skip to main content
10.1145/2347504.2347557acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdppiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Authenticity in digital printing

Published:22 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

For those presently undertaking research and practice within the field of digitally printed textiles, inadequately defined boundaries can potentially lead to confusion and misunderstanding. This paper aims to clarify what is meant by the term digital print and locate authenticity within it, by drawing comparisons with photography in order to better explain some of the contextual issues that currently surround the digital printing of textiles.

The scope ranges from an initial idea formed as a digital file that is stored on a computer, to the act of depositing droplets of dye through the print heads of a digital printer as an image, which is subsequently steamed and fixed onto the fabric substrate. There are, however, many processes and techniques involved in digital printing, none of which are unique to the digital printing of textiles; each individual technique, according to Cambridge University's Andy Hopper, 'can also be used to manufacture high-value, high precision products such as flat-panel displays, printed electronics, and photovoltaic cells for power generators' (2010). Also, as author Sarah Braddock Clarke states, the computer is only a tool, so it is not the computer, but rather the artist or designer, who makes the 'aesthetic decisions' (2007: 178). Nonetheless, increasingly these technologies are providing complex, rewarding and aesthetically challenging opportunities for contemporary textile artists, designers and craftspersons.

References

  1. Benjamin, W. 1936. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, London: Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Braddock Clarke, S. E. and O'Mahony, M. 2007. Techno Textiles 2: Revolutionary Fabrics for Fashion and Design, London: Thames & Hudson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Collins. 1994. Collins English Dictionary, London: HarperCollins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience, New York: Perigee Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Flusser, V. 1983. Towards a Philosophy of Photography, London: Reaktion.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hopper, A. 2010. Cambridge Ideas Change the World. DOI= http://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1960. 'Eye and Mind', in Merleau-Ponty's Essays on Painting, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Russell, A. 2009. 'Alex Russell', in B. Quinn, Textile Designers: at the Cutting Edge, London: Laurence King.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    DPPI '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
    June 2011
    492 pages
    ISBN:9781450312806
    DOI:10.1145/2347504

    Copyright © 2011 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 June 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate27of53submissions,51%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader