skip to main content
research-article

Mining anatomical, physiological and pathological information from medical images

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 December 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The field of medical imaging has shown substantial growth over the last decade. Even more dramatic increase was observed in the use of machine learning and data mining techniques within this field. In this paper, we discuss three aspects related to information mining in the domain of medical imaging: the target user groups (for whom), the information to mine (what), and technologies to enable mining (how). Specifically, we focus on three types of information: anatomical, physiological and pathological, and present use cases for each one of them. Furthermore, we introduce representative methods and algorithms that are effective for solving these problems. We conclude the paper by discussing some major trends in the related domains for the coming decade.

References

  1. P. Angelini, J. A. Velasco, and S. Flamm. Coronary Anomalies: Incidence, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Relevance. Circulation, 105:2449--2454, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. G. Fletcher, F. Booya, R. M. Summers, D. Roy, L. Guendel, B. Schmidt, C H McCollough, and J L Fidler. Comparative Performance of Two Polyp Detection Systems on CT Colonography. American Journal of Roentgenology, 189(2):277--282, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. T. W. Freer and M. J. Ulissey. Screening Mammography with Computer-aided Detection: Prospective Study of 12,860 Patients in a Community Breast Center. Radiology, 220:781--786, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Guggenberger, P. Eppenberger, D. Markovic, D. Nanz, A. Chhabra, K. P. Pruessmann, and G Andreisek. MR neurography of the median nerve at 3.0T: Optimization of diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography. European Journal of Radiology, 81(7):e775--782, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Hermosillo, C. Chefdhotel, K. H. Herrmann, G. Bousquet, L. Bogoni, K. Chaudhuri, D. R. Fischer, C. Geppert, R. Janka, and A. Krishnan. Multi Modality State-of-the-Art Medical Image Segmentation and Registration Methodologies, chapter Image Registration in Medical Imaging: Applications, Methods, and Clinical Evaluation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. F. Kircher, H. Hricak, and S. M. Larson. Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care. Molecular Oncology, 6(2):182--195, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. B. Krishnapuram, J. Stoeckel, V. C. Raykar, R. B. Rao, P. Bamberger, E. Ratner, N. Merlet, I. Stainvas, M. Abramov, and A. Manevitch. Multiple instance learning improves CAD detection of masses in digital mammography. In Proceedings of the 9th international workshop on Digital Mammography, pages 350--357. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. B. W. Larsson, T. Y. Lee, N. A. Mayr, G. J. M. Parker, R. E. Port, J. Taylor, and R. M. Weisshoff. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced t1-weighted mri of diffusable tracer: a common global language for standardized quantities and symbols. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 19:223--232, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Lu, J. Bi, S. Yu, Z. Peng, A. Krishnan, and X. S. Zhou. Hierarchical learning for tubular structure parsing in medical imaging: A study on coronary arteries using 3D CT Angiography. In IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Patterson II, A. Minagar, N. Natarajan, and A. Takalkar. Alzheimer's disease detection with objective statistical evaluation of FDG-PET brain scans: essential methodology for early identification. Future Neurology, 5(2):259--276, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Z. Peng, Y. Zhan, X. S. Zhou, and A. Krishnan. Robust anatomy detection from CT topograms. In Proceedings of SPIE. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. V. C. Raykar, B. Krishnapuram, J. Bi, M. Dundar, and R. B. Rao. Bayesian multiple instance learning: Automatic feature selection and inductive transfer. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 808--815. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. V. C. Raykar, S. Yu, L. H. Zhao, G. H. Valadez, C. Florin, L. Bogoni, and L. Moy. Learning from crowds. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:1297--1322, April 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. D. Rubin. Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. European Journal of Radiology, 36(2):74--80, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. G. K. Thawait, A. Chhabra, and J. A. Carrino. Spine segmentation and enumeration and normal variants. Radiol Clin North Am, 105:587--98, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Y. Zhan, M. Dewan, M. Harder, A. Krishnan, and X. S. Zhou. Robust Automatic Knee MR Slice Positioning Through Redundant and Hierarchical Anatomy Detection. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 30(12):2087--2100, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Y. Zhan, M. Dewan, and X. S. Zhou. Cross Modality Deformable Segmentation Using Hierarchical Clustering and Learning. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Y. Zhan, M. Dewan, and X. S. Zhou. Robust MR spine detection using hierarchical learning and local articulated model. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (to appear). 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Y. Zhan, X. S. Zhou, Z. Peng, and A. Krishnan. Active scheduling of organ detection and segmentation in whole-body medical images. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Zhang, Y. Zhan, M. Dewan, K. Huang, D. N. Metaxas, and X. S. Zhou. Towards robust and effective shape modeling: Sparse shape composition. Medical Image Analysis, 16(1):265--277, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. X. S. Zhou, A. Gupta, and D. Comaniciu. An information fusion framework for robust shape tracking. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(1):115--129, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mining anatomical, physiological and pathological information from medical images

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
      ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter  Volume 14, Issue 1
      June 2012
      55 pages
      ISSN:1931-0145
      EISSN:1931-0153
      DOI:10.1145/2408736
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 December 2012

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader