skip to main content
10.1145/2401796.2401810acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageskoli-callingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Self-directed learning: stories from industry

Published:15 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We report preliminary results from an ongoing investigation of how computing professionals perceive and value self-directed learning, based on a qualitative analysis of interviews with ten computing professionals. The professionals expect that future colleagues will have a well-developed ability to learn on their own. They indicate that professionals use a range of resources, strategies, and collaborators to help them learn. They find their work-related self-directed learning enjoyable, expressing a sense of confidence and pride; yet they often also find it to be a stressful never-ending process.

References

  1. S. Beecham, N. Baddoo, T. Hall, H. Robinson, and H. Sharp. Motivation in software engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 50:860--878, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Boustedt, A. Eckerdal, R. McCartney, K. Sanders, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. Students' perceptions of the differences between formal and informal learning. In Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research, ICER '11, pages 61--68, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Cheetham and G. Chivers. How professionals learn in practice: an investigation of informal learning amongst people working in professions. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(5):248--292, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. K. Collin. Connecting work and learning: design engineers' learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(7/8):403--413, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. B. Dorn and M. Guzdial. Graphic designers who program as informal computer science learners. In ICER '06: Proc. of the second intl. workshop on computing education research, pages 127--134, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Dorn and M. Guzdial. Discovering computing: perspectives of web designers. In ICER '10: Proc. of the sixth intl. workshop on computing education research, pages 23--30, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. R. Garrison. Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1):18--33, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. James-Gordon and J. Bal. The emerging self-directed learning methods for design engineers. The Learning Organization, 10(1):63--69, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Kira. Learning in the process of industrial work -- a comparative study of finland, sweden and germany. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(2):86--102, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. S. Knowles. Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press, New York, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T. C. Lethbridge. What knowledge is important to a software professional? Computer, 33(5):44--50, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. C. Lohman. Factors influencing teachers' engagement in informal learning activities. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(3):141--156, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. R. McCartney, A. Eckerdal, J. E. Moström, K. Sanders, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. Computing students learning computing informally. In Proc. of the 10th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. McCartney, A. Eckerdal, J. E. Mostrom, K. Sanders, and C. Zander. Successful students' strategies for getting unstuck. In Proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, ITiCSE '07, pages 156--160, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Mittendorff, F. Geijsel, A. Hoeve, M. de Laat, and L. Nieuwenhuis. Communities of practice as stimulating forces for collective learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(5):298--312, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. I. Rus and M. Lindvall. Knowledge management in software engineering. IEEE Software, 19(3):26--38, May/June 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Skule. Learning conditions at work: a framework to understand and assess informal learning in the workplace. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(1):8--20, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. L. Svensson, P.-E. Ellstrom, and C. Aberg. Integrating formal and informal learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(7):479--491, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Self-directed learning: stories from industry

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Koli Calling '12: Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
      November 2012
      187 pages
      ISBN:9781450317955
      DOI:10.1145/2401796

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 November 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate80of182submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader