skip to main content
10.1145/2396761.2396848acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring personal impact for group recommendation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Group activities are essential ingredients of people's social life. The rapid growth of online social networking services has greatly boosted group activities by providing convenient platform for users to organize and participate in such activities. Therefore, recommender systems, as a critical component in social networking services, now face new challenges in supporting group activities. In this paper, we study the group recommendation problem, i.e., making recommendations to a group of people in social networking services. We analyze the decision making process in a group to propose a personal impact topic (PIT) model for group recommendations. The PIT model effectively identifies the group preference profile for a given group by considering the personal preferences and personal impacts of group members. Moreover, we further enhance the discovery of personal impact with social network information to obtain an extended personal impact topic (E-PIT) model. We have conducted comprehensive data analysis and evaluations on three real datasets. The results show that our proposed group recommendation techniques outperform baseline approaches.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius, G. Adomavicius, and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE TKDE, 17(6):734--749, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Amer-Yahia, S. B. Roy, A. Chawlat, G. Das, and C. Yu. Group recommendation: semantics and effciency. PVLDB, 2:754--765, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Ardissono, A. Goy, G. Petrone, M. Segnan, and P. Torasso. Intrigue: personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and hand held devices. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 17(8):687--714, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. Baltrunas, T. Makcinskas, and F. Ricci. Group recommendations with rank aggregation and collaborative filtering. In RecSys, pages 119--126, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:993--1022, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In UAI, pages 43--52, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. M. Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In UAI, pages 43--52, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Crossen, J. Budzik, and K. J. Hammond. Flytrap: intelligent group music recommendation. In IUI, pages 184--185, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. M. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. CACM, 35:61--70, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Hofmann. Latent semantic models for collaborative filtering. TOIS, 22(1):89--115, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Jameson and B. Smyth. The adaptive web. chapter Recommendation to groups, pages 596--627. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. X. Liu, Q. He, Y. Tian, W.-C. Lee, J. McPherson, and J. Han. Event-based social networks: Linking the online and offine social worlds. In KDD, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Masthoff. Group modeling: Selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. UMUAI, 14:37--85, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. F. McCarthy and T. D. Anagnost. Musicfx: an arbiter of group preferences for computer supported collaborative workouts. In CSCW, pages 363--372, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. McCarthy, M. Salamo, L. Coyle, L. McGinty, B. Smyth, and P. Nixon. Cats: A synchronous approach to collaborative group recommendation. In FLAIRS, pages 86--91, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R. J. Mooney and L. Roy. Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In DL, pages 195--204, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. O'Connor, D. Cosley, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Polylens: a recommender system for groups of users. In ECSCW, pages 199--218, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Pizzutilo, B. De Carolis, G. Cozzolongo, and F. Ambruoso. Group modeling in a public space: methods, techniques, experiences. In WSEAS, pages 175--180, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl. Grouplens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In CSCW, pages 175--186, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Rosen-Zvi, T. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, and P. Smyth. The author-topic model for authors and documents. In UAI, pages 487--494, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In WWW, pages 285--295, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. X. Su and T. M. Khoshgoftaar. A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Advance in Artificial Intelligence, pages 4:2--4:2, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. L. Ungar, L. Ungar, D. Foster, E. Andre, S. Wars, F. S. Wars, D. S. Wars, and J. H. Whispers. Clustering methods for collaborative filtering. In AAAI Workshop on Recommendation Systems, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Ye, X. Liu, and W.-C. Lee. Exploring social influence for recommendation - a generative model approach. In SIGIR, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Z. Yu, X. Zhou, Y. Hao, and J. Gu. Tv program recommendation for multiple viewers based on user profile merging. UMUAI, 16:63--82, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring personal impact for group recommendation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '12: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
          October 2012
          2840 pages
          ISBN:9781450311564
          DOI:10.1145/2396761

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 October 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader