skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441845acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Putting ubiquitous crowd-sourcing into context

Published:23 February 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ubiquitous crowd-sourcing has become a popular mechanism to harvest knowledge from the masses. OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a successful example of ubiquitous crowd-sourcing, where citizens volunteer geographic information in order to build and maintain an accurate map of the changing world. Research has shown that OSM information is accurate, by comparing it with centrally maintained spatial information such as Ordnance Survey. However, we find that coverage is low and non uniformly distributed, thus challenging the suitability of ubiquitous crowd-sourcing as a mechanism to map the whole world. In this paper, we investigate what contextual factors correlate with coverage of OSM information in urban settings. We find that, although there is a direct correlation between population density and information coverage, other socio-economic factors also play an important role. We discuss the implications of these findings with respect to the design of urban crowd-sourcing applications.

References

  1. S. Brunn, J. Williams, and D. Zeigler. Cities Of The World: World Regional Urban Development. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Girres and G. Touya. Quality Assessment of the French OpenStreetMap Dataset. Transactions in GIS, 14(4):435--459, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. R. Glott, P. Schmidt, and R. Ghosh. Wikipedia Survey - overview of results. United Nations University: Collaborative Creativity Group, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Goodchild. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4):211--221, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Haklay. How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4):682--703, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Haklay, S. Basiouka, V. Antoniou, and A. Ather. How Many Volunteers Does it Take to Map an Area Well? The Validity of Linus Law to Volunteered Geographic Information. Cartographic Journal, The, 47(4):315--322, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Hargittai and E. Litt. The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults. New Media & Society, 13(5):824--842, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. B. Hecht and D. Gergle. Measuring self-focus bias in community-maintained knowledge repositories. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, pages 11--20. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Hecht and D. Gergle. On the localness of user-generated content. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 229--232. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. T. K. Lam, A. Uduwage, Z. Dong, S. Sen, D. R. Musicant, L. Terveen, and J. Riedl. WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia's Gender Imbalance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, pages 1--10. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Laniado, R. Tasso, Y. Volkovich, and A. Kaltenbrunner. When the Wikipedians Talk: Network and Tree Structure of Wikipedia Discussion Pages. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. I. Ludwig, A. Voss, and M. Krause-Traudes. A Comparison of the Street Networks of Navteq and OSM in Germany. Advancing Geoinformation Science for a Changing World, 1(2):65--84, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Mashhadi, G. Quattrone, L. Capra, and P. Mooney. On the Sustainability of Urban Crowd-sourcing for Maintaining Large-scale Geospatial Databases. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. I. Masser. Governments and Geographic Information. Taylor and Francis, London, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. K. Panciera, R. Priedhorsky, T. Erickson, and L. Terveen. Lurking? Cyclopaths? A Quantitative Lifecycle Analysis of User Behavior in a Geowiki. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1917--1926. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. K. A. Panciera, M. Masli, and L. G. Terveen. "How should i go from _ to _ without getting killed?" Motivation and Benefits in Open Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, pages 183--192, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Popescu and G. Grefenstette. Mining user home location and gender from Flickr tags. In Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Priedhorsky, B. Jordan, and L. Terveen. How a Personalized Geowiki Can Help Bicyclists Share Information More Effectively. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, pages 93--98, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. Priedhorsky, M. Masli, and L. Terveen. Eliciting and Focusing Geographic Volunteer Work. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 61--70. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. Priedhorsky and L. Terveen. The Computational Geowiki: What, Why, and How. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 267--276. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. Roth, S. M. Kang, M. Batty, and M. Barthlemy. Structure of Urban Movements: Polycentric Activity and Entangled Hierarchical fFows. PLoS ONE, 6(1), 01 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. J. Schradie. The Digital Production Gap: The Digital Divide and Web 2.0 Collide. Poetics, 39(2):145--168, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Y. Volkovich, S. Scellato, D. Laniado, C. Mascolo, and A. Kaltenbrunner. The Length of Bridge Ties: Structural and Geographic Properties of Online Social Interactions. In Proceedings of the 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Voss. Measuring Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, pages 24--28, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. D. Zielstra and A. Zipf. A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Geographic Information Science, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Zook, M. Graham, T. Shelton, and S. Gorman. Volunteered Geographic Information and Crowdsourcing Disaster Relief: A Case Study of the Haitian Earthquake. World Medical and Health Policy, 2(2), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Putting ubiquitous crowd-sourcing into context

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      February 2013
      1594 pages
      ISBN:9781450313315
      DOI:10.1145/2441776

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 February 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader