skip to main content
10.1145/2372251.2372301acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How can open source software development help requirements management gain the potential of open innovation: an exploratory study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

A key component in successfully managing software products is to properly, and in a timely manner, identify and secure competitive advantage by innovation via feature differentiation. Although open source software (OSS) is not a new idea, several product development companies that operate in a market-driven context have started to use open source solutions as core software components in their products. Adopting open source core components implies a lower degree of control over software development and increased business risk associated with integrating differentiating contributions into the core release stream. Whether and how to adjust the current requirements management practices after the adoption of OSS components to fully benefit from the concept of open innovation has not yet been empirically explored. We outline experiences and challenges related to leveraging open innovation via engaging in OSS identified during 19 interviews with practitioners occupying different roles in the requirements management process at a large company followed by four validation interviews with other practitioners. We then propose a research agenda for requirements and decision management in the open innovation context and suggest which challenges in requirements engineering open innovation affects.

References

  1. Aurum, A., Wohlin C. 2007. A Value-Based Approach in Requirements Engineering: Explaining Some of the Fundamental Concepts. In Proceedings of the REFSQ 2007 Conference (Montpellier, France, June 20-23, 2007). 109--115. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) 109--115. DOI = 10.1007/978-3-540-73031-6_8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Herbsleb, J. D. 2007. Global Software Engineering: The Future of Socio-technical Coordination. In: Proccedings of the FOSE'07 Future of Software Engineering (Minneapolis, MN, United states, May 23, 2007 - May 25, 2007). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 188--198. DOI = 10.1109/FOSE.2007.11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Biffl, S., Aurum, A., Boehm, B., Erdogmus, H., Grunbacher, P. (eds.). 2005. Value-Based Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, ISBN 3-540-25993-7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sommerville, I., Sawyer P. 1997. Requirements Engineering: A Good Practice Guide. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation The new Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., Chesbrough, H. 2008. Understanding the Advantages of Open Innovation Practices in Corporate Venturing in Terms of Real Options. Creativity and Innovation Management. 251 (Mar. 2008), 251--258. DOI: 10.1109/IEEM.2008.4738011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lichtenthaler, U. 2008. Open Innovation in Practice: An Anlaysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions. Trans on Eng Management 55 (May 2008), 148--156. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2007.912932.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kauppinen, M., Savolainen, J., Mannisto, T. 2007. Requirements Engineering as a Driver for Innovations. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (New Delhi, India, 15-19 October 2007). IEEE Press, New York, 15--20. DOI: doi: 10.1109/RE.2007.47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Grube, P., Schmid, K. 2008. Selecting Creativity Techniques for Innovative Requirements Engineering. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Multimedia and Enjoyable Requirements Engineering - Beyond Mere Descriptions and with More Fun and Games MERE '08 (Barcelona, Spain 3 September), IEEE Press New York, 32--36. DOI: 10.1109/MERE.2008.6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Myers, M. D., Avison D. 2002. Qualitative Research in Information Systems. Sage Publications, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Pohl, C., Böckle, G., Linden, F. J. van der. 2005. Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer-Verlag, New York USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M.Q. Patton. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Agile manifesto http://agilemanifesto.org/, accessed January 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Karlsson, J., Ryan, K. 1997. A cost-value approach for prioritizing requirements. IEEE Softw. 14 (Sept. 1997), 67--74. DOI: 10.1109/52.605933. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Regnell, B., Brinkkemper, S. 2005. Market-Driven Requirements Engineering for Software Products. In: Aurum, A., Wohlin, C. (Eds.), Managing and Engineering Software Requirements, 287--308. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chesbrough, H., Adrienne Kardon C. 2006. Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management. 36 (June 2006), 229--236. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hood, C., Wiedemann., S., Fichtinger, S., Pautz, U. 2008. Requirements Management: The Interface Between Requirements Development and All Other Systems Engineering Processes. Springer, Berlin. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Svahnberg, M., Gorschek, T., Feldt, R., Torkar, R., Bin Saleem, S., Usman M. 2010. A systematic review on strategic release planning models. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52 (Mar 2010), 237--248. DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Laurent, P., Cleland-Huang, J. 2009. Lessons learned from open source projects for facilitating online requirements processes. In Proceedings of the 15th International Working Conference Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (Essen, Germany, 25 - 28 march 2009). Springer Verlag, Berling, 240--55. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02050-6_21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Glynn, E., Fitzgerald, B., Exton C. 2005. Commercial adoption of open source software: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, (17-18 November, Noosa Heads, Australia , 2005), IEEE Press, New York , 225--234. DOI: 10.1109/ISESE.2005.1541831.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Maxwell, J. A. 1992. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(Fall 1992), 279--300.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How can open source software development help requirements management gain the potential of open innovation: an exploratory study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ESEM '12: Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement
      September 2012
      338 pages
      ISBN:9781450310567
      DOI:10.1145/2372251

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 September 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate130of594submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader