The trend of e-democracy research: summary evidence and implications

ABSTRACT

The concept of e-democracy, although relatively new has received enormous attention in research especially with the global proliferation of information and communication technologies (ICT). Understanding such an emerging field of research with poorly defined boundaries, and constantly in the state of definition, redefinition, and evolution, is a crucial endeavor. We therefore seek to conduct a review of 158 articles of e-democracy published research, analyzing the progress in the research subject and reviewing the current trend and directions of the research. A grounded analysis of the selected articles led to the identification of critical knowledge gaps, recurring themes, and a roadmap that indicates the current state of e-democracy for development research. This will guide researchers and practitioners in this emerging field of study.

References

1. Albrecht, S. (2006). Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? A study of participation and representation in political debates on the Internet. Information Communication and Society, 9 (1),
2. Benyoucef, M., & Verrons, M. (2008). Configurable e-negotiation systems for large scale and transparent decision making. Springer Science. 17:211--224
3. Boateng, R., Hinson, R., Heeks, R. & Molla, A. (2008). E-commerce in least developing countries: summary evidence and implications. Journal of African Business, 9(2)
4. Caldow, J. (2004). E-democracy: Putting Down Global Roots Institute for Electronic Government, IEG.
5. Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing E-Democracy Back In: Why it Matters for Future Research on E-Governance. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 443--455.
6. Dahlberg, L. (2001). Democracy via Cyberspace. New Media and Society, 3(2), 157--177.
7. Dijk, K. H. J. v. (2000). Models of Democracy And Concepts Of Communication Digital Democracy. Issues Of Theory And Practice, 23(5).
8. Dobson, P. J. (2002). Critical realism and information systems research: Why bother with philosophy. Information Research, 7(2), 1--13
9. Dryzek, J. (1990). Pragmatism and Democracy: In Search of Deliberative Publics. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18(1), 72--79
10. Fink, A. (2005). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
11. Funilkul, S. & Chutimaskul, W. (2009). The framework for sustainable e-democracy development. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 3(1), 16--31.
12. Grönlund, K. (2007). Knowing and Not Knowing - The Internet and Political Information. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(3).
13. Henderson, M., Hogarth, F., & Jeans, D. (2007). Evaluation framework for assessing E-democracy policy. Electronic Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 3423--3430.
14. International Telecommunication Union, (2007). Telecommunication/ICT markets and Trends in Africa. ITU
15. Jayasena, G. N., & Karunaratna, D. D. (2007). Towards an enabling framework for e-democracy through the integration of citizen participation along the spatial dimension using free and open source technologies. Proceedings of the 24th South East Asia Regional Computer Conference, November 18--19, 2007, Bangkok, Thailand
16. Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). Towards a framework of literature review process in support of information systems research. Proceeding of the Informing Science Information Technology Education Conference 2006, Greater Manchester, UK
17. Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2006). Evaluating How E-participation Changes Local Democracy Paper presented at the eGovernment Workshop, Brunel University.
18. Mbarika, V. (2001). Africa's least developed countries' Teledensity problems and strategies. Yaounde, Cameroon: AGWECAMS Publishers.
19. Medaglia, R. (2007). Measuring the diffusion of eParticipation: A survey on Italian local government. Information Polity, 12, 265--280.
20. Nchise, A., Ngwa, O. & Mbarika, V. (2011). Toward a Sustainable E-Participation Model in Sub Saharan Africa. The planned Behavioral Perspective. International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, Austria
21. Okoli, C., & Mbarika, V. A. (2003). A framework for assessing E-commerce in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 6,44--66.
22. Panagiotopoulos, P. P., & Al-Debei, M. M. (2010). Engaging with Citizens Online: Understanding the Role of ePetitioning in Local Government Democracy Paper presented at the Internet, Politics, Policy 2010, St Anne's College, University of Oxford.
23. Parvez, Z. & Ahmed, P. (2006). Towards building an integrated perspective on e-democracy. Information, Communication & Society 9(5), 612--632.
24. Parvez, Z. (2003). Local Democracy Shaping E-Democracy. Electronic Government, 2739.
25. Parvez, Z. (2008). E-Democracy from the perspective of local elected members. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, (4) 3, 20--35.
26. Riley, C. G. (2002). The Changing Role of the Citizen in the E-Governance & E-Democracy Equation. Commonwealth Centre for e-Governance
27. Sabatier, P. (2007). Theories of the policy process, 2nd edition
28. Sabo, O., Rose, J., & Skiftenesflak, L. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400--428.
29. Svensson, J. and R. Leenes (2003). E-voting in Europe: Divergent democratic practice. Information Policy 8(1): 3--15.
30. Webster, J., & Waston, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26, 13--23.
31. Wilhem, J. (2000). Literacy by design. Voices from the Middlle. A publication of the National Council of Teachers of English. 7 (3) 4--14
32. Yiǧit, E. Ö., & ÇÇolak, K. (2010). The opinions of the pre-service teachers about e- democracy in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, (2) 2, 712--716.

• Applied computing