skip to main content
10.1145/2325616.2325635acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroitvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Who is on your sofa?: TV audience communities and second screening social networks

Published:04 July 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Television viewing coupled with audience interaction through a second screen has gained popularity as second screen capable devices have become more pervasive and affordable. In this paper, we investigate the nature of television audiences which engage in second screen interactions. Two different television show audiences are explored though their message activity while using the Twitter social blogging service. Connections are made between users when retweeting messages or mentioning other users in a message. The networks of viewers which are formed when viewers connect through these means reveal different characteristics within the audience networks and imply that different motivations for second screening while watching television shows are in play.

References

  1. Alfaro, S., Bove, M., Surround Vision -- A Hand-Held Screen for Accessing Peripheral Content around a Main Screen and Transfer Television Content, LNCS, 2011. 7069:324--345. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J., Mason, W., Watts, D., Identifying 'Influencers' on Twitter, WSDM 2011, ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, D., Golder, S., Lotan, G., Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter, HICSS2010, Jan 5--8, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cesar, P., Bulterman, D., Jansen, A., Usages of the Secondary Screen in an Interactive Television Environment: Control, Enrich, Share, and Transfer Television Content, LNCS, 2008, 5066:168--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cesar, P., Knoche, H., Bulterman, D., From One to Many Boxes: Mobile Devices as Primary and Secondary Screens, Human-Computer Interaction Series 2010, 6:327--348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benvenuto, F., Gummadi, K., Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy, In Proc. Fourth Int. AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media, AAAI.org, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chou, B., Suzuki, E., Discovering Community-Oriented Roles of Nodes in a Social Network, In Proc. DaWaK2010, Bilbao, Spain, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Doughty, M., Lawson, S., Rowland, D., Co-Viewing Live TV with Digital Backchannel Streams, in proc EuroITV2011, ACM Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Evangelia, M., Lekakos, G., Vrechopoulos, A., Social TV: Introducing Virtual Socialization in the TV Experience, uxTV'08, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fortunato, S., Castellano, C., Community Structure in Graphs, Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science, B. Meyers, ed., Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2008 (arXiv:0712.2716).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraginiaud, P., Giakkoupis, G., On the Searchability of Small-World Networks with Arbitrary Underlying Structure, STOC'10, ACM Press, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Girvan, M., Newman, M., Community Structure in Social and Biological Networks, PNAS 99:12 7821--7826, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gould, R., The Origins of Status Hierarchies: a Formal Theory and Empirical Test, .Am. J. Sociol. 107:1143--78, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hermida, A., From TV to Twitter: How Ambient News became Ambient Journalism, Media/Culture 13:2, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S., What is Twitter, a Social Network or News Media? In Proc. WWW'10, ACM Press, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Laniado, D., Mika, P., Making Sense of Twitter, ISWC 2010, in LNCS 2010, 6496:470--485, Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lin, J., Pena, J., Are you Following Me? A Content Analysis Of TV Networks' Brand Communication On Twitter, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12:1, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Marwick, A., Boyd, D., I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse and the Imagined Audience, New Media & Society 13:1 114--133, Sage Journals.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mitchell, K., Jones, A., Ishmael, J., Race, N., Social TV: Toward Content Navigation Using Social Awareness, in proc. EuroITV2010 ACM Press, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Oehlberg, L., Ducheneaut, N., Thornton, J., Moore, R., Nickell, E., Social TV: Designing for Distributed, Sociable Television Viewing, in proc. EuroITV2006, ACM Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rivera, M., Soderstrom, S., Uzzi, B., Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational and Proximity Mechanisms, Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2010. 36:91 -- 115Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Scott, J., Social Network Analysis, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, London, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sena, H., Dias, R., de Melo, J., Burlamaqui, A., Trend TV: An Architecture for Automatic Change of TV Channels Based on Social Networks with Multiple Device Support, IEEE VECIMS 2011, Ottawa, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Stefanone, M., Lackaff, D., Rosen, D., The Relationship between Traditional Mass Media and "Social Media": Reality Television as a Model for Social Network Site Behavior, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 54:3 508--525, Taylor Francis, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Twitter blog: Watching Together: Twitter and TV, http://blog.twitter.com/2011/05/watching-together-twitter-and-tv.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Twitter API Documentation, https://dev.twitter.com/docs/streaming-api/conceptsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Valente, T., Fujimoto, K., Bridging: Locating Critical Connectors in a Network, Soc. Networks 32:3 212--220, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Wilson, C., Boe, B., Sala, A., Puttaswamy, K., Zhao, B., User Interactions in Social Networks and their Implications, in proc EuroSys'09, ACM Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wohn, Y., Na, E., Tweeting About TV: Sharing Television Viewing Experiences via Social Media Message Streams, First Monday, 16:3, March 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Wu, S., Hofman, J., Mason, W., Watts, D., Who Says What to Whom on Twitter, in proc. WWW'11, ACM press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Who is on your sofa?: TV audience communities and second screening social networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EuroITV '12: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video
      July 2012
      240 pages
      ISBN:9781450311076
      DOI:10.1145/2325616

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 July 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      EuroITV '12 Paper Acceptance Rate31of91submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate52of149submissions,35%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader