skip to main content
10.1145/2346676.2346683acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A generic approach to generate opinion lists of phrases for opinion mining applications

Published:12 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present an approach to generate lists of opinion bearing phrases with their opinion values in a continuous range between -- 1 and 1. Opinion phrases that are considered include single adjectives as well as adjective-based phrases with an arbitrary number of words. The opinion values are derived from user review titles and star ratings, as both can be regarded as summaries of the user's opinion about the product under review. Phrases are organized in trees with the opinion bearing adjective as tree root. For trees with missing branches, opinion values then can be calculated using trees with similar branches but different roots. An example list is produced and compared to existing opinion lists.

References

  1. H. Amiri and T.-S. Chua. Mining Slang and Urban Opinion Words and Phrases from cQA Services: An Optimization Approach. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 193--202, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Baccianella, A. Esuli, and F. Sebastiani. SentiWordNet 3.0: An Enhanced Lexical Resource for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 2200--2204, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Brooke, M. Tofiloski, and M. Taboada. Cross-Linguistic Sentiment Analysis: From English to Spanish. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pages 50--54, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Carvalho, L. Sarmento, M. J. Silva, and E. d. Oliveira. Clues for Detecting Irony in User-Generated Contents: Oh...!! It's "so easy";-). In Proceedings of the 1st International CIKM Workshop on Topic-Sentiment Analysis for Mass Opinion Measurement, pages 53--56, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Choi and C. Cardie. Learning with Compositional Semantics as Structural Inference for Subsentential Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 793--801, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Clematide and M. Klenner. Evaluation and Extension of a Polarity Lexicon for German. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis, pages 7--13, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani. Determining Term Subjectivity and Term Orientation for Opinion Mining. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 193--200, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani. SentiWordNet: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion Mining. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 417--422, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. N. Hu, P. A. Pavlou, and J. Zhang. Why do Online Product Reviews have a J-shaped Distribution? Overcoming Biases in Online Word-of-Mouth Communication. Marketing Science, 198:7, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Hu, J. Zhang, and P. A. Pavlou. Overcoming the J-shaped Distribution of Product Reviews. Communications of the ACM, 52:144--147, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. Jindal and B. Liu. Review Spam Detection. In Proceedings of the 16th International World Wide Web Conference, pages 1189--1190, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Jindal and B. Liu. Opinion Spam and Analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 219--230, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Jindal, B. Liu, and E.-P. Lim. Finding Unusual Review Patterns Using Unexpected Rules. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 1549--1552, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Klenner, S. Petrakis, and A. Fahrni. Robust Compositional Polarity Classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pages 180--184, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E.-P. Lim, V.-A. Nguyen, N. Jindal, B. Liu, and H. W. Lauw. Detecting Product Review Spammers using Rating Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 939--948, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. Liu, M. Hu, and J. Cheng. Opinion Observer: Analyzing and Comparing Opinions on the Web. In Proceedings of the 14th International World Wide Web Conference, pages 342--351, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. B. Liu and L. Zhang. A Survey of Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. In C. C. Aggarwal and C. Zhai, editors, Mining Text Data, pages 415--463. Springer US, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. Liu and S. Seneff. Review Sentiment Scoring via a Parse-and-Paraphrase Paradigm. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 161--169, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Marcus, G. Kim, A. Marcinkiewicz, R. MacIntyre, A. Bies, M. Ferguson, K. Katz, and B. Schasberger. The Penn Treebank: Annotating Predicate Argument Structure. In Proceedings of the ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop, pages 114--119, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. G. A. Miller. WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38:39--41, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. K. Moilanen and S. Pulman. Sentiment Composition. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. M. Mudambi and D. Schuff. What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34:185--200, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. A. Mukherjee, B. Liu, and N. Glance. Spotting Fake Reviewer Groups in Consumer Reviews. In Proceedings of the 21st International World Wide Web Conference, pages 191--200, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J.-C. Na, T. T. Thet, C. S. G. Khoo, and W. Y. M. Kyaing. Visual Sentiment Summarization of Movie Reviews. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Asia-pacific Digital Libraries, pages 277--287, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. Oelke, M. Hao, C. Rohrdantz, D. A. Keim, U. Dayal, L.-E. Haug, and H. Janetzko. Visual Opinion Analysis of Customer Feedback Data. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, pages 187--194, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up?: Sentiment Classification using Machine Learning Techniques. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empitical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 79--86, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. A.-M. Popescu and O. Etzioni. Extracting Product Features and Opinions from Reviews. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, pages 339--346, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. R. Remus, U. Quasthoff, and G. Heyer. SentiWS -- a Publicly Available German-language Resource for Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Ressources and Evaluation, pages 1168--1171, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. E. Riloff and J. Wiebe. Learning Extraction Patterns for Subjective Expressions. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 105--112, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. H. Takamura, T. Inui, and M. Okumura. Extracting Semantic Orientations of Words using Spin Model. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 133--140, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. H. Tang, S. Tan, and X. Cheng. A survey on sentiment detection of reviews. Expert Systems with Applications, 36:10760--10773, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. P. D. Turney. Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 417--424, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. L. Velikovich, S. Blair-Goldensohn, K. Hannan, and R. McDonald. The viability of web-derived polarity lexicons. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 777--785, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. U. Waltinger. GermanPolarityClues: A Lexical Resource for German Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 1638--1642, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, pages 347--354, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. K. Zhang, Y. Cheng, Y. Xie, D. Honbo, A. Agrawal, D. Palsetia, K. Lee, W.-k. Liao, and A. Choudhary. SES: Sentiment Elicitation System for Social Media Data. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 129--136, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. L. Zhang and B. Liu. Identifying Noun Product Features that Imply Opinions. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, volume 2, pages 575--580, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A generic approach to generate opinion lists of phrases for opinion mining applications

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WISDOM '12: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining
          August 2012
          85 pages
          ISBN:9781450315432
          DOI:10.1145/2346676

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 August 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate10of17submissions,59%

          Upcoming Conference

          KDD '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader