ABSTRACT
Sustainable design can be perceived as a sort of activism, and as such the emphasis is on communicating certain messages with design. Designers can be seen as trained facilitators for societal discourse, as they are educated to negotiate between several stakeholders in a context-driven problem solving setting. They can also combine aesthetic and functional thinking. These skills should be used to question the over-consumptive consumer behavior.
This short position paper explores the ways, how design can be used to bring matters to a head in our society. It is looking into strategies, such as provocative critical design, as explorative design activity that seek to raise societal issues into public debate. It also suggests the posthuman factors to user-interface design, and proposes provocation as one the attribute for design to draw more attention to the contemporary challenges of sustainability.
- Bördner, C. and S. Lovell, 2010. Freak show: Strategies for (Dis)engagement in Design. Exhibition catalogue (Helmrinderknecht, Berlin, 12th Nov 2010 - 15th Jan 2011).Google Scholar
- Dunne, A. 2005. Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. The MIT Press, Cambridge, US. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Faste, H. 2010. Posthuman Factors: How Perceptual Robotic Art Will Save Humanity from Extinction. Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, IT.Google Scholar
- Fallman, D. 2008. The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies, and Design Exploration. Design Issues. #24(3) (2008), 4--18.Google Scholar
- Fuad-Luke, A. 2009. Design activism: beautiful strangeness for sustainable world. Earthscan, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Jensen, R., H., and T. U. Lenskjold, 2004. Designing for social friction: Exploring ubiquitous computing as means of cultural interventions in urban space. In Proceedings of Computers in Art and Design Education Conference (Malmö, Sweden, 29 June -- 1 July 2004).Google Scholar
- Nieminen, M. 2004. Lähtökohtia yliopistojen kolmannen tehtävän tarkastelulle. In K. Kankaala, E. Kaukonen, P. Kutinlahti, T. Lemola, M. Nieminen and J. Välimaa, Yliopistojen kolmas tehtävä? {The third role of universities?} Edita, Helsinki, FI.Google Scholar
- Resilience Alliance: Rockström, J. et al. 2009. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society. #14(2): 32 (2009).Google Scholar
- Shedroff, N. 2009. Design is the Problem: The Future of Design Must be Sustainable. Rosenfeld Media, New York, US.Google Scholar
- Saito, Y. 2007. Everyday Aesthetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Sherwin, C. 2004. Design and sustainability. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design. #4, no. 1 (Jan., 2004), 21--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sparke, P. 1990. 'A Home for Everybody?': Design, Ideology and the Culture of the Home in Italy, 1945--1972. In: P. Greenhalgh, ed. 1990. Modernism in design. Reaction Books Ltd., London, UK.Google Scholar
- Thorpe, A. 2008. Design as Activism. In Proceedings of Changing the Change (Torino, Italy, July 10-12 2008).Google Scholar
- Vezzoli, C. 2007. System Design for Sustainability. Maggioli Editore, Milano, IT.Google Scholar
- Vezzoli, C. 2003. A new generation of designers: perspectives for education and training in the field of sustainable design. Experiences and projects at the Politecnico di Milano University. Journal of Cleaner Production. #11 (2003), 1--9.Google Scholar
- Vu, T. 2011. Critical Design as Constructive Provocation. Mind Design. #36 (Feb. 2011).Google Scholar
- Wahl, D. C. and S. Baxter, 2008. The Designer's Role in Facilitating Sustainable Solutions. Design Issues. #24, no. 2 (April, 2008), 72--83.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Unpleasurable products and interfaces: provocative design communication for sustainable society
Recommendations
Who is to change?: nudging and provocative communication discussed through Løgstrup's ontological ethics
Special Issue on EthicompThis paper discusses nudging and provocative communication as possible approaches to designing behavioural change concerning minimisation of waste within the framework of Løgstrup's ontological ethics. Waste management companies are confronted with ...
HCI for the real world
CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHCI as a field comfortably and unquestionably links itself with the corporate world. What does this mean in terms of an ethics of problem choice, meaning the considerations that influence what types of design projects HCI researchers consider as ...
Psychological and Cognitive Challenges in Sustainable AI Design
Culture and ComputingAbstractTo design sustainable AI designers must be able to understand and think about complex technical, ecological, social, and economic systems and their interactions. Their reasoning and decisions need to be based on ethics and scientific facts. They ...
Comments