skip to main content
10.1145/2336727.2336731acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personalised gaming: a motivation and overview of literature

Published:21 July 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article focuses on personalised games, which we define as games that utilise player models for the purpose of tailoring the game experience to the individual player. The main contribution of the article is a motivation for personalised gaming, supported by an extensive overview of scientific literature. The motivatin concerns (a) the psychological foundation, (b) the effect on player satisfaction, (c) the contribution to game development, and (d) the requirement for achieving ambitions. The provided overview of scientific literature goes into the subject of player modelling, as well as eight adaptive components: (1) space adaptation, (2) mission/task adaptation, (3) character adaptation, (4) game mechanics adaptation, (5) narrative adaptation, (6) music/sound adaptation, (7) player matching (multiplayer), and (8) difficulty scaling. In the concluding sections, the relationship to procedural content generation is discussed, as well as the generalisation to other domains.

References

  1. E. Adams and A. Rollings. Fundamentals of Game Design. Game Design and Development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, sep 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. W. Aha, M. Molineaux, and M. J. V. Ponsen. Learning to win: Case-based plan selection in a real-time strategy game. In H. Muñoz-Avila and F. Ricci, editors, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR 2005), pages 5--20. DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. Auslander, S. Lee-Urban, C. Hogg, and H. Muñoz-Avila. Recognizing the enemy: Combining reinforcement learning with strategy selection using case-based reasoning. In K.-D. Althoff, R. Bergmann, M. Minor, and A. Hanft, editors, Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR 2008), pages 59--73. University of Trier, Trier, Germany, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. C. J. Bakkes. Rapid Adaptation of Video Games AI. PhD thesis, Tilburg centre for Creative Computing (TiCC), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. C. J. Bakkes, P. H. M. Spronck, and H. J. Van den Herik. Opponent modelling for case-based adaptive game AI. Entertainment Computing, 1(1):27--37, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. C. J. Bakkes, P. H. M. Spronck, and H. J. Van den Herik. Rapid and reliable adaptation of video game AI. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 1(2):93--104, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. C. J. Bakkes, P. H. M. Spronck, and G. van Lankveld. Player behavioural modelling for video games. Entertainment Computing, 2012. Special Issue on Games and AI. 10.1016/j.entcom.2011.12.001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Bartle. Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit muds. Journal of MUD research, 1(1):19, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Baumgarten, S. Colton, and M. Morris. Combining AI methods for learning bots in a real-time strategy game. International Journal on Computer Game Technologies, 2009, 2009. Article ID 129075. Special issue on Artificial Intelligence for Computer Games.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Belinkie. Video game music: not just kid stuff. Video Game Music, 15, 1999. {Online} Available: http://www.vastdifference.com/nintendo/nsf/research/Video%20game%20music_%20not%20just%20kid%20stuff.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Booth. The ai systems of left 4 dead. In Keynote, Fifth Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference (AIIDE09), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Bostan and T. Marsh. The Śinteractivešof interactive storytelling: Customizing the gaming experience. Entertainment Computing-ICEC 2010, pages 472--475, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Buro and T. M. Furtak. RTS games and real-time AI research. In Proceedings of the Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation Conference (BRIMS), pages 34--41. Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO), Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Carver and M. Scheier. Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological review, 97(1):19, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. D. Charles and M. Black. Dynamic player modeling: A framework for player-centered digital games. In Q. H. Mehdi, N. E. Gough, and D. Al-Dabass, editors, Proceedings of Computer Games: Artificial Intelligence, Design and Education (CGAIDE 2004), pages 29--35. University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Charles, A. Kerr, M. McAlister, M. McNeil, J. Kücklich, M. Black, A. Moore, and K. Stringer. Player-centred game design: Adaptive digital games. In Changing Views: Worlds in Play (DIGRA 2005 Conference), pages 103--423, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Charles, M. McNeill, M. McAlister, M. Black, A. Moore, K. Stringer, J. Kucklich, and A. Kerr. Player-centered design: Player modeling and adaptive digital games. In Proceedings of the DiGRA Conference.: Changing Views - World in Play, pages 285--298, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Chiou and K. Wong. Player adaptive entertainment computing (paec): mechanism to model user satisfaction by using neuro linguistic programming (nlp) techniques. In Computational Intelligence and Games, 2008. CIG'08. IEEE Symposium On, pages 343--349. IEEE, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Cohen. The functions of music in multimedia: A cognitive approach. Music, mind, and science, pages 53--69, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. B. Cousins. Elementary game design. Develop magazine, 10 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. B. Cowley, D. Charles, M. Black, and R. Hickey. User-system-experience model for user centered design in computer games. In Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, pages 419--424. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. B. Cowley, D. Charles, M. Black, and R. Hickey. Toward an understanding of flow in video games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 6(2):20, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. Crawford. Chris Crawford on Interactive Storytelling (New Riders Games). New Riders Games, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. N. Dansey, B. Stevens, and R. Eglin. Contextually-ambiguous pervasive games: an exploratory study. Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. Proceedings of DiGRA 2009, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. W. Darley and J. Lim. The effect of consumers' emotional reactions on behavioral intention: The moderating role of personal relevance and self-monitoring. Psychology and Marketing, 9(4):329--346, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. P. Demasi and A. J. de. O. Cruz. Online coevolution for action games. International Journal of Intelligent Games and Simulation, 2(3):80--88, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Digman. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual review of psychology, 41(1):417--440, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. H. H. L. M. Donkers, J. W. H. M. Uiterwijk, and H. J. Van den Herik. Probabilistic opponent-model search. Information Sciences, 135(3--4):123--149, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. H. H. L. M. Donkers, J. W. H. M. Uiterwijk, and H. J. Van den Herik. Admissibility in opponent-model search. Information Sciences, 154(3--4):119--140, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. Dormans. Adventures in level design: Generating missions and spaces for action adventure games. In Proceedings of the Foundations of Digital Games Conference (FDG), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. J. Dormans. Engineering emergence: applied theory for game design. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Dormans and S. C. J. Bakkes. Generating missions and spaces for adaptable play experiences. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 3(3):216--228, sep 2011. Special Issue on Procedural Content Generation, DOI 10.1109/TCIAIG.2011.2149523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. J. Douglas and A. Hargadon. The pleasures of immersion and engagement: Schemas, scripts and the fifth business. Digital Creativity, 12(3):153--166, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. M. S. El-Nasr. Interaction, narrative, and drama: Creating an adaptive interactive narrative using performance arts theories. Interaction Studies, 8(2):209--240, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. M. Eladhari, R. Nieuwdorp, and M. Fridenfalk. The soundtrack of your mind: Mind music-adaptive audio for game characters. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology, page 54. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. A. Elo. The rating of chessplayers, past and present, volume 3. Batsford London, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. X. Fang and F. Zhao. Personality and enjoyment of computer game play. Computers in Industry, 61(4):342--349, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. P. Fischer, T. Greitemeyer, T. Morton, A. Kastenmüller, T. Postmes, D. Frey, J. Kubitzki, and J. Odenwälder. The racing-game effect: Why do video racing games increase risk-taking inclinations? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(10):1395--1409, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. P. Fischer, A. Kastenmüller, and T. Greitemeyer. Media violence and the self: The impact of personalized gaming characters in aggressive video games on aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1):192--195, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. N. Frijda. The Emotions. Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. J. Fürnkranz. Recent advances in machine learning and game playing. ÖGAI-Journal, 26(2):19--28, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. A. Gabrielsson and E. Lindström. The influence of musical structure on emotional expression. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. M. Glickman. The glicko system. Boston University, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. S. Göbel, V. Wendel, C. Ritter, and R. Steinmetz. Personalized, adaptive digital educational games using narrative game-based learning objects. Entertainment for Education. Digital Techniques and Systems, pages 438--445, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. T. Graepel and R. Herbrich. Ranking and matchmaking. Game Developer Magazine, pages 25--34, 2006. October, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. T. Graepel, R. Herbrich, and J. Gold. Learning to fight. In Q. H. Mehdi, N. E. Gough, and D. Al-Dabass, editors, Proceedings of Computer Games: Artificial Intelligence, Design and Education (CGAIDE 2004), pages 193--200. University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. T. Greitemeyer, M. Agthe, R. Turner, and C. Gschwendtner. Acting prosocially reduces retaliation: Effects of prosocial video games on aggressive behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. T. Greitemeyer and S. Osswald. Effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2):211, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. T. Greitemeyer, S. Osswald, and M. Brauer. Playing prosocial video games increases empathy and decreases schadenfreude. Emotion, 10(6):796, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. R. Herbrich, T. Minka, and T. Graepel. TrueskillŹ: A bayesian skill rating system. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 19:569, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. J. Hollingdale and T. Greitemeyer. The changing face of aggression: The effect of personalized avatars in a violent video game on levels of aggressive behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2012. In press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. R. Houlette. Player modeling for adaptive games. In AI Game Programming Wisdom 2, pages 557--566. Charles River Media, Inc., Hingham, Massachusetts, USA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. R. Hunicke and V. Chapman. AI for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games. In AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game Artificial Intelligence, pages 91--96. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, USA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. C. Izard. Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual review of psychology, 60:1, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. R. Krekel. Interview on game on television program, 2012. #5, February 13th, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. A. L. Kristof. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1):1--49, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. J. E. Laird and M. Van Lent. Human-level AI's killer application: Interactive computer games. AI Magazine, 22(2):15--25, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. R. Laursen and D. Nielsen. Investigating small scale combat situations in real-time-strategy computer games. Master's thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. R. Lazarus. Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, USA, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. L. Lidén. Artificial stupidity: The art of making intentional mistakes. In S. Rabin, editor, AI Game Programming Wisdom 2, pages 41--48. Charles River Media, Inc., Hingham, Massachusetts, USA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. C. Lindley and C. Sennersten. Game play schemas: from player analysis to adaptive game mechanics. In Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Game research and development, pages 47--53. Murdoch University, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. D. Livingstone and D. Charles. Intelligent interfaces for digital games. In D. Fu, S. Henke, and J. Orkin, editors, Proceedings of the AAAI-04 Workshop on Challenges in Game Artificial Intelligence, pages 6--10, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. S. Livingstone and A. Brown. Dynamic response: real-time adaptation for music emotion. In Proceedings of the second Australasian conference on Interactive entertainment, pages 105--111. Creativity & Cognition Studios Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. R. Lopes and R. Bidarra. Adaptivity challenges in games and simulations: a survey. Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, IEEE Transactions on, 3(2):85--99, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. C. Lutz. Unnatural emotions: everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll & their challenge to western theory. University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. S. Mahamad, E. Mazlan, R. Kasbon, K. Khalid, and N. Rusdi. Personalised mobile picture puzzle. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 25:233--238, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. G. Mandler. Mind and body: Psychology of emotion and stress. WW Norton New York, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. L. Manovich. The Language of New Media. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. M. Mateas and A. Stern. Procedural authorship: A case-study of the interactive drama Façade. Digital Arts and Culture (DAC), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. R. McCrae and P. Costa Jr. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist; American Psychologist, 52(5):509, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. B. Medler. Using recommendation systems to adapt gameplay. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 1(3):2009, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. I. Millington. Artificial Intelligence for Games. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, California, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. P. D. Molyneux. The future of game AI - Lecture. Imperial College London, London, UK, 2006. October 4, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. L. Nacke, M. Grimshaw, and C. Lindley. More than a feeling: Measurement of sonic user experience and psychophysiology in a first-person shooter game. Interacting with Computers, 22(5):336--343, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. M. Nelson and M. Mateas. Towards automated game design. AI* IA 2007: Artificial Intelligence and Human-Oriented Computing, pages 626--637, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. J. K. Olesen, G. N. Yannakakis, and J. Hallam. Real-time challenge balance in an RTS game using rtNEAT. In P. Hingston and L. Barone, editors, Proceedings of the IEEE 2008 Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG'08), pages 87--94, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. B. Parkinson. Emotions are social. British journal of psychology, 87(4):663--683, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. C. Pedersen, J. Togelius, and G. N. Yannakakis. Modeling Player Experience for Content Creation. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 1(2):121--133, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. N. Peirce, O. Conlan, and V. Wade. Adaptive educational games: Providing non-invasive personalised learning experiences. In Digital Games and Intelligent Toys Based Education, 2008 Second IEEE International Conference on, pages 28--35. Ieee, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. N. Peirce and V. Wade. Personalised learning for casual games: The'language trap'online language learning game. In 4th European Conference on Game Based Learning (ECGBL), Copenhagen, Denmark, pages 21--22, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. R. Petty and J. Cacioppo. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(10):1915, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. R. Petty, J. Cacioppo, and D. Schumann. Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of consumer research, pages 135--146, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. M. Pignatiello, C. Camp, and L. Rasar. Musical mood induction: An alternative to the velten technique. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(3):295--297, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. S. Rabin. Preface. In S. Rabin, editor, AI Game Programming Wisdom 4, pages ix--xi. Charles River Media, Inc., Hingham, Massachusetts, USA, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. M. Riedl. Scalable personalization of interactive experiences through creative automation. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 8(4):26, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. M. Riedl and A. Stern. Believable agents and intelligent story adaptation for interactive storytelling. Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment, pages 1--12, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. M. Riedl, D. Thue, and V. Bulitko. Game AI as storytelling. Artificial Intelligence for Computer Games, 125, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. M. Rosaldo. Toward an anthropology of self and feeling. Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. M. Ryan. Narrative as virtual reality: Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, MD, USA, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. K. Salen and E. Zimmerman. Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. The MIT Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. B. Schmidt. Designing sound tracks for coin-op games or computer music for under $65.00. In Proceedings of the 1989 International Computer Music Conference, pages 273--276. Ann Arbor, MI: MPublishing, University of Michigan Library, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. B. Schouten, R. Tieben, A. Ven, and D. Schouten. Human behavior analysis in ambient gaming and playful interaction. Computer Analysis of Human Behavior, pages 387--403, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. S. Schreurs. The road to adaptive gameplay. Master's thesis, Tilburg University, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. B. Scott. The illusion of intelligence. In S. Rabin, editor, AI Game Programming Wisdom, pages 16--20. Charles River Media, Inc., Hingham, Massachusetts, USA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. M. Sharma, M. Holmes, J. Santamaria, A. Irani, C. Isbell, and A. Ram. Transfer learning in real-time strategy games using hybrid CBR/RL. In M. M. Veloso, editor, Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007), pages 1041--1046. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. M. Sharma, M. Mehta, S. Ontanón, and A. Ram. Player modeling evaluation for interactive fiction. In Proceedings of the AIIDE 2007 Workshop on Optimizing Player Satisfaction, pages 19--24, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. A. M. Smith, C. Lewis, K. Hullet, G. Smith, and A. Sullivan. An inclusive view of player modeling, 2011. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. G. Smith, M. Treanor, J. Whitehead, and M. Mateas. Rhythm-based level generation for 2D platformers. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, Orlando, FL, pages 175--182, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. P. H. M. Spronck. Adaptive Game AI. PhD thesis, Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. P. H. M. Spronck, I. G. Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, and E. O. Postma. Difficulty scaling of game AI. In A. E. Rhalibi and D. Van Welden, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Games and Simulation (GAMEON'2004), pages 33--37. EUROSIS-ETI, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. P. H. M. Spronck, I. G. Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, and E. O. Postma. Online adaptation of game opponent AI with dynamic scripting. International Journal of Intelligent Games and Simulation, 3(1):45--53, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. A. Stern. Ai beyond computer games. In AAAI AI and Interactive Entertainment Spring Symposium 2000, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. J. Stewart. Different approaches to implementating player centered game design: A comparison study, 2007. Bachelor's thesis, Murdoch University, Mount Hawthorn, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. S. Sundar. Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology, pages 89--104, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. J. Sykes and M. Federoff. Player-centred game design. In CHI'06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1731--1734. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. J. Tanenbaum. Imagining new design spaces for interactive digital storytelling. Interactive Storytelling, pages 261--271, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. J. Tanenbaum and A. Tomizu. Affective interaction design and narrative presentation. In AAAI 2007 Fall Symposium on Intelligent Narrative Technologies, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. J. Tanenbaum and A. Tomizu. Narrative meaning creation in interactive storytelling. International Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. L. N. Taylor. Video games: Perspective, point-of-view, and immersion. Master's thesis, Graduate Art School, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. C. Teng. Customization, immersion satisfaction, and online gamer loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6):1547--1554, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. D. Thue, V. Bulitko, M. Spetch, and E. Wasylishen. Interactive storytelling: A player modelling approach. In Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment conference, Stanford, CA, pages 43--48, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. D. J. Thue, V. Bulitko, and M. Spetch. Player modeling for interactive storytelling: A practical approach. In S. Rabin, editor, AI Game Programming Wisdom 4, pages 633--646. Charles River Media, Inc., Hingham, Massachusetts, USA, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. J. Togelius, R. De Nardi, and S. Lucas. Towards automatic personalised content creation for racing games. In Computational Intelligence and Games, 2007. CIG 2007. IEEE Symposium on, pages 252--259. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. J. Togelius, M. Preuss, and G. N. Yannakakis. Towards multiobjective procedural map generation. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, Monterey, CA, page #3, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. S. Turkay and S. Adinolf. Free to be me: a survey study on customization with world of warcraft and city of heroes/villains players. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2):1840--1845, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. H. J. Van den Herik, H. H. L. M. Donkers, and P. H. M. Spronck. Opponent modelling and commercial games. In G. Kendall and S. Lucas, editors, Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG'05), pages 15--25, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. G. Van Lankveld, P. H. M. Spronck, and H. J. Van den Herik. Incongruity-based adaptive game balancing. In H. J. Van den Herik and P. H. M. Spronck, editors, Proceedings of the 12th Advances in Computer Games conference (ACG12), pages 208--220, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Z. Whalen. Play along-an approach to videogame music. Game Studies, 4(1), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. G. N. Yannakakis. How to model and augment player satisfaction: A review. In K. Berkling, D. Giuliani, and A. Potamianos, editors, Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Child, Computer and Interaction (ICMI'08 post-conference workshop), page (Invited paper). ACM Press, Montreal, Canada, oct 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. G. N. Yannakakis and J. Hallam. Towards optimizing entertainment in computer games. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 21(10):933--971, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  121. G. N. Yannakakis, M. Maragoudakis, and J. Hallam. Preference learning for cognitive modeling: a case study on entertainment preferences. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 39(6):1165--1175, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. G. N. Yannakakis and J. Togelius. Experience-driven procedural content generation. Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 2(3):147--161, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. N. Yee. Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6):772--775, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. D. Zad, M. Angelides, and H. Agius. Personalise your massively multiplayer online game (mmog) with artemis. Multimedia Systems, pages 1--26, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Personalised gaming: a motivation and overview of literature

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IE '12: Proceedings of The 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the System
          July 2012
          182 pages
          ISBN:9781450314107
          DOI:10.1145/2336727

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 July 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate64of148submissions,43%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader