Theory, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kotiah, T. C. T., 1978. Approximate Transient Analysis of Some Queuing Systems, Operat,ons Research, 26(2).Google Scholar
- Kou|amas C. P., 1992. Exact Expressions for the First Two Moments of Job Flow Time in a Job Shop, Journal of Operational Research Society, 43(9).Google Scholar
- Miyazaki, S., 1981. Combined Scheduling System for Reducing Job Tardiness in a Job Shop, Internatzonal Journal of Productzon Research, Vol. 19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mori, M., 1976. Transient Behavior of the Mean Waiting Time and Its Exact Forms in M/M/1 and M/D/1 Queues, Journal of Operatzonal Research Society, Japan, 19(1).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pack, C. D., 1978. The Output of a Multiserver Queueing System, Operations Research, 26(3): 492-509.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ross, S. M., 1983. Stochastic Processes, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- Rubinstein, R. Y., 1986. Monte Carlo Optimization, Simulation and Sensitivity of Queueing Networks, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saboo, S., L. Wang, W. E. Wilhelm, 1989. Recursion Models For Describing and Managing the Transient Flow of Materials in Generalized Flowlines, Managemenl Sczence, 35(6): 722-742. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schmeiser, B., W. T. Song, 1989. inversetransformation Algorithms for Some Common Stochastic Processes, Proceedings of the 1989 Winter Simulation Conference, E. A. MacNair, K. J. Musselman, P. Heidelberger, eds. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seidmann, A., M. L. Smith, 1981. Due-date Assignment for Production Systems, Management Science, 27(5): 571-580.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shanthikumar, J. G., U. Sumita, 1988. Time Spent in a Dynamic Job Shop, International Journal of Productzon Research, 26(8): 1329-1352.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spearman, M. L., R. Q. Zhang, 1994. Optimal Lead Times in Manufacturing Systems, working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
- Sumita, U., 1981. Development of the Laguerre Transform Method for Numerical Exploration of Applied Probability Models, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
- Taylor III, B. W., L. J. Moore, 1982. Estimating Job Flow-times in a Job Shop for Contractually Negotiated Due-dates, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weeks, J. A., 1979. A Simulation Study of Predictable Due-dates, Management Science, 25(4): 363-373.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weeks, J. K., J. S. Fryer, 1977. Methodology for Assigning Minimum cost Due-dates, Management Science, 23(8): 1362-1371.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wein, L. M., 1991. Due-date Setting and Priority Sequencing in a Multi-class M/G/1 Queue, Management Sczence, 37(7): 1018-1033. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wein, L. M., P. B. Chevalier, 1992. A Broader View of the Job-shop Scheduling Problem, Management Sczence, 38(7). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Whitt, W., 1983. The Queueing Network Analyzer, Bell Systems Technzcal Journal, 62(9): 2779-2815.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Determining job completion time distributions in stochastic production environments
Recommendations
Minimizing Total Completion Time Subject to Job Release Dates and Preemption Penalties
Extensive research has been devoted to preemptive scheduling. However, little attention has been paid to problems where a certain time penalty must be incurred if preemption is allowed. In this paper, we consider the single-machine scheduling problem of ...
Scheduling for on-time completion in job shops using feasibility function
This article focuses on job shop type manufacturing systems where a high variety of product of different volumes are requested to be produce on a tight due date. The feasibility function (FF) is addressed in this article to schedule jobs in multi-...
Minimizing total completion time on uniform machines with deadline constraints
Consider n independent jobs and m uniform machines in parallel. Each job has a processing requirement and a deadline. All jobs are available for processing at time t = 0. Job j must complete its processing before or at its deadline and preemptions are ...
Comments