skip to main content
10.1145/2396761.2398621acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Maximizing revenue from strategic recommendations under decaying trust

Published:29 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Suppose your sole interest in recommending a product to me is to maximize the amount paid to you by the seller for a sequence of recommendations. How should you recommend optimally if I become more inclined to ignore you with each irrelevant recommendation you make? Finding an answer to this question is a key challenge in all forms of marketing that rely on and explore social ties; ranging from personal recommendations to viral marketing.

We prove that even if the recommendee regains her initial trust on each successful recommendation, the expected revenue the recommender can make over an infinite period due to payments by the seller is bounded. This can only be overcome when the recommendee also incrementally regains trust during periods without any recommendation. Here, we see a connection to "banner blindness," suggesting that showing fewer ads can lead to a higher long-term revenue.

References

  1. Z. Abrams, O. Mendelevitch, and J. Tomlin. Optimal delivery of sponsored search advertisements subject to budget constraints. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '07), pages 272--278, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. E. Andrews, R. Askey, and R. Roy. Special functions. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Arthur, M. Motwani, A. Sharma, and Y. Xu. Pricing strategies for viral marketing on social networks. In Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE '09), page to appear, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. P. Benway and D. M. Lane. Banner blindness: Web searchers often miss "obvious" links. ITG Newsletter, 1(3), 1998. http://www.internettg.org/newsletter/dec98/banner_blindness.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Bergemann and D. Ozmen. Optimal pricing with recommender systems. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '06), pages 43--51, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. O. N. Bondareva. Some applications of linear programming methods to the theory of cooperative games. Problemy Kybernetiki, 10:119--139, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. J. Brown and P. H. Reingen. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 14(3):350--62, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Burke, A. Hornof, E. Nilsen, and N. Gorman. High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactaction, 12(4):423--445, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Chatterjee, D. L. Hoffman, and T. P. Novak. Modeling the clickstream: Implications for web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Science, 22:520--541, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD '01), pages 57--66, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Feldman, S. Muthukrishnan, M. Pal, and C. Stein. Budget optimization in search-based advertising auctions. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '07), pages 40--49, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Fernandez and B. Nahata. Pay what you like. Technical Report 16265, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Friend vouch, 2008. http://www.friendvouch.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. C. B. Garcia, M. Ekstrom, and H. Björnsson. Hyriwyg: leveraging personalization to elicit honest recommendations. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '04), pages 232--233, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Gillies. Contributions to the Theory of Games IV, chapter Solutions to general non-zero-sum games, pages 47---85. Princeton University Press, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R. Grewal, T. W. Cline, and A. Davies. Early-entrant advantage, word-of-mouth communication, brand similarity, and the consumer decision-making process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3):187--197, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1):5--53, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. M. Herr, F. R. Kardes, and J. Kim. Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4):454--462, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. KDD, pages 137--146, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Lahaie. An analysis of alternative slot auction designs for sponsored search. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '06), pages 218--227, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Lahaie, D. Pennock, A. Saberi, and R. Vohra. Algorithmic Game Theory, chapter Sponsored Search Auctions, pages 699--716. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '06), pages 228--237, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Mantzaris. Pay-what-you-like restaurants, 2008. http://www.budgettravel.com/bt-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022%902761.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. Maxwell. The Price is Wrong: Understanding What Makes a Price Seem Fair and the True Cost of Unfair Pricing. John Wiley and Sons, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. H. Moulin. Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making (Econometric Society Monographs). Cambridge University Press, July 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. R. B. Myerson. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Nash, J. F. The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2):155--162, 1950.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. N. Ohta, V. Conitzer, Y. Satoh, A. Iwasaki, and M. Yokoo. Anonymity-proof shapley value: Extending shapley value for coalitional games in open environments. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 927--934, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. K. Patel and R. G. P. Kantamneni. Monetizing low value clickers. United States Patent Application 20080249854, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. P. H. Reingen, B. L. Foster, J. J. Brown, and S. B. Seidman. Brand congruence in interpersonal relations: A social network analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3):771--783, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. J. J. Rotemberg. Fair pricing. Technical Report 10915, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. L. S. Shapley. Contributions to the Theory of Games II, chapter A Value for n-person Games, pages 307---317. Princeton University Press, 1953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. L. S. Shapley. On balanced sets and cores. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 14:453--460, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. U. Shardanand and P. Maes. Social information filtering: algorithms for automating "word of mouth". In SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '95), pages 210--217, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. A. Singla and I. Weber. Camera brand congruence in the flickr social graph. In Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '09), pages 252--261, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Maximizing revenue from strategic recommendations under decaying trust

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '12: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
        October 2012
        2840 pages
        ISBN:9781450311564
        DOI:10.1145/2396761

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 October 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader