skip to main content
10.1145/2362456.2362493acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi-knowConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

I-know my users: user-centric profiling based on the perceptual preference questionnaire (PPQ)

Published:05 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

A substantial proportion of user modeling research deals with detection, classification and use of as well as adaptation to the users' preferences. In this paper, we develop a questionnaire to assess aspects of perceptual preferences in regard to information processing, knowledge gain and learning, named Perceptual Preferences Questionnaire (PPQ). The PPQ is validated based on the results of an online survey with forum users (n=76). Given the perceptual preferences of a user, we explore first implications on how to present information to that specific user in order to ease understanding, which can be achieved by matching his/her perceptual preferences. Further research aims to combine the PPQ with implicit testing based on the users' textual utterances and the users' interests.

References

  1. Bortz, J, Döring, N.: Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. Springer, Berlin, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bühner, M.: Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Pearson, München, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., Ecclestone, K.: Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning. A systematic and critical review. LSRC, London, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunn, R.: Commentary: Teaching Students Through Their Perceptual Strengths or Preferences. In: Journal of Reading 31/4, pp. 304--309, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Felder, R., Silverman, L: Learning and Teaching Styles In Engineering Education. In: Engineering Education, 78/7, pp. 674--68, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldstein, E. B.: Sensation & Perception. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Heinath, M., Dzaack, J., Wiesner, A., Urbas, L.: Applications for Cognitive User Modeling. In: Conati, C., McCoy, K., Paliouras, G. (Eds.): UM 2007. LNCS, pp. 127--136. Springer, Berlin, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Horn, J. L.: A rationale test for the number of factors in factor analysis. In: Psychometrika, 30, pp. 179--185, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kellner, G., Berendt, B.: Towards a new dimension for user modeling: The use of sensory vocabulary. In: Advances in User Modeling. LNCS, Springer, Berlin, pp. 397--401, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kellner, G., Berendt, B.: Extracting Knowledge about Cognitive Style. In: F. Ren, Y. Zhong (Eds.): NLP-KE 2011. IEEE press; P. 73--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Laming, D.: The Measurement of Sensation. Oxford University Press, New York, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Reid, J. M.: The Learning Style Preferences of ESL Students. In: TESOL Quarterly, 21/1, pp. 87--111, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Robotham, D. (1999, 10.09.2011): The application of learning style theory in higher education teaching, available: http://serprofessoruniversitario.pro.br/m%C3%B3dulos/c%C3%A9rebro-e-aprendizagem/application-learning-style-theory-higher-education-teaching-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sadler-Smith, E., Riding, R.: Cognitive style and instructional preferences. In: Instructional Science 27, pp. 355--371, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Shute, V., Towle, B.: Adaptive E-Learning. In: Educational Psychologist 38/2, pp. 105--114, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsianos, N. et al.: User-Centric Profiling on the Basis of Cognitive and Emotional Characteristics: An Empirical Study. In: Nejdl, W. et al. (Eds.): AH08, LNCS 5149, pp. 214--223. Springer, Berlin, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Zwick, W. R., Velicer, W. F.: Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. In: Psychological Bulletin 99, pp. 432--442, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. I-know my users: user-centric profiling based on the perceptual preference questionnaire (PPQ)

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      i-KNOW '12: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies
      September 2012
      244 pages
      ISBN:9781450312424
      DOI:10.1145/2362456

      Copyright © 2012 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 September 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate77of238submissions,32%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader