skip to main content
10.1145/2461381.2461397acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

In-pavement wireless weigh-in-motion

Published:08 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Truck weight data is used in many areas of transportation such as weight enforcement and pavement condition assessment. This paper describes a wireless sensor network (WSN) that estimates the weight of moving vehicles from pavement vibrations caused by vehicular motion. The WSN consists of: acceleration sensors that report pavement vibration; vehicle detection sensors that report a vehicle's arrival and departure times; and an access point (AP) that synchronizes all the sensors and records the sensor data. The paper also describes a novel algorithm that estimates a vehicle's weight from pavement vibration and vehicle detection data, and calculates pavement deflection in the process. A prototype of the system has been deployed near a conventional Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) system on I-80 W in Pinole, CA. Weights of 52 trucks at different speeds and loads were estimated by the system under different pavement temperatures and varying environmental conditions, adding to the challenges the system must overcome. The error in load estimates was less than 10% for gross weight and 15% for individual axle weights. Different states have different requirements for WIM but the system described here outperformed the nearby conventional WIM, and meets commonly used standards in United States. The system also opens up exciting new opportunities for WSNs in pavement engineering and intelligent transportation.

References

  1. M. Arraigada, M. Partl, S. Angelone, and F. Martinez. Evaluation of accelerometers to determine pavement deflections under traffic loads. Materials and Structures, 42:779--790, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Bajwa, R. Rajagopal, P. Varaiya, and R. Kavaler. In-pavement wireless sensor network for vehicle classification. In Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2011 10th International Conference on, pages 85 --96, april 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Burnos, J. Gajda, P. Piwowar, R. Sroka, M. Stencel, and T..Zegle'n. Accurate weighing of moving vehicles. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 14(4):507--516, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Bushman and A. Pratt. Weigh in motion technology--economics and performance. In Presentation on the North American Travel Monitoring Exhibition and Conference (NATMEC). Charlotte, North Carolina, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Cebon. Handbook of Vehicle-Road Interaction. Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Ceriotti, L. Mottola, G. Picco, A. Murphy, S. Guna, M. Corra, M. Pozzi, D. Zonta, and P. Zanon. Monitoring heritage buildings with wireless sensor networks: The Torre Aquila deployment. In Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2009. IPSN 2009. International Conference on, pages 277--288. IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Y. Cheung, S. Coleri, B. Dundar, S. Ganesh, C.-W. Tan, and P. Varaiya. Traffic measurement and vehicle classification with single magnetic sensor. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1917:173--181, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Colibrys, Inc, [email protected]. MEMS Capacitive Accelerometers Datasheet MS9000.D.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Designation. E 1318--94, standard specifications for highway weigh-in-motion (wim) systems with user requirements and test methods. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Traffic Monitoring Guide, May 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. C. Fehler. Seismic Wave Propagation and Scattering in the Heterogenous Earth. Springer, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Gindy, H. H. Nassif, and J. Velde. Bridge displacement estimates from measured acceleration records. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2028(-1):136--145, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Haoui, R. Kavaler, and P. Varaiya. Wireless magnetic sensors for traffic surveillance. Transportation Research C, 16(3):294--306, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Kim, S. Pakzad, D. Culler, J. Demmel, G. Fenves, S. Glaser, and M. Turon. Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks. In IPSN '07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, pages 254--263, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. N. Knaian. A wireless sensor network for smart roadbeds and intelligent transportation systems. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Li and Y. Liu. Underground structure monitoring with wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, pages 69--78. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. Liu, L. Guo, J. Li, and X. Chen. Weigh-in-motion (wim) sensor based on em resonant measurements. In Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2007 IEEE, pages 561--564. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R. B. Malla, A. Sen, and N. W. Garrick. A special fiber optic sensor for measuring wheel loads of vehicles on highways. Sensors, 8(4):2551--2568, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. C. Merzbacher, A. Kersey, and E. Friebele. Fiber optic sensors in concrete structures: a review. Smart materials and structures, 5:196, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Parl, N. Buch, and K. Chatti. Effective layer temperature prediction model and temperature correction via falling weight deflectometer deflections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1764:97--111, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R. Rajagopal. Large Monitoring Systems: Data Analysis, Deployment and Design. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. Sawant, J. Tan, and Q. Yang. A sensor networked approach for intelligent transportation systems. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004. (IROS 2004). Proceedings. 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, volume 2, pages 1796 -- 1801 vol.2, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sensys Networks, Inc, 2650 9th Street, Berkeley CA 94710. The Sensys Wireless™ Vehicle Detection System, 1.1 edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. In-pavement wireless weigh-in-motion

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          IPSN '13: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks
          April 2013
          372 pages
          ISBN:9781450319591
          DOI:10.1145/2461381

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 April 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          IPSN '13 Paper Acceptance Rate24of115submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader