skip to main content
10.1145/2442952.2442966acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Spatial knowledge interchange environment: leveraging web 2.0 technologies to breach the knowledge divide in agricultural development

Published:06 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Agricultural output has been declining in the Caribbean although several strategies are being implemented to enhance development. The dichotomy between modern external experts (MEE) and locally grounded experts (LGE) generates a fracture that limits agricultural development and hinders good governance. There is a need for a change in the language and interface for decision making in local rural villages amongst stakeholders. This paper discusses the use of modern web technology in support of collaborative exercises that bring agricultural practitioners and their traditional knowledge closer to more remote, modern external experts.

A more people friendly spatial language application will be explored, harnessing volunteered geographic information (VGI) and participatory decision making on an ESRI ArcGIS platform, while leveraging Web 2.0 technologies that will support knowledge building for agricultural development. Participation represents a new developmental paradigm that fosters empowerment and is needed at the domestic level to propagate a strong sense of democracy in the decision-making process enabling the micro actor, cultivating greater involvement, accountability and thus more sustainable solutions. The effective management of agricultural land and its resources require spatial data that is current, reliable and easily accessible. By extension, this will require systematized informal data and simplified formal data to incorporate and network a functional participatory program for agricultural development.

References

  1. Adobe. 2012. "What is Flex?" Accessed August 12 2012. http://flex.org/what-is-flex/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bock, Lee and Dan O'Leary. 2010. "Building Rich Internet Applications with the ArcGIS API for Flex." ESRI Federal User Conference February 17--19. Washington D.CGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonmati, Binian, ed. 2004. "Scientific Knowledge and Cultural Diversity Forum of Cultures. Barcelona." In Forum of Cultures, 2004, Barcelona.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckens, Marie-Martine. 2011. "Innovations in Extension and Advisory Services: Meeting the Needs of Farmers." The Courier 23:14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, A. 2004. "Study of the Urban Management Systems of a "Twin Island" Developing State: A Case Study of Trinidad and Tobago." In 40th ISoCaRP Congress, 18--22 September, 2004, 1--10, Geneva.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, C. and G. Parcell. 2007. Learning to fly: practical knowledge management from leading and learning organisations. New Dehli: Wiley India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Contact. 2012. "About Trinidad and Tobago. Trinidad and Tobago Chamber of Industry and Commerce." Accessed January 12, 2011. http://www.contacttt.com/index.cfm?content=59&Menu=18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C News. 2011. "T&T has highest cell phone penetration in the world." Accessed August 12, 2012. http://www.ctntworld.com/LocalArticles.aspx?id=33208Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). 2006. "Precision Agriculture: profiting from variation." Accessed September 25th 2012. http://www.csiro.au/en/Outcomes/Food-and-Agriculture/PrecisionAgriculture.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, Micheal. 2006. "Bridging the Gap or Crossing a Bridge? Indigenous knowledge and the language of law and Policy." In Bridging scales and knowledge systems, edited by Walter V. Reid. London: World Resources Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Decrem, Bart. 2006. "Introducing flock Beta 1." Accessed August 10 2012. http://www.flock.com/node/4500Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. DiNucci, Darcy. 1999. "Fragmented Future." Print 53 (4): 32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ericksen, P., and E. Woodley. 2005. "Using multiple knowledge systems: benefits and challenges." In Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments, edited by D. Capistrano, C. Samper., M. J. Lee, and C. Raudsepp-Hearne, 85--117. Washington: Island Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Guana, E. 1998. "The Environmental Justice Misfit: Public Participation and the Paradigm Paradox." Stanford Environmental Law Journal 17 (1): 3--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Haklay, Muki. 2007. "Web 2.0 Notion of Democratisation and Participatory GIS." Usability of Geospatial Technologies, GIScience & Environmental Information, November 17. Accessed August 9th 2012. http://povesham.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/web-20-notion-of-democratisation-and-participatory-gis/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, Eric Micheal. 2011. "The Primate Diaries have moved to scientific American." The Primate Diaries, July 5. Accessed July 5, 2011. http://scienceblogs.com/primatediaries/2011/07/05/the-primate-diaries-has-moved/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Josanov, Borislav. 2011. "Web 2.0 and GIS: between synergy effects and oxymoron." Management Information Systems 6 (1): 3--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Matthews, Mary M. and Glenroy Ennis. 2009. "Strategic Environmental Assessment for the National Adaptation Strategy." NIRAS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. McDougal, Kevin. 2012. "An Assessment of the Contribution of Volunteered Geographic Information during Recent Natural Disasters." In Global Geospatial Conference, GSDI 13 Conference, 14--17 May, 2012, Quebec: Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ocholla, Dennis N. 2007. "Marginalized Knowledge: An Agenda for Indigenous Knowledge Development and Integration with other Forms of Knowledge." International Review on Information Ethics 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. O'Reilly, Tim. 2005. "What is Web 2.0. O'Reilly Spreading the Knowledge of innovators." Accessed August 9 2012. http://oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html?page=1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rambaldi G., Kyem, P. A. K., Mbile P. McCall M. and Weiner D. 2005. "Participatory Spatial Information Management and Communication in Developing Countries." In Mapping for Change International Conference, 7--10 September. Nairobi, Kenya.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Reuters, Thomson. 2012. "Web access via mobile phone trumps PC in China: report". Accessed August 12, 2012. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/19/us-china-internet-idUSBRE86I0FC20120719Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Roche, Stéphane, Boris Mericskay, Wided Batita, Matthieu Bach and Matthieu Rondeau. 2012. "WikiGI Basic Concepts: Web 2.0 for Geospatial Collaboration." Future Internet 4 (1): 265--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rutherford, Camile. 2010. Using online social media to support preservice student engagement." Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 6 (4): 703--711.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharma, Prashant. 2008. "Core Characteristics of Web 2.0 Services." Accessed August 9, 2012. www.techpluto.com/web-20-services/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Telecommunications Authority of Trinidad and Tobago (TATT). 2010. "Annual Market Report: Telecommunications and Broadcasting Sectors." TATT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Spatial knowledge interchange environment: leveraging web 2.0 technologies to breach the knowledge divide in agricultural development

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GEOCROWD '12: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Crowdsourced and Volunteered Geographic Information
        November 2012
        98 pages
        ISBN:9781450316941
        DOI:10.1145/2442952

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 November 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate17of30submissions,57%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader