skip to main content
10.1145/2428736.2428804acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiwasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personalization in tag ontology learning for recommendation making

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 December 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due to the explosive growth of the Web, the domain of Web personalization has gained great momentum both in the research and commercial areas. One of the most popular web personalization systems is recommender systems. In recommender systems choosing user information that can be used to profile users is very crucial for user profiling. In Web 2.0, one facility that can help users organize Web resources of their interest is user tagging systems. Exploring user tagging behavior provides a promising way for understanding users' information needs since tags are given directly by users. However, free and relatively uncontrolled vocabulary makes the user self-defined tags lack of standardization and semantic ambiguity. Also, the relationships among tags need to be explored since there are rich relationships among tags which could provide valuable information for us to better understand users. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for learning tag ontology based on the widely used lexical database WordNet for capturing the semantics and the structural relationships of tags. We present personalization strategies to disambiguate the semantics of tags by combining the opinion of WordNet lexicographers and users' tagging behavior together. To personalize further, clustering of users is performed to generate a more accurate ontology for a particular group of users. In order to evaluate the usefulness of the tag ontology, we use the tag ontology in a pilot tag recommendation experiment for improving the recommendation performance by exploiting the semantic information in the tag ontology. The initial result shows that the personalized information has improved the accuracy of the tag recommendation.

References

  1. Adomavicius, G., and Tuzhilin, A. 2005. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Eng. 17, 6, 734--749. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baruzzo, A., Dattolo, A., Pudota, N. and Tasso, C. 2009. Recommending new tags using domain-ontologies, In Proceedings International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Workshops, 409--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bischoff, K., Firan, C. S., Nejdl, W. and Paiu, R. 2008. Can all tags be used for search? In Proceedings ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eirinaki, M. and Vazirgiannis, M. 2003. Web mining for web personalization, ACM Trans. Internet Tech. 3, 1 (Feb. 2003), 1--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fellbaum, C. (ed.), 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. García-Silva, A., Corcho, O., Alani, H. and Gómez-Pérez, A. 2012. Review of the state of the art: Discovering and associating semantics to tags in folksonomies, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 27, 1, 57--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Golder S. and Huberman, B. 2006. The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems, HP Labs Technical Report, http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/tags/tags.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B. and Scott, J. 2005. Social bookmarking tools (I), D-Lib Magazine, 11, 4, 1082--9873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hayes, C. and Avesani, P. 2007. Using tags and clustering to identify topic-relevant blogs. In Proceedings International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaschke, R., Marinho, L., Hotho, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L. and Stumme, G. 2008. Tag recommendations in social bookmarking systems, AI Communications, 21, 231--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Karypis Lab, CLUTO -- Software for Clustering High-Dimensional Datasets, http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/cluto/cluto/overview, downloaded Nov 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Liang, H., Xu, Y., Li, Y., Nayak, R. and Tao, X. 2010. Connecting users and items with weighted tags for personalized item recommendations. In Proceedings 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. ACM, 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lin, H., Davis, J. and Zhou, Y. 2009. An integrated approach to extracting ontological structures from folksonomies, The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, Springer, 654--668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lipczak, M., Hu, Y., Kollet, Y., and Milios, E. 2009. Tag sources for recommendation in collaborative tagging systems, In Proceedings European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases Discovery Challenge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu, K., Fang, B. and Zhang, W. 2010. Ontology emergence from folksonomies, In Proceedings ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 1109--1118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D. and Davis, M. 2006. HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read, In Proceedings The Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mika, P. 2007. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. Web Semantics. 5, 1, Elsevier, 5--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Millen, D., Feinberg, J. and Kerr, B. 2006. Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mobasher, B., Cooley, R. and Srivastava, J. 2000. Automatic personalization based on web usage mining, Commun. ACM. 43, 8 (Aug. 2000), 142--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mulvenna, M. D., Anand, S. S. and Buchner, A. G. 2000. Personalization on the net using web mining, Commun. ACM. 43, 8 (Aug. 2000), 123--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Navigli, R., Velardi, P. and Gangemi, A. 2003. Ontology learning and its application to automated terminology translation", IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18, 1, IEEE, 22--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shepitsen, A., Gemmell, J., Mobasher, B., and Burke, R. 2008. Personalized recommendation in social tagging systems using hierarchical clustering. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems, 259--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sigurbjörnsson, B. and van Zwol, R. 2008. Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge, In Proceedings International World Wide Web Conference, 327--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Srivastava, J., Cooley, R., Deshpande, M. and Tan, P.-N. 2000. Web usage mining: Discovery and applications of usage patterns from web data. SIGKDD Explorations 1, 2 (Jan. 2000), 12--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Suchanek, F. M., Vojnovic, M. and Gunawardena, D. 2008. Social tags: Meaning and suggestions. In Proceedings ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 223--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tang, J., Leung, H., Luo, Q., Chen, D. and Gong, J. 2009. Towards ontology learning from folksonomies, In Proceedings 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2089--2094. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tatu, M., Srikanth, M. and D'Silva, T. 2008. RSDC'08: Tag recommendations using bookmark content. In Proceedings European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases Discovery Challenge. Springer, 96--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. te Braak, P., Abdullah, N. and Xu, Y. 2009. Improving the performance of collaborative filtering recommender systems through user profile clustering. In Proceedings of Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology Workshops, 147--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Trabelsi, C., Jrad, A. B., and Yahia, S. B., Bridging folksonomies and domain ontologies: Getting out non-taxonomic relations", In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, IEEE, 369--379. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Wetzker, R., Zimmermann, C. and Bauckhage, C. 2008. Analyzing social bookmarking systems: A del.icio.us cookbook, In Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Personalization in tag ontology learning for recommendation making

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IIWAS '12: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
          December 2012
          432 pages
          ISBN:9781450313063
          DOI:10.1145/2428736

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 December 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader