ABSTRACT
In recent days, companies find it extremely difficult to predict consumers' needs and requirements (Pickton and Broderick, 2005). While mass marketing arguably belongs to the past, it is now a less viable strategy to satisfy consumers by a single offer (Smith, 1956). Thus, the adoption of innovative and cross - disciplinary techniques might be a key factor in order to understand consumers and define their needs and requirements towards the design of new products. Affective engineering is a field of product design that deals with the translation of consumers' feelings for a product into design elements (Jordan 2000; Henson et al. 2006). Kansei engineering is an affective engineering methodology, in which tools and techniques from a wide variety of fields, such as psychology, ergonomics, information systems, sociology and marketing, are implemented, in order to link consumers' feelings and emotions with product properties and translate them into design elements (Nagamachi 1995; Schutte et al. 2004). The aim of this paper is to explore the kansei engineering field, from a consumer culture research perspective. Consumer Culture Theory 'refers to a family of theoretical perspectives that address the dynamic relationships between consumer actions, the marketplace, and cultural meanings' (Arnould and Thompson, 2005: p. 868). In order to achieve this, an introduction of a variety of qualitative tools and techniques currently utilized in consumer culture theory is made and an attempt to incorporate many of these methods within the kansei engineering field is conducted through the proposition of a theoretical framework.
- Alcantara E., Artacho M., Gonzalez J. and Garcia A. 2005. Application of product semantics to footwear design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 3, 727--735.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arnold K. and Burkhard D. 2001. Kansei Engineering -From the Customers Point of View. Special Report LiTH-IKP-R-1226, IKP, Linkoping University.Google Scholar
- Arnould E. And Price L. 1993. River Magic: Extraordinary Experience and the Service Encounter. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 1, 24--46.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arnould E. and Thompson C. 2005. Consumer culture theory (CCT): twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 4, 868--882.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Belk R. 1989. Materialism and the Modern U. S. Christmas. In Interpretive Consumer Research, ed. Hirschman E. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 148--167.Google Scholar
- Belk R. (1990). Halloween: An Evolving American Consumption Ritual. Advances in Consumer Research, 17. In Goldberg M., Gorn G. and Pollay R., (eds.). Association for Consumer Research, Provo: Utah, 508--517.Google Scholar
- Belk R. and Costa A. 1998. The mountain man myth: a contemporary consuming fantasy. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 3, 218--240.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bergman B. and Klefsjo B. 1994. Quality: From customer needs to customer satisfaction. McGraw Hill: London.Google Scholar
- Celsi R., Rose R. and Leigh T. 1993. An exploration of high-risk leisure consumption through skydiving. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 1, 1--24.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cova B. 1997. Community and consumption: towards a definition of the linking value of products or services. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 3/4, 297--316.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cova B. and Cova V. 2001. Tribal aspects of postmodern consumption research: The case of French in line roller skaters. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 1, 1, 67--76.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cova B. and Cova V. 2002. Tribal marketing: the tribalisation of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 36, 5/6, 595--620.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cova B. and Pace S. 2006. Brand Community of Convenience Products: new forms of customer empowerment -- the case of "My Nutella The Community". European Journal of Marketing, 40, 9/10, 1087--1105.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Faraday Packaging Partnership 2004. Affective Design (Kansei Engineering) in Japan. A report from a DTI International Technology Service Mission: UK Department of Trade and Industry, p. 20--24.Google Scholar
- Denzin N. and Lincoln Y. 1984. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Dionisio P., Leal C. and Moutinho L. 2008. Fandom affiliation and tribal behaviour: a sports marketing application. Qualitative Market Research: An international Journal, 11, 1, 17--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Firat F. and Shultz J. 1997. From segmentation to fragmentation. European Journal of Marketing, 1, 31, 183--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Glaser B. and Strauss A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine: Chicago.Google Scholar
- Gill J. and Johnson P. 2002. Research Methods for Managers. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications: London.Google Scholar
- Gordon W. and Langmaid R. 1988. Qualitative Market Research. A Practitioner's and Buyers Guide. Gower Publishing Company Limited: England.Google Scholar
- Grismaeth K. 2007. Kansei engineering: linking emotions with product features. Department of Product Design, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, DOI= http://www.ivt.ntnu.no.Google Scholar
- Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R. and Black W. 1995. Multivariate data analysis with readings. Prentice-Hall International: New Jersey. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henson B., Barnes C., Livesey R., Childs T. and Ewart K. (2006). Affective consumer requirements: A case study of moisturizer Packaging. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 14, 6, 187--196.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hines T. and Quinn L. (2005). Socially Constructed Realities and the Hidden Face of Market Segmentation. Journal of Marketing Management, 21, 1, 529--544.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hirschman E. and LaBarbera P. 1989. The Meaning of Christmas, in Interpretive Consumer Research, (eds.) Hirschman E. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 136--147.Google Scholar
- Hirschman E. 1992. The Consciousness of Addiction: Toward a General Theory of Compulsive Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 2, 155--179.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Holt D. 1995. How Consumers Consumer: A Taxonomy of Baseball Spectator's Consumption Practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1, 1--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Horiguchi M. and Takamasa S. 1995. A Kansei engineering approach to a driver/vehicle system. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15, 25--37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ishihara S., Ishihara K, Nagamashi M. and Matsubara Y. 1997. An analysis of kansei structure on shoes using self - organizing neural networks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19, 93--104.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jindo T. and Hirasago K. 1997. Application studies to car interior of kansei engineering. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19, 105--114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jordan P. 2000. Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. Taylor & Francis: London, New York.Google Scholar
- Komazawa T. and Hayashi C. 1976. A statistical method for quantification of categorical data and its applications to medical science. In F. T. de Dombal and F. Gremy (eds), North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Kozinets R. 1997. I want to believe: A netnography of the X-Philes Subculture of Consumption. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 1, 470--475.Google Scholar
- Kozinets R. 2001. Utopian enterprise: articulating the meanings of star trek's culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 1, 67--88.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kozinets R. 2002. The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 1, 61--72.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kozinets R. 2010. Netnography - Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage Publications: London. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee S., Harada A. and Stappers J. 2002. Pleasure with products: Design based with kansei. In Pleasure with Products: Beyond usability (2002) Green W., Jordan P., Taylor and Francis: London, 219--229.Google Scholar
- Lincoln Y. and Guba E. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage Publications: CA Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
- Lindberg A. 2004. First impressions last. A Kansei engineering study on laminate flooring at Pergo. Department of Technology: Linköping University, DOI= http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:20030.Google Scholar
- Maffesoli M. 1993. La contemplation du monde: figures du style communautaire, Grasset: Paris.Google Scholar
- Maffesoli M. 1996. The Time of Tribes. Sage Publications: London.Google Scholar
- Malhotra N. and Birks D. 2007. Marketing Research: An Applied Approach. 3rd European Edition, FT Prentice Hall: Harlow.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moutinho L., Dionisio P. and Leal C. 2007. Surf Tribal Behaviour: A sports marketing application. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25, 7, 668--690.Google Scholar
- Muniz A. and O' Guinn, T. 2001. Brand Community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 412--423.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Muniz A. and Hope J. 2005. Religiosity in the abandoned Apple Newton brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 4, 737--747.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nagamachi M. 1995. Kansei engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15, 1, 3--11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nagamachi M. 1997. Requirement identification of consumer's needs in product design. IEA '97, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health: Tampere, Finland, 231--233.Google Scholar
- Nagamachi M. 2001. Workshop 2 on kansei engineering. Proceedings of the International conference on affective human factors design, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Nagamachi M. 2002. Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer oriented technology for product development. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 3, 289--294.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nakada K. 1997. Kansei engineering research on the design of construction machinery. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19, 3, 129--146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nagasawa S 2002. Kansei and Business. International Journal of Kansei Engineering, 3, 1, 2--12.Google Scholar
- Nishino T., Nagamachi M. and Ishihara S. 2001. Rough set analysis on Kansei evaluation of color. Proceedings of The International Conference on Affective Human Factors Design, Singapore: Asian Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Osgood C., Suci G. and Tannenbaum P. 1969. Measurement of meaning. In Osgood C. and Snider G. (eds), Semantic differential technique - a source book, Chicago: Aldine publishing company, 56--82.Google Scholar
- Patterson M. 1998. Direct marketing in postmodernity: neotribes and direct communications. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 16, 1, 68--74.Google Scholar
- Patton M. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Peñaloza L. 1998. Just doing it: a visual ethnographic study of spectacular consumption behavior at Nike town. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 2, 337--400.Google Scholar
- Schouten J. 1991. Selves in Transition: Symbolic Consumption in Personal Rites of Passage and Identity Reconstruction. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 4, 412--425.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schouten J. and McAlexander J. 1995. Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1, 43--61.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schutte S. and Eklund J. 2001. An approach to kansei engineering-methods - A case study on design identity. Conference on human affective design, Singapore, Asian Academic Press: London.Google Scholar
- Schutte S. 2002. Designing feelings into products: Integrating kansei engineering methodology in product development. Doctoral Thesis. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, No. 946.Google Scholar
- Schutte S. and Eklund J. 2003. Product design for heart and soul. Department for Human Systems Engineering, Linköpings Universitet Press: Sweden.Google Scholar
- Schutte S., Eklund J., Axelsson J. and Nagamachi M. 2004. Concepts, methods and tools in kansei engineering. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 5, 3, 214 -231.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schutte S. 2005. Engineering emotional values in product design - Kansei Engineering in development. Dissertation Thesis. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. No 951, 35--66.Google Scholar
- Sherry J. and McGrath M. 1989. Unpacking the holiday presence: A comparative ethnography of two gift stores. In Interpretive Consumer Research, ed. Hirschman E. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 148--167.Google Scholar
- Shimizu Y. and Jindo T. 1995. A fuzzy logic analysis method for evaluating human sensitivities. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15, 1, 39--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Skandalis A., Papantonopoulos S. and Koulouriotis D. 2008. Emotional and Semantic Product Design-Kansei Engineering: An Application in the design of milk cartons. 20th National Congress of the Hellenic Operational Research Society, Spetses, Greece.Google Scholar
- Smith W. 1956. Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21, 1, 3--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spiggle S. 1994. Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1, 491--503.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tedlock B. 1991. From Participant Observation to the Observation of Participation: The Emergence of Narrative Ethnography. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47, 1, 69--94.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thatcher A., James J. and Todd A. 2005. Visual design of a webpage. Proceedings of CybErg. - The Fourth International Cyberspace Conference on Ergonomics. International Ergonomics Association Press: Johannesburg.Google Scholar
- Thompson C., Locander W. and Pollio H. 1989. Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: the philosophy and method of existential- phenomenology". Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 2, 133--146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thompson C. and Haytko D. 1997. Speaking of Fashion: Consumers' Uses of Fashion Discourses and the Appropriation of Countervailing Cultural Meanings. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 1, 15--42.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thompson C. and Troester M. 2002. Consumer values systems in the age of postmodern fragmentation: the case of natural health microculture. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 4, 550--571.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Uusitalo L. 1998. Consumption in postmodernity: Social structuration and the construction of the self, the active consumer: novelty and surprise in consumer choice, Rutledge: London.Google Scholar
- Valtonen A., Markuksela V. and Moisander J. 2010. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 375--380.Google Scholar
- Wallendorf M. and Arnould E. 1991. We gather together: consumption rituals of Thanksgiving Day. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 1, 13--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Affective engineering: towards a consumer culture theory approach to kansei engineering
Recommendations
A Kansei Engineering Evaluation of the Emotional Appeal of Product Information on E-Commerce Product Pages
CHI Greece 2021: CHI Greece 2021: 1st International Conference of the ACM Greek SIGCHI ChapterThe study proposes a Kansei Engineering methodology for the evaluation of customer impressions formed by the product information presenting a food supplement on e-commerce product pages. The study examined the design elements currently used for ...
A Kansei mining system for affective design
Affective design has received much attention from both academia and industries. It aims at incorporating customers' affective needs into design elements that deliver customers' affective satisfaction. The main challenge for affective design originates ...
Kansei Engineering for E-Commerce Cantonese Porcelain Selection in China
Human-Computer Interaction. Perspectives on DesignAbstractIn online shopping experience of Cantonese Porcelain, customers are unable to touch, feel, take a close look at the details, and perceive the placement of the product. Therefore, the appearance of product is the most important factor to influence ...
Comments