ABSTRACT
Suppose your sole interest in recommending a product to me is to maximize the amount paid to you by the seller for a sequence of recommendations. How should you recommend optimally if I become more inclined to ignore you with each irrelevant recommendation you make? Finding an answer to this question is a key challenge in all forms of marketing that rely on and explore social ties; ranging from personal recommendations to viral marketing.
We prove that even if the recommendee regains her initial trust on each successful recommendation, the expected revenue the recommender can make over an infinite period due to payments by the seller is bounded. This can only be overcome when the recommendee also incrementally regains trust during periods without any recommendation. Here, we see a connection to "banner blindness," suggesting that showing fewer ads can lead to a higher long-term revenue.
- Z. Abrams, O. Mendelevitch, and J. Tomlin. Optimal delivery of sponsored search advertisements subject to budget constraints. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '07), pages 272--278, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. E. Andrews, R. Askey, and R. Roy. Special functions. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
- D. Arthur, M. Motwani, A. Sharma, and Y. Xu. Pricing strategies for viral marketing on social networks. In Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE '09), page to appear, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. P. Benway and D. M. Lane. Banner blindness: Web searchers often miss "obvious" links. ITG Newsletter, 1(3), 1998. http://www.internettg.org/newsletter/dec98/banner_blindness.html.Google Scholar
- D. Bergemann and D. Ozmen. Optimal pricing with recommender systems. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '06), pages 43--51, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. N. Bondareva. Some applications of linear programming methods to the theory of cooperative games. Problemy Kybernetiki, 10:119--139, 1963.Google Scholar
- J. J. Brown and P. H. Reingen. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 14(3):350--62, 1987.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Burke, A. Hornof, E. Nilsen, and N. Gorman. High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactaction, 12(4):423--445, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Chatterjee, D. L. Hoffman, and T. P. Novak. Modeling the clickstream: Implications for web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Science, 22:520--541, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD '01), pages 57--66, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Feldman, S. Muthukrishnan, M. Pal, and C. Stein. Budget optimization in search-based advertising auctions. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '07), pages 40--49, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Fernandez and B. Nahata. Pay what you like. Technical Report 16265, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Friend vouch, 2008. http://www.friendvouch.com.Google Scholar
- A. C. B. Garcia, M. Ekstrom, and H. Björnsson. Hyriwyg: leveraging personalization to elicit honest recommendations. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '04), pages 232--233, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Gillies. Contributions to the Theory of Games IV, chapter Solutions to general non-zero-sum games, pages 47---85. Princeton University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
- R. Grewal, T. W. Cline, and A. Davies. Early-entrant advantage, word-of-mouth communication, brand similarity, and the consumer decision-making process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3):187--197, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1):5--53, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. M. Herr, F. R. Kardes, and J. Kim. Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4):454--462, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. KDD, pages 137--146, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Lahaie. An analysis of alternative slot auction designs for sponsored search. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '06), pages 218--227, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Lahaie, D. Pennock, A. Saberi, and R. Vohra. Algorithmic Game Theory, chapter Sponsored Search Auctions, pages 699--716. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
- J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. In Conference on Electronic commerce (EC '06), pages 228--237, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Mantzaris. Pay-what-you-like restaurants, 2008. http://www.budgettravel.com/bt-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022%902761.html.Google Scholar
- S. Maxwell. The Price is Wrong: Understanding What Makes a Price Seem Fair and the True Cost of Unfair Pricing. John Wiley and Sons, 2008.Google Scholar
- H. Moulin. Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making (Econometric Society Monographs). Cambridge University Press, July 1991.Google Scholar
- R. B. Myerson. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- J. Nash, J. F. The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2):155--162, 1950.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Ohta, V. Conitzer, Y. Satoh, A. Iwasaki, and M. Yokoo. Anonymity-proof shapley value: Extending shapley value for coalitional games in open environments. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 927--934, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
- K. Patel and R. G. P. Kantamneni. Monetizing low value clickers. United States Patent Application 20080249854, 2008.Google Scholar
- P. H. Reingen, B. L. Foster, J. J. Brown, and S. B. Seidman. Brand congruence in interpersonal relations: A social network analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3):771--783, 1984.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. J. Rotemberg. Fair pricing. Technical Report 10915, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. S. Shapley. Contributions to the Theory of Games II, chapter A Value for n-person Games, pages 307---317. Princeton University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
- L. S. Shapley. On balanced sets and cores. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 14:453--460, 1967.Google ScholarCross Ref
- U. Shardanand and P. Maes. Social information filtering: algorithms for automating "word of mouth". In SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '95), pages 210--217, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Singla and I. Weber. Camera brand congruence in the flickr social graph. In Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '09), pages 252--261, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Maximizing revenue from strategic recommendations under decaying trust
Recommendations
Revenue-Maximizing Auctions: A Bidder’s Standpoint
A vast part of the Internet economy is powered by advertising, much of which is sold at auction. A key question for sellers is how to optimize the auction mechanism they use. Bidders, conversely, try to optimize their bidding strategy. Incentive ...
We address the problem of improving bidders’ strategies in prior-dependent revenue-maximizing auctions and introduce a simple and generic method to design novel bidding strategies whenever the seller uses past bids to optimize her mechanism. We propose a ...
Music recommendations for groups of users
ImmersiveMe '13: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international workshop on Immersive media experiencesThis paper presents an algorithm capable of providing meaningful recommendations to small sets of users. We consider not only rating patterns, bias tendencies, and temporal fluctuations, but also group-leaders. The approach here presented intends to ...
Revenue maximizing envy-free multi-unit auctions with budgets
EC '12: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic CommerceWe study envy-free (EF) mechanisms for multi-unit auctions with budgeted agents that approximately maximize revenue. In an EF auction, prices are set so that every bidder receives a bundle that maximizes her utility amongst all bundles; We show that the ...
Comments