How responsiveness affects players' perception in digital games

ABSTRACT

Digital games with realistic virtual characters have become very popular. The ability for players to promptly control their character is a crucial feature of these types of games, be it platform games, first-person shooters, or role-playing games. Delays in the responsiveness of a player's character, for example due to extensive AI calculations or to network latencies, can considerably reduce the player's enjoyment of a game. In this paper, we present a thorough analysis of the consequences of such delays on the players' experience across two games with different levels of difficulty. We investigate the effects of responsiveness on the player's experience, performance, and perception of the virtual character, as well as the player's adaptability to delays. We find that delay affects the enjoyment of the games as well as the performance, but only becomes really important when a game becomes more challenging. Furthermore, players can get used to delay within a few minutes of play, so that their performance does not significantly differ from players without a delay handicap.

References

1. Beznosyk, A., Quax, P., Coninx, K., and Lamotte, W. 2011. Influence of network delay and jitter on cooperation in multiplayer games. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry, ACM, New York, NY, USA, VRCAI '11, 351--354.
2. Canossa, A., Drachen, A., and Sørensen, J. R. M. 2011. Arrrgghh!!!: blending quantitative and qualitative methods to detect player frustration. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, ACM, New York, NY, USA, FDG '11, 61--68.
3. Carter, E. J., Sharan, L., Trutoiu, L., Matthews, I., and Hodgins, J. K. 2010. Perceptually motivated guidelines for voice synchronization in film. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 7, 4 (July), 23:1--23:12.
4. Claypool, M., and Claypool, K. 2006. Latency and player actions in online games. Communications of the ACM 49, 11 (Nov.), 40--45.
5. Dick, M., Wellnitz, O., and Wolf, L. 2005. Analysis of factors affecting players' performance and perception in multiplayer games. In Proceedings of 4th ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Network and system support for games, ACM, New York, NY, USA, NetGames '05, 1--7.
6. ESA, 2011. Entertainment Software Association. Essential facts about the computer and video game industry: sales, demographic and usage data. http://www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_EF_2008.pdf, accessed April 2012.
7. Fritsch, T., Ritter, H., and Schiller, J. 2005. The effect of latency and network limitations on mmorpgs: A field study of everquest 2. In Proceedings of 4th ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Network and system support for games, ACM, New York, NY, USA, NetGames '05.
8. Gleicher, M. 2008. More motion capture in games can we make example-based approaches scale? In Motion in Games, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, vol. 5277 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 82--93.
9. McDonnell, R., Ennis, C., Dobbyn, S., and O'Sullivan, C. 2009. Talking bodies: Sensitivity to desynchronization of conversations. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 6, 4 (Oct.), 22:1--22:8.
10. Sheldon, N., Girard, E., Borg, S., Claypool, M., and Agu, E. 2003. The effect of latency on user performance in warcraft iii. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Network and system support for games, ACM, New York, NY, USA, NetGames '03, 3--14.
11. Wattimena, A. F., Kooij, R. E., van Vugt, J. M., and Ahmed, O. K. 2006. Predicting the perceived quality of a first person shooter: the quake iv g-model. In Proceedings of 5th ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Network and system support for games, ACM, New York, NY, USA, NetGames '06.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Computer graphics

    • Animation