skip to main content
10.1145/2463372.2463426acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the behaviour of the (1, λ)-es for a conically constrained problem

Published:06 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider a conically constrained optimisation problem where the optimal solution lies at the apex of the cone and study the behaviour of a (1,λ)-ES that handles constraints by resampling infeasible candidate solutions. Expressions that describe the strategy's single-step behaviour are derived. Assuming that the mutation strength is adapted in a scale-invariant manner, a simple zeroth-order model is used to determine the speed of convergence of the strategy. We then derive expressions that approximately characterise the step size and convergence rate attained when using cumulative step size adaptation and compare the values with optimal ones.

References

  1. D. V. Arnold. Noisy Optimization with Evolution Strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. V. Arnold. Analysis of a repair mechanism for the (1,ł)-ES applied to a simple constrained problem. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference -- GECCO 2011, pages 853--860. ACM Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. V. Arnold. On the behaviour of the (1,ł)-ES for a simple constrained problem. In H.-G. Beyer and W. B. Langdon, editors, Foundations of Genetic Algorithms -- FOGA 2011, pages 15--24. ACM Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. V. Arnold. On the behaviour of the (1,ł)-σSA-ES for a constrained linear problem. In C. A. Coello Coello et al., editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature -- PPSN XII, pages 82--91. Springer Verlag, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. V. Arnold. Resampling versus repair in evolution strategies applied to a constrained linear problem. Evolutionary Computation, 2013. to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. V. Arnold and H.-G. Beyer. On the behaviour of evolution strategies optimising cigar functions. Evolutionary Computation, 18:661--682, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. V. Arnold and D. Brauer. On the behaviour of the $(1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 1)$-ES for a simple constrained problem. In G. Rudolph et al., editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature -- PPSN X, pages 1--10. Springer Verlag, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Auger and N. Hansen. Reconsidering the progress rate theory for evolution strategies in finite dimensions. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference -- GECCO 2006, pages 445--452. ACM Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. Balakrishnan and C. R. Rao. Order statistics: An introduction. In N. Balakrishnan et al., editors, Handbook of Statistics, volume 16, pages 3--24. Elsevier, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H.-G. Beyer. Ein Evolutionsverfahren zur mathematischen Modellierung station\"arer Zust\"ande in dynamischen Systemen. PhD thesis, Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen, Weimar, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H.-G. Beyer and H.-P. Schwefel. Evolution strategies -- A comprehensive introduction. Natural Computing, 1(1):3--52, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation, 9(2):159--195, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Z. Michalewicz and M. Schoenauer. Evolutionary algorithms for constrained parameter optimization problems. Evolutionary Computation, 4(1):1--32, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Ostermeier, A. Gawelczyk, and N. Hansen. Step-size adaptation based on non-local use of selection information. In Y. Davidor et al., editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature -- PPSN III, pages 189--198. Springer Verlag, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. I. Oyman, K. Deb, and H.-G. Beyer. An alternative constraint handling method for evolution strategies. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 612--619. IEEE Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. I. Rechenberg. Evolutionsstrategie -- Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution. Friedrich Frommann Verlag, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H.-P. Schwefel. Numerical Optimization of Computer Models. Wiley, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. H.-P. Schwefel. Evolution and Optimum Seeking. Wiley, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the behaviour of the (1, λ)-es for a conically constrained problem

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              GECCO '13: Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
              July 2013
              1672 pages
              ISBN:9781450319638
              DOI:10.1145/2463372
              • Editor:
              • Christian Blum,
              • General Chair:
              • Enrique Alba

              Copyright © 2013 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 6 July 2013

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              GECCO '13 Paper Acceptance Rate204of570submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

              Upcoming Conference

              GECCO '24
              Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
              July 14 - 18, 2024
              Melbourne , VIC , Australia

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader