skip to main content
10.1145/2330601.2330661acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration

Published:29 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Growing interest in data and analytics in education, teaching, and learning raises the priority for increased, high-quality research into the models, methods, technologies, and impact of analytics. Two research communities -- Educational Data Mining (EDM) and Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) have developed separately to address this need. This paper argues for increased and formal communication and collaboration between these communities in order to share research, methods, and tools for data mining and analysis in the service of developing both LAK and EDM fields.

References

  1. Mayer, M. (2009) Innovation at Google: The physics of data {PARC forum} (11 August, 2009: 3:59 mark). Available from < http://www.slideshare.net/PARCInc/innovation-at-google-the-physics-of-data>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Koedinger, K. R., Baker, R. S. J. d., Cunningham, K., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., Stamper, J. (2010) A Data Repository for the EDM community: The PSLC DataShop. In Romero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M., Baker, R. S. J. d. (Eds.)Handbook of Educational Data Mining. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp.43--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Romero, C., Ventura, S. (2007). Educational Data Mining: A Survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 125--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Baker, R. S. J. d., Yacef, K. (2009) The State of Educational Data Mining in 2009: A Review and Future Visions. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1 (1), 3--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gasevic, D., Conole, G., Siemens, G., Long, P. (Eds). (2011) LAK11: International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Banff, Canada, 27 February - 1 March 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Romero, C., Ventura, S. (2010) Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State-of-the-Art. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews. 40 (6), 601--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Romero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizky, M., Baker, R. (2010) Handbook of Educational Data Mining. 2010. Editorial Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Michael O. Moorman

    This interesting paper addresses a valid area of concern. The overall conclusion reached by the authors, that the two disciplinary areas of educational data mining (EDM) and learning analytics and knowledge (LAK) should collaborate more, is certainly true. These two areas are parts of a whole that were created by looking at the same thing from different perspectives. However, it seems to me that the authors are perhaps a little behind the times. There are multiple examples extant in the scientific literature and news media that describe the use of analytics for a variety of purposes, including assisting leaders in making better decisions. It is laudable that the authors believe that, to the extent EDM and LAK can jointly articulate quality standards for research in this area, it may be possible to more effectively communicate these standards to the wider community of tool developers, analytics practitioners, and the broader research community. The research and methods from these two disciplines are certainly valuable in the educational field. They deserve a place among the approaches available to assist educational leaders in the creation of better educational opportunities for all. However, the individual disciplinary areas need to be organized to more closely align with each other. That will make it easier to work on articulating quality standards outside these areas, hopefully under the umbrella of a more broadly based organization such as the ACM. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      LAK '12: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
      April 2012
      282 pages
      ISBN:9781450311113
      DOI:10.1145/2330601

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 April 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader