skip to main content
10.1145/2424321.2424375acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Probabilistic sequential POIs recommendation via check-in data

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

While on the go, people are using their phones as a personal concierge discovering what is around and deciding what to do. Mobile phone has become a recommendation terminal customized for individuals. While existing research predominantly focuses on one-step recommendation---recommending the next single activity according to current context, this work moves one step beyond by recommending a series of activities, which is a package of sequential Points of Interest (POIs). The recommended POIs are not only relevant to user context (i.e., current location, time, and check-in), but also personalized to his/her check-in history. We presents a probabilistic approach, which is highly motivated from a large-scale commercial mobile check-in data analysis, to ranking a list of sequential POI categories (e.g., "Japanese food" and "bar") and POIs (e.g., "I love sushi"). The approach enables users to plan consecutive activities on the move. Specifically, the probabilistic recommendation approach estimates the transition probability from one POI to another, conditioned on current context and check-in history in a Markov chain. To alleviate the discritization error and sparsity problem, we further introduce context collaboration and integrate prior information. Experiments on over 100k real-world check-in records and 20k POIs validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

References

  1. J. Borges and M. Levene. A comparison of scoring metrics for predicting the next navigation step with markov model-based systems. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 9(4):547--573, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. Davidson, B. Liebald, J. Liu, P. Nandy, T. V. Vleet, U. Gargi, S. Gupta, Y. He, M. Lambert, B. Livingston, and D. Sampath. The youtube video recommendation system. In Proc. RecSys, pages 293--296, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. D. Lane, D. Lymberopoulos, F. Zhao, and A. T. Campbell. Hapori: context-based local search for mobile phones using community behavioral modeling and similarity. In Proc. UbiComp, pages 109--118, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Sebastiani. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surv., 34(1):1--47, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. I. H. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 2nd edition, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Zhuang, T. Mei, S. C. H. Hoi, Y.-Q. Xu, and S. Li. When recommendation meets mobile: contextual and personalized recommendation on the go. In Proc. Ubicomp, pages 153--162, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Probabilistic sequential POIs recommendation via check-in data

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SIGSPATIAL '12: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
                November 2012
                642 pages
                ISBN:9781450316910
                DOI:10.1145/2424321

                Copyright © 2012 Authors

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 6 November 2012

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader