skip to main content
10.1145/2330163.2330350acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The choice of the offspring population size in the (1,λ) EA

Published:07 July 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We extend the theory of non-elitist evolutionary algorithms (EAs) by considering the offspring population size in the (1,λ) EA. We establish a sharp threshold at λ = log{\frac{e}{e-1}} n ≈5 log10 n between exponential and polynomial running times on OneMax. For any smaller value, the (1,λ) EA needs exponential time on every function that has only one global optimum. We also consider arbitrary unimodal functions and show that the threshold can shift towards larger offspring population sizes. Finally, we investigate the relationship between the offspring population size and arbitrary mutation rates on OneMax. We get sharp thresholds for λ that decrease with the mutation rate. This illustrates the balance between selection and mutation.

References

  1. B. Doerr, D. Johannsen, and C. Winzen. Drift analysis and linear functions revisited. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '10), pages 1449--1456. ACM Press, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Doerr, D. Johannsen, and C. Winzen. Multiplicative drift analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2010), pages 1--8. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. He and X. Yao. A study of drift analysis for estimating computation time of evolutionary algorithms. Natural Computing, 3(1):21--35, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Jägersküpper and T. Storch. When the plus strategy outperforms the comma strategy and when not. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computational Intelligence, FOCI 2007, pages 25--32. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. T. Jansen, K. A. De Jong, and I. Wegener. On the choice of the offspring population size in evolutionary algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, 13:413--440, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Johannsen. Random Combinatorial Structures and Randomized Search Heuristics. PhD thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Lässig and D. Sudholt. General scheme for analyzing running times of parallel evolutionary algorithms. In 11th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN 2010), pages 234--243. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. K. Lehre. Fitness-levels for non-elitist populations. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '11), pages 2075--2082. ACM Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. K. Lehre. Negative drift in populations. In 11th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN 2010), pages 244--253. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. K. Lehre and X. Yao. On the impact of mutation-selection balance on the runtime of evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2012. To appear.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Mitavskiy, J. Rowe, and C. Cannings. Theoretical analysis of local search strategies to optimize network communication subject to preserving the total number of links. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 2(2):243--284, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. F. Neumann, P. S. Oliveto, and C. Witt. Theoretical analysis of fitness-proportional selection: landscapes and efficiency. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO'09), pages 835--842, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. Neumann, D. Sudholt, and C. Witt. A few ants are enough: ACO with iteration-best update. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '10), pages 63--70, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. P. Niculescu and A. Vernescu. A two-sided estimate of eχ - (1+χn)n. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 5(3), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. P. Oliveto. Computational Complexity Analysis of Evolutionary Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimisation. PhD thesis, Univ. Birmingham, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. S. Oliveto and C. Witt. Simplified drift analysis for proving lower bounds in evolutionary computation. Algorithmica, 59(3):369--386, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. J. Quick, V. J. Rayward-Smith, and G. D. Smith. Fitness distance correlation and ridge functions. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN V), pages 77--86. Springer, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Sudholt. General lower bounds for the running time of evolutionary algorithms. In 11th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN 2010), pages 124--133. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C. Witt. Optimizing Linear Functions with Randomized Search Heuristics - The Robustness of Mutation. In 29th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2012), pages 420--431, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The choice of the offspring population size in the (1,λ) EA

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '12: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
      July 2012
      1396 pages
      ISBN:9781450311779
      DOI:10.1145/2330163

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 July 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader