skip to main content
10.1145/2346536.2346597acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effect of user-generated content on website stickiness: the case of social shopping communities

Published:07 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Website stickiness, that is visit duration, is a key performance metric for website managers. Longer visit durations can enhance user involvement and give users more time to complete purchase transactions. Furthermore, exposure to advertising is more likely with longer visit durations. By analyzing clickstream data, we investigate which factors, especially user-generated social-shopping features, are significant for predicting visit duration within social shopping communities (SSCs).

SSCs evolve from an integration of social networking and online shopping. Both are currently experiencing high growth-rates in consumer popularity. For example, polyvore.com presently attracts more than 13 million unique visitors per month. Apart from direct-shopping features in shopbots, e.g., search field and search filters, SSCs additionally offer user-generated social-shopping features. These include recommendation lists, ratings, styles (i.e., assortments arranged by users), tags, and user profiles. Purchases can be made by following a link to a participating online shop ('click-out').

Our regression model includes 2.91 million visiting sessions and shows that user-generated social-shopping features exert a significant impact on visit duration. The more lists, styles, tags, and user profiles used, the longer the duration. Thus, these features seem to enhance site stickiness and browsing. As assumed, direct-shopping features, and click-outs also exert a positive impact. We also found that community members stay more briefly on the SSC than ordinary users. This implies that community members could benefit from learning effects. If a visit occurs on the weekend, the duration is greater than during the week. Both the academic and managerial implications are considered.

References

  1. Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A., and Wood, S. 1997. Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing 61, 3 (1997), 38--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andrews, D., Preece, J., and Turoff, M. 2002. A conceptual framework for demographic groups resistant to on-line community interaction. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6, 3 (2002), 9--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bakos, Y. J. 1996. Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science 43, 12 (1996), 1676--1692. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bucklin, R. E., Lattin, J. M., Ansari, A., Gupta, S., Bell, D., Coupey, E., Little, J. D. C., Mela, C., Montgomery, A., and Steckel, J. 2002. Choice and the Internet: From clickstream to research stream. Marketing Letters 13, 3 (2002), 245--258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bucklin, R. E. and Sismeiro, C. 2009. Click here for Internet insight: Advances in clickstream data analysis in marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23, 1 (2009), 35--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bucklin, R. E. and Sismeiro, C. 2003. A model of Web site browsing behavior estimated on clickstream data. Journal of Marketing Research 40, 3 (2003), 249--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cattuto, C., Loreto, V., and Pietronero, L. 2007. Semiotic dynamics and collaborative tagging. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 104, 5 (2007), 1461--1464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chatterjee, P., Hoffmann, D. L., and Novak, T. P. 2003. Modeling the clickstream: Implications for Web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Science 22, 4 (2003), 520--541. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Chen, Y. and Xie, J. 2008. Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science 54, 3 (2008), 477--491. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chen, Y. C., Shang, R. A., and Kao, C. Y. 2009. The effects of information overload on consumers' subjective state towards buying decision in the Internet shopping environment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 8, 1 (2009), 48--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cheung, M. K., Lee, K. O., and Rabjohn, N. 2008. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth. Internet Research 18, 3 (2008), 229--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Chevalier, J. A. and Mayzlin, D. 2006. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 43, 3 (2006), 345--354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Cooley, R., Mobasher, B., and Srivastava, J. 1999. Data preparation for mining World Wide Web browsing patterns. Knowledge and Information Systems 1, 1 (1999), 5--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Danaher, P. J. 2007: Modeling Page Views Across Multiple Websites with an Application to Internet Reach and Frequency Prediction. Marketing Science 26, 3 (2007), 422--437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Danaher, P. J./Mullarkey, G. 2003: Factors Affecting Online Advertising Recall: A Study of Students. Journal of Advertising Research 43, 3 (2003), 252--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Danaher, P. J., Mullarkey, G., and Essegaier, S. 2006. Factors affecting Web site visit duration: A cross-domain analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 43, 2 (2006), 182--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X., and Awad, N. F. 2007. Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales. The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing 21, 4 (2007), 23--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Dhar, V., and Chang, E. A. 2007. Does chatter matter? The impact of user-generated content on music sales. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23, 4 (2007), 300--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Engel, J. F. and Blackwell, R. D. 1982. Consumer Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Flavian, C. and Guinaliu, M. 2005. The influence of virtual communities on distribution strategies in the Internet. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 33, 6 (2005), 405--425.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Godes, D. B. and Mayzlin, D. 2004. Using online conversation to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science 23, 4 (2004), 545--560. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Golder, S. and Huberman, B. 2006. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32, 2 (2006), 198--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hansen, T. and Jensen, J. M. 2009. Shopping orientation and online clothing purchases: The role of gender and purchase intention. European Journal of Marketing 43, 9/10 (2009), 1154--1170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hoffman, D. L. and Novak, T. P. 1996. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing 60, 3 (1996), 50--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., and Neumann, M. M. 2006. The influence of avatars on online consumer shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing 70, 4 (2006), 19--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., and Mitra, S. 2009. Searching for experience on the Web: An empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. Journal of Marketing 73, 2 (2009), 55--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Janiszewski, C. 1998. The influence of display characteristics on visual exploratory search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 25, 3 (1998), 290--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jayawardhena, C. and Wright, L. 2009. An empirical investigation into e-shopping excitement: Antecedents and effects. European Journal of Marketing 43, 9 (2009), 1171--1187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., and Lohse, G. L. 2003. Cognitive lock-in and the power law of practice. Journal of Marketing 67, 2 (2003), 62--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Johnson, E. J., Moe, W. W., Fader, P. S., Bellman, S., and Lohse, G. L. 2004. On the depth and dynamics of online search behavior. Management Science 50, 3 (2004), 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kozinets, R. V. 1999. E-tribalised marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal 17, 3 (1999), 252--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Laudon, K. C. and Traver, C. G. 2009. E-Commerce: Business. Technology. Society. 5th International ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Liang, T. P., Chen, H. Y., and Turban, E. 2009. Effect of personalization on the perceived usefulness of online customer services: A dual-core theory. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference Electronic Commerce (ICEC '09). New York, ACM, August 2009, 279--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mandel, N. and Johnson, E. J. 2002. When Web pages influence choice: Effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research 29, 2 (2002), 235--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Moe, W. W. 2006. An empirical two-stage choice model with varying decision rules applied to Internet clickstream data. Journal of Marketing Research 43, 4 (2006), 680--692.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Moe, W. W. 2003. Buying, searching, or browsing: Differentiating between online shoppers using in-store navigational clickstream. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13, 1&2 (2003), 29--40Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Moe, W. W. and Fader, P. S. 2004 a). Capturing evolving visit behavior in clickstream data. Journal of Interactive Marketing 18, 1 (2004), 5--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Moe, W. W. and Fader, P. S. 2004 b). Dynamic conversion behavior at e-commerce sites. Management Science 50, 3 (2004), 326--335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Monroe, S., Sinclair, D., and Wachinger, T. A. 2009. Understanding online shoppers in Europe. The McKinsey Quarterly, May 2009 (available at http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Understanding_online_shoppers_in_Europe_2353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Montgomery, A. L., Li, S., Srinivasan, K., and Liechty, J. C. 2004. Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Marketing Science 23, 4 (2004), 579--595. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Nielsen Media Research 2009. Online Engagement Deepens as Social Media and Video Sites Reshape the Internet. Available at http://enus.nielsen.com/etc/medialib/nielsen_dotcom/en_us/documents/pdf/press_releases/2009/april.Par.94188.File.pdf, accessed on January 17, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Nikolaeva, R. and Sriram, S. 2006. The moderating role of consumer and product characteristics on the value of customized on-line recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 11, 2 (2006--7), 101--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Olbrich, R. and Holsing, C. 2011. Modeling Consumer Purchasing Behavior in Social Shopping Communities with Clickstream Data. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 16, 2 (2011--12), 15--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. O'Reilly, T. and Battelle, J. 2009. Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On. Web 2.0 Summit, O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2009 (available at http://assets.en.oreilly.com/1/event/28/web2009_websquared-whitepaper.pdf).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Padmanabhan, B., Zheng, Z., and Kimbrough, S. O. 2001. Personalization from incomplete data: What you don't know can hurt. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, ACM Press, 2001, 154--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Park, D., Lee, J., and Han, I. 2007. The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 11, 4 (2007), 125--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Park, J. and Chung, H. 2009. Consumers' travel website transferring behaviour: Analysis using clickstream data-time, frequency, and spending. The Service Industries Journal 29, 10 (2009), 1451--1463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Park, Y. H. and Fader, P. S. 2004. Modeling browsing behavior at multiple Web sites. Marketing Science 23, 2 (2004), 280--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Parsons, A. G. 2002. Non-functional motives for online shoppers: Why we click. Journal of Consumer Marketing 19, 5 (2002), 380--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Peters, K., Albers, S., Asselmann, D., and Schäfers, B. 2009. eCommerce revisited: The impact of an uncoupled consumer buying process on retailing. Marketing -- Journal of Research and Management 5, 2 (2009), 85--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Polyvore 2010 a). Overview. Available at http://www.polyvore.com/cgi/about, accessed on August 17, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Polyvore 2010 b). Contests: Sports Are Delicious. Available at http://www.polyvore.com/sports_are_delicious/contest.show?id=87455, accessed on August 21, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Rindfleisch, A. and Heide, J. B. 1997. Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. Journal of Marketing 61, 4 (1997), 30--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Rothaermel, F. T. and Sugiyama, S. 2001. Virtual Internet communities and commercial success: Individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of Time Zone.com. Journal of Management 27, 3 (2001), 297--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Senecal, S., Kalczynski, P. J., and Nantel, J. 2005. Consumers' decision-making process and their online shopping behavior: A clickstream analysis. Journal of Business Research 58, 11 (2005), 1599--1608.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Sismeiro, C. and Bucklin, R. E. 2004. Modeling purchase behavior at an e-commerce website: A conditional probability approach. Journal of Marketing Research 41, 3 (2004), 306--323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Smith, M. D. and Brynjolfsson, E. 2001. Consumer decision-making at an Internet shopbot: Brand still matters. Journal of Industrial Economics 49, 4 (2001), 541--558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Stephen, A. T. and Toubia, O. 2010. Deriving value from social commerce networks. Journal of Marketing Research 42, 2 (2010), 215--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Su, B. C. 2008. Characteristics of consumer search on-line: How much do we search? International Journal of Electronic Commerce 13, 1 (2008), 109--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Su, B. C. 2007. Consumer E-Tailer Strategies at on-line shopping comparison sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 11, 3 (2007), 135--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Tedeschi, B. 2006. Like Shopping? Social Networking? Try Social Shopping. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/11/technology/11ecom.html?fta=y, accessed on August 15, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Trusov, M., Bucklin, R., and Pauwels, K. 2009. Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing 73, 5 (2009), 90--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Turban, E., King, D., and Lang, J. 2011. Introduction to Electronic Commerce. 3rd International ed., Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Van den Poel, D. and Buckinx, W. 2005. Predicting online-purchasing behavior. European Journal of Operational Research 166, 2 (2005), 557--575.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Villanueva, J., Yoo, S., and Hanssens, D. M. 2008. The impact of marketing-induced versus word-of-mouth customer acquisition on customer equity growth. Journal of Marketing Research 45, 1 (2008), 48--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Wang, K., Wang, E. T. G., and Farn, C. K 2009. Influence of Web advertising strategies, consumer goal-directedness, and consumer involvement on Web advertising effectiveness. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 13, 4 (2009), 67--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Effect of user-generated content on website stickiness: the case of social shopping communities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEC '12: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce
      August 2012
      357 pages
      ISBN:9781450311977
      DOI:10.1145/2346536

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate150of244submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader