skip to main content
10.1145/2442952.2442964acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

wq: a modular framework for collecting, storing, and utilizing experiential VGI

Published:06 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present "wq", an open-source framework for developing robust applications allowing volunteers to collect geographic information (VGI) in the field. Successful VGI applications been deployed in various contexts, but much of the effort that is put into common programming tasks cannot be re-used, often because the application code is too closely tied to the problem domain. User-friendly campaign authoring tools are being explored as ways to facilitate the rapid deployment of VGI applications, but many of these tools necessarily enforce a restricted vocabulary of interface elements and database models, limiting their usefulness for more complex VGI project workflows. In contrast, we propose a highly modular, open-source approach that enables reuse of general-purpose components created to facilitate common design patterns -- without enforcing any hard limitations on the database model or interface. The framework builds off of and extends numerous existing open-source projects and leverages open standards (e.g. HTML5), which means it will work across all popular mobile devices as well as desktop browsers. The ideas behind wq arose from our ongoing efforts to generalize an existing data collection application initially created for community-based stream quality monitoring. In this paper we justify the design decisions made in creating wq and suggest general principles that should be taken into consideration when designing systems for collecting, storing, and utilizing VGI.

References

  1. A. Ciaghi and A. Villafiorita. Crowdsourcing ICTD best practices. In ICST AFRICOMM '11, pages 167--176. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Goodchild. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4):211--221, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Haklay and P. Weber. OpenStreetMap: user-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4):12--18, Dec. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Hupfer, M. Muller, S. Levy, D. Gruen, A. Sempere, S. Ross, and R. Priedhorsky. MoCoMapps: mobile collaborative map-based applications. In ACM CSCW Companion '12, page 43--44. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Keith. Hijax. http://domscripting.com/blog/display/41/, Jan. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Kim and E. Paulos. A subscription-based authoring tool for mobile citizen science campaigns. In ACM CHI Extended Abstracts '12, page 2135--2140. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Kim, C. Robson, T. Zimmerman, J. Pierce, and E. M. Haber. Creek watch: pairing usefulness and usability for successful citizen science. In ACM CHI '11, page 2125--2134. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. LeRoux. PhoneGap beliefs, Goals, and Philosophy http://phonegap.com/2012/05/09/phonegap-beliefs-goals-and-philosophy, May 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M.-A. Manso and M. Wachowicz. GIS design: A review of current issues in interoperability. Geography Compass, 3(3):1105--1124, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. O. Okolloh. Ushahidi, or 'testimony': Web 2.0 tools for crowdsourcing crisis information. Participatory Learning and Action, 59(1):65--70, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Priedhorsky and L. Terveen. Wiki grows up: arbitrary data models, access control, and beyond. In ACM WikiSym '11, page 63--71. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. A. Sheppard and L. Terveen. Quality is a verb: the operationalization of data quality in a citizen science community. In ACM WikiSym '11, page 29--38. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. W. Song and G. Sun. The role of mobile volunteered geographic information in urban management. In Geoinformatics, 2010 18th International Conference on, pages 1--5, June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. K. Starbird, L. Palen, A. L. Hughes, and S. Vieweg. Chatter on the red: what hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information. In ACM CSCW '10, page 241--250. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. L. Sullivan, C. L. Wood, M. J. Iliff, R. E. Bonney, D. Fink, and S. Kelling. eBird: a citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation, 142(10):2282--2292, Oct. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. F. Torre, S. A. Sheppard, R. Priedhorsky, and L. Terveen. bumpy, caution with merging: an exploration of tagging in a geowiki. In ACM GROUP '10, page 155--164. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Wiggins and K. Crowston. From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In HICSS '11, page 1--10. IEEE Computer Society, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. wq: a modular framework for collecting, storing, and utilizing experiential VGI

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GEOCROWD '12: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Crowdsourced and Volunteered Geographic Information
          November 2012
          98 pages
          ISBN:9781450316941
          DOI:10.1145/2442952

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 November 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate17of30submissions,57%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader