skip to main content
research-article

Calibrated image appearance reproduction

Published:01 November 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Managing the appearance of images across different display environments is a difficult problem, exacerbated by the proliferation of high dynamic range imaging technologies. Tone reproduction is often limited to luminance adjustment and is rarely calibrated against psychophysical data, while color appearance modeling addresses color reproduction in a calibrated manner, albeit over a limited luminance range. Only a few image appearance models bridge the gap, borrowing ideas from both areas. Our take on scene reproduction reduces computational complexity with respect to the state-of-the-art, and adds a spatially varying model of lightness perception. The predictive capabilities of the model are validated against all psychophysical data known to us, and visual comparisons show accurate and robust reproduction for challenging high dynamic range scenes.

References

  1. Adams, A. 1983. The print. The Ansel Adams Photography series. Little, Brown and Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Allred, S. R., Radonjić, A., Gilchrist, A. L., and Brainard, D. H. 2012. Lightness perception in high dynamic range images: Local and remote luminance effects. Journal of Vision 12, 2, 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Aydin, T., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H. 2008. Dynamic range independent image quality assessment. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 69(1)--69(10). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chiu, K., Herf, M., Shirley, P., Swamy, S., Wang, C., and Zimmerman, K. 1993. Spatially nonuniform scaling functions for high contrast images. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface '93, 245--253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Debevec, P. 2005. A median cut algorithm for light probe sampling. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Posters, ACM, New York, NY, USA, SIGGRAPH '05. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Drago, F., Myszkowski, K., Annen, T., and Chiba, N. 2003. Adaptive logarithmic mapping for displaying high contrast scenes. Computer Graphics Forum 22, 3, 419--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Durand, F., and Dorsey, J. 2002. Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images. ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fairchild, M. D., and Johnson, G. M. 2002. Meet iCAM: an image color appearance model. In IS&T/SID 10th Color Imaging Conference, 33--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fairchild, M. D. 2005. Color appearance models, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fairchild, M. 2007. The HDR photographic survey. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Color Imaging Conference: Color Science and Engineering Systems, Technologies, and Applications, vol. 15, 233--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fattal, R., Lischinski, D., and Werman, M. 2002. Gradient domain high dynamic range compression. ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 249--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ferwerda, J. A., Pattanaik, S., Shirley, P., and Greenberg, D. P. 1996. A model of visual adaptation for realistic image synthesis. In SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, 249--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fishman, G. A., and Sokol, S. 1990. Electrophysiological Testing in Disorders of the Retina, Optic Nerve, and Visual Pathway. American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilchrist, A., and Radonjić, A. 2010. Frameworks of illumination revealed by probe disk technique. Journal of Vision 10, 5, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gilchrist, A., Kossyfidis, C., Bonato, F., Agostini, T., Cataliotti, J., Li, X., Spehar, B., Annan, V., and Economou, E. 1999. An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychol Rev. 106, 4 (Oct), 795--834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hood, D. C., Ilves, T., Maurer, E., Wandell, B., and Buckingham, E. 1978. Human cone saturation as a function of ambient intensity: A test of models of shifts in the dynamic range. Vision Research 18, 8, 983--993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hunt, R. W. G. 1996. The reproduction of color. Fountain Press, England. Fifth edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, M. H., Weyrich, T., and Kautz, J. 2009. Modeling human color perception under extended luminance levels. ACM Transactions on Graphics 28, 3, 27:1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kiser, C., Reinhard, E., Tocci, M., and Tocci, N. 2012. Real-Time automated tone mapping system for HDR video. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Krawczyk, G., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H. 2004. Lightness perception inspired tone mapping. In First ACM Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV), 172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kuang, J., Johnson, G. M., and Fairchild, M. D. 2007. icam06: A refined image appearance model for hdr image rendering. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 18, 5, 406--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kunkel, T., and Reinhard, E. 2009. A neurophysiology-inspired steady-state color appearance model. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 26, 776--782.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lasansky, A. 1981. Synaptic action mediating cone responses to annular illumination in the retina of the larval tiger salamander. Journal of Physiology 310, 205--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Li, C., Luo, M. R., Rigg, B., and Hunt, R. W. G. 2002. CMC 2000 chromatic adaptation transform: CMCCAT2000. Color Research and Application 27, 1, 49--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Li, Y., Sharan, L., and Adelson, E. 2005. Compressing and companding high dynamic range images with subband architectures. ACM Transactions on Graphics 24, 3, 836--844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Luo, M. R., Clark, A., Rhodes, P., Schappo, A., Scrivner, S., and Tait, C. 1991. Quantifying colour appearance: Part I. LUTCHI colour appearance data. Colour Research and Application 16, 166--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mantiuk, R., Daly, S., and Kerofsky, L. 2008. Display adaptive tone mapping. ACM Trans. on Graphics 27, 3, 68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mantiuk, R., Mantiuk, R., Tomaszewska, A., and Heidrich, W. 2009. Color correction for tone mapping. Computer Graphics Forum 28, 2, pp. 193--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. McCann, J. J., and Rizzi, A. 2012. The Art and Science of HDR Imaging. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Moon, P., and Spencer, D. E. 1944. Visual data applied to lighting design. Journal of the Optical Society of America 34, 10, 605--617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Moroney, N., Fairchild, M. D., Hunt, R. W. G., Li, C. J., Luo, M. R., and Newman, T. 2002. The CIECAM02 color appearance model. In 10th Color Imaging Conference, 23--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Morovič, J. 2008. Color Gamut Mapping. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Myszkowski, K., Mantiuk, R., and Krawczyk, G. 2008. High Dynamic Range Video. Morgan and Claypool Publishers, San Rafael. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Pattanaik, S. N., Ferwerda, J. A., Fairchild, M. D., and Greenberg, D. P. 1998. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display. In SIGGRAPH 98 Conference Proceedings, 287--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Radonjić, A., Allred, S. R., Gilchrist, A. L., and Brainard, D. H. 2011. The dynamic range of human lightness perception. Current Biology 21, 1391--1936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Reinhard, E., and Devlin, K. 2005. Dynamic range reduction inspired by photoreceptor physiology. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11, 1, 13--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Reinhard, E., Stark, M., Shirley, P., and Ferwerda, J. 2002. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 267--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Reinhard, E., Kunkel, T., Marion, Y., Brouillat, J., Cozot, R., and Bouatouch, K. 2007. Image display algorithms for high and low dynamic range display devices. Journal of the Society for Information Display 15, 12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Reinhard, E., Khan, E. A., Akyüz, A. O., and Johnson, G. M. 2008. Color Imaging: Fundamentals and Applications. A K Peters, Wellesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Reinhard, E., Ward, G., Pattanaik, S., Debevec, P., Heidrich, W., and Myszkowski, K. 2010. High dynamic range imaging: Acquisition, display and image-based lighting, 2nd edition ed. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlick, C. 1994. Quantization techniques for the visualization of high dynamic range pictures. In Photorealistic Rendering Techniques, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, P. Shirley, G. Sakas, and S. Müller, Eds., 7--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Seetzen, H., Heidrich, W., Stuerzlinger, W., Ward, G., Whitehead, L., Trentacoste, M., Ghosh, A., and Vorozcovs, A. 2004. High dynamic range display systems. ACM Trans. on Graphics 23, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Stidwill, D., and Fletcher, R. 2011. Normal Binocular Vision: Theory, Investigation and Practical Aspects. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Tocci, M. D., Kiser, C., Tocci, N., and Sen, P. 2011. A Versatile HDR Video Production System. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2011) 30, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Tumblin, J., and Rushmeier, H. 1993. Tone reproduction for computer generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 13, 6, 42--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. van Hateren, J. H. 2006. Encoding of high dynamic range video with a model of human cones. ACM Transactions on Graphics 25, 4, 1380--1399. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Ward, G., Rushmeier, H., and Piatko, C. 1997. A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 3, 4, 291--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Calibrated image appearance reproduction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
        ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 31, Issue 6
        November 2012
        794 pages
        ISSN:0730-0301
        EISSN:1557-7368
        DOI:10.1145/2366145
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 November 2012
        Published in tog Volume 31, Issue 6

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader