skip to main content
10.1145/224401.224740acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Determining job completion time distributions in stochastic production environments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 1995Publication History

ABSTRACT

As responsiveness becomes more of a competitive issue, knowledge of completion times of jobs and orders on the shop floor is key to the success and even survival of many manufacturing firms. We present two approaches-a fast sample path generation technique and a numerical technique-to determine the distribution of completion times of jobs in stochastic production environments. We compare our results with those obtained from conventional discrete event simulation and also compare speed of execution. We also show that the distribution obtained from the numerical integration technique provides a lower bound to the actual distribution of the completion times.

References

  1. Baker, K. R., 1984. Sequencing Rules and Due-date Assignments in a Job Shop, Management Science, 30(9): 1093-2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bertrand, j. W. M., 1983. Effect of Workload Dependent Due-dates on Job Shop Performance, Management Science, 29(7): 799-816.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bickel, P. J., K. A. Doksum, 1977. Mathematzcal Statistics: Basic Ideas and Selected Topzcs, Holden-Day Inc. CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bookbinder, J. H., A. I. Noor, 1985. Setting Job-shop Due-dates with Service-level Constraints, Journal of Operational Research Society, 36: 1017-1026.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Buzzacott, J. A., J. G. Shanthikumar, 1985. Approximate Queuing Models of Dynamic Job Shops, Management Science, 31(7): 870-887.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cheng, T. C. E., 1985. Analysis of Flow-time in a Job Shop, Journal of Operational Research Society, 36: 225-239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Eilon, S., I. G. Chowdhury, 1976. Due-dates in Job Shop Scheduling, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Fisz, M., 1963. Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fleming P. J., B. Simon, 1991. Interpolation Approximation of Sojourn Time Distributions, Operations Research, 39(2): 251-260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fry, T. D., P. R. Philipoom, R. E. Markland, 1989. Due-date Assignment in a Multi-stage Job Shop", IIE Transactions, 21(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasan, C. N., 1991. MACSim 1.0: User's and Programmer's Manual, Unpublished Master's thesis, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jackson, J. R., 1963. Job-shop Like Queueing Systems, Management Science, 10(1): 131-142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Karmarkar, U. S., 1993. Manufacturing Lead Times, Order Release and Capacity Loading, In Handbooks in OR ~d MS, Vol. 4, 287-329, S. C. Graves el al., eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleinrock, L., 1975. Queueing Systems, Volume I: Theory, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kotiah, T. C. T., 1978. Approximate Transient Analysis of Some Queuing Systems, Operat,ons Research, 26(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kou|amas C. P., 1992. Exact Expressions for the First Two Moments of Job Flow Time in a Job Shop, Journal of Operational Research Society, 43(9).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Miyazaki, S., 1981. Combined Scheduling System for Reducing Job Tardiness in a Job Shop, Internatzonal Journal of Productzon Research, Vol. 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Mori, M., 1976. Transient Behavior of the Mean Waiting Time and Its Exact Forms in M/M/1 and M/D/1 Queues, Journal of Operatzonal Research Society, Japan, 19(1).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Pack, C. D., 1978. The Output of a Multiserver Queueing System, Operations Research, 26(3): 492-509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ross, S. M., 1983. Stochastic Processes, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rubinstein, R. Y., 1986. Monte Carlo Optimization, Simulation and Sensitivity of Queueing Networks, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Saboo, S., L. Wang, W. E. Wilhelm, 1989. Recursion Models For Describing and Managing the Transient Flow of Materials in Generalized Flowlines, Managemenl Sczence, 35(6): 722-742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Schmeiser, B., W. T. Song, 1989. inversetransformation Algorithms for Some Common Stochastic Processes, Proceedings of the 1989 Winter Simulation Conference, E. A. MacNair, K. J. Musselman, P. Heidelberger, eds. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Seidmann, A., M. L. Smith, 1981. Due-date Assignment for Production Systems, Management Science, 27(5): 571-580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Shanthikumar, J. G., U. Sumita, 1988. Time Spent in a Dynamic Job Shop, International Journal of Productzon Research, 26(8): 1329-1352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Spearman, M. L., R. Q. Zhang, 1994. Optimal Lead Times in Manufacturing Systems, working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sumita, U., 1981. Development of the Laguerre Transform Method for Numerical Exploration of Applied Probability Models, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor III, B. W., L. J. Moore, 1982. Estimating Job Flow-times in a Job Shop for Contractually Negotiated Due-dates, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Weeks, J. A., 1979. A Simulation Study of Predictable Due-dates, Management Science, 25(4): 363-373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Weeks, J. K., J. S. Fryer, 1977. Methodology for Assigning Minimum cost Due-dates, Management Science, 23(8): 1362-1371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wein, L. M., 1991. Due-date Setting and Priority Sequencing in a Multi-class M/G/1 Queue, Management Sczence, 37(7): 1018-1033. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wein, L. M., P. B. Chevalier, 1992. A Broader View of the Job-shop Scheduling Problem, Management Sczence, 38(7). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Whitt, W., 1983. The Queueing Network Analyzer, Bell Systems Technzcal Journal, 62(9): 2779-2815.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Determining job completion time distributions in stochastic production environments

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                WSC '95: Proceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation
                December 1995
                1493 pages
                ISBN:0780330188

                Publisher

                IEEE Computer Society

                United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 December 1995

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                WSC '95 Paper Acceptance Rate122of183submissions,67%Overall Acceptance Rate3,413of5,075submissions,67%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader