Uncovering practices of making energy consumption accountable: A phenomenological inquiry

Abstract

Reacting to the discussion on global warming, the HCI community has started to explore the design of tools to support responsible energy consumption. An important part of this research focuses on motivating energy savings by providing feedback tools which present consumption metrics interactively. In this line of work, the configuration of feedback has been mainly discussed using cognitive or behavioral factors. This narrow focus, however, misses a highly relevant perspective for the design of technology that supports sustainable lifestyles: to investigate the multiplicity of forms in which individuals or collectives actually consume energy. In this article, we broaden this focus, by taking a phenomenological lens to study how people use off-the-shelf eco-feedback systems in private households to make energy consumption accountable and explainable. By reconstructing accounting practices, we delineate several constitutive elements of the phenomenon of energy usage in daily life. We complement these elements with a description of the sophisticated methods used by people to organize their energy practices and to give a meaning to their energy consumption. We describe these elements and methods, providing examples coming from the fieldwork and uncovering observed strategies to account for consumption. Based on our results, we provide a critical perspective on existing eco-feedback mechanisms and describe several elements for a design rationale for designing support for responsible energy consumption. We argue that interactive feedback systems should not simply be an end, but rather a resource for the construction of the artful practice of making energy consumption accountable.

References

1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., and Rothengatter, T. 2005. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. Environ. Psychol. 25, 273--291.
2. Blevis, E. 2007. Sustainable interaction design: Invention and disposal, renewal and reuse. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
3. Bonino, D., Corno, F., and Russis, L. D. 2012. Home energy consumption feedback: A user survey. Energy Build. 47, 383--393.
4. Brynjardottir, H., Hakansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E. P. S., Di Salvo, C., and Sengers, P. 2012. Sustainably unpersuaded: How persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (CHI'12). 947--956.
5. Bundesververbandverbraucherzentrale. 2010. Erfolgsfaktoren von smart metering aus verbrauchersicht, Verbraucherzantrale bundesverband e.V. In Innovation.
6. Burgess, J. and Nye, M. 2008. Re-materialising energy use through transparent monitoring systems. Energy 36, 4454--4459.
7. Button, G. and Dourish, P. 1996. Technomethodology: Paradoxes and possibilities. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'96). 19--29.
8. Chalmers, M. 2004. A historical view of context. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 13.
9. Chetty, M., Tran, D., and Grinter, R. E. 2008. Getting to green: Understanding resource consumption in the home. In Proceedings of the 10^th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'08). ACM Press, New York, 242--251.
10. Crabtree, A. 2003. Designing Collaborative Systems: A Practical Guide to Ethnography. Springer.
11. Crabtree, A. 2004a. Design in the absence of practice: Breaching experiments. In Proceedings of the 5^th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'04). ACM Press, New York, 59--68.
12. Crabtree, A. 2004b. Technomethodology. http://www.mrl.nott.ac.uk/~axc/documents/papers/RC3304.pdf.
13. Darby, S. 2001. Making it obvious: Designing feedback into energy consumption. In Proceedings of the 2^nd International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting. Springer, 685--696.
14. Darby, S. 2006. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A review for defra of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. http://www2.z3controls.com/doc/ECI-Effectiveness-of-Feedback.pdf.
15. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology (MISQ 89). Manag. Inf. Syst. Quart. 13, 319--339.
16. DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., and Brynjarsdottir, H. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable hci. In Proceedings of the 28^th International ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM Press, New York.
17. Dourish, P. 2004. What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal Ubiq. Comput. 8.
18. Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'06). 541.
19. Dourish, P. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: The politics of design and the design of politics. In Proceedings of the 8^th ACM Conference on Designing. 1--10.
20. EEA. 2011. Final electricity consumption by sector (ENER 018). Tech rep., European Environment Agency.
21. Egan, C. and Policy, E. 1995. How customers interpret and use comparative graphics of their energy use and use comparative graphics of their energy. Compar. General Pharmacol., 39--45.
22. EIA. 2011a. Annual energy review 2010. Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, Energy Information Agency, US Department of Energy, 407--407.
23. EIA. 2011b. International energy outlook 2011. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/.
24. Fallman, D. 2003. In romance with the materials of mobile interaction: A phenomenological approach to the design of mobile information technology. http://daniel.fallman.org/resources/thesis/ubfinal.pdf.
25. Fallman, D. 2011. The new good: Exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. http://daniel.fallman.org/resources/papers/chi2011-thenewgood.pdf.
26. Federal Statistical Office of Germany. 2011. Income, consumption and living standards - Households in the informations society (ICT). Tech. rep., Federal Statistical Office Germany, 182.
27. Fischer, C. 2008. Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1, 79--104.
28. Fitzpatrick, G. and Smith, G. 2009. Technology-enabled feedback on domestic energy consumption: Articulating a set of design concerns. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 8, 37--44.
29. Flick, U. 2006. Assessing the quality of qualitative health research: Criteria, process and writing. An Intro. Qualit. Res. 10, 384--387.
30. Flick, U. 2007. Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
31. Folstad, A. 2008. Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: A literature review. Electron. J. Virtual Organ. Netw. 10, 99--131.
32. Fraser, I. 1998. Hegel and Marx: The Concept of Need. Edinburgh University Press.
33. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., and Landay, J. 2010. The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM Press, New York.
34. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
35. Garfinkel, H. 1994. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Wiley-Blackwell.
36. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'03). 233.
37. Gram-Hanssen, K. 2009. Standby consumption in households analyzed with a practice theory approach. J. Industr. Ecol. 14, 150--165.
38. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., and Burgess, J. 2010. Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy 38, 6111--6119.
39. Hassenzahl, M. 2006. Hedonic, emotional, and experiential perspectives on product quality. In Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, C. Ghaoui, Ed., Idea Group, 266--272.
40. Hassenzahl, M. 2007. The hedonic/pragmatic model of user experience. In Proceedings of Towards a UX Manifesto COST294MAUSE Affiliated Workshop. E. L.-C. Law, A. P. O. S. Vermeeren, M. Hassenzahl, and M. Blythe, Eds., 10--14.
41. Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., and Koller, F. 2003. AttrakDiff: Ein fragebogen zur messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer qualität. Comput. 187--196.
42. He, H. A., Greenburg, S., and Huang, E. M. 2010. One size does not fit all: Applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design. http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47425/1/2009-943-22.pdf.
43. Ihde, D. 1978. Technics and Praxis: A Philosophy of Technology. Kluwer.
44. Ihde, D. 1986. Experimental Phenomenology: An Introduction. State University of New York Press.
45. Jacucci, G., Spagnolli, A., Gamberini, L., Bjorksog, C. O. M. B., and Monti, P. 2009. Designing effective feedback of electricity consumption for mobile user interfaces. PsychNology J. 7, 265--289.
46. Karjalainen, S. 2011. Consumer preferences for feedback on household electricity consumption. Energy Build. 43, 458--467.
47. Kempton, W. and Layne, L. L. 1994. The consumer's energy analysis environment∗ 1. Energy Policy 22, 857--866.
48. Kempton, W. and Montgomery, L. 1982. Folk quantification of energy. Energy 7, 817--827.
49. Mankoff, J., Matthews, D., Fussell, S. R., and Johnson, M. 2007. Leveraging social networks to motivate individuals to reduce their ecological footprints. In Proceedings of the 40^th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).
50. Maze, R. and Redstrom, J. 2008. Switch! Energy ecologies in everyday life. Int. J. Des. 2, 55--70.
51. Oevermann, U. 1993. Die objektive hermeneutik als unverzichtbare methodologische grundlage für die analyse von subjektivität. In ‘Wirklichkeit’ im Deutungsprozess. Verstehen und Methoden in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften, T. Jung and S. Muller-Doohm, Eds., 106--189.
52. Overgaard, S. and Zahavi, D. 2009. Phenomenological sociology - The subjectivity of everyday life. Sociol. The J. Brit. Sociol. Assoc., 1--23.
53. Paetz, A.-G., Dutschke, E., and Fichtner, W. 2011. Smart homes as a means to sustainable energy consumption: A study of consumer perceptions. J. Consumer Policy 35, 1--19.
54. Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. 2010. Designing for emotional attachment to energy. In Proceedings of the Design and Emotion Conference. 1--5.
55. Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. 2011. A phenomenology of human-electricity relations. In Proceedings of the Annual International ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11). ACM Press, New York, 2405--2408.
56. Pierce, J., Schiano, D. J., and Paulos, E. 2010. Home, habits, and energy: Examining domestic interactions and energy consumption. In Proceedings of the International ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). 1985--1994.
57. Pilz, D. 2007. Krisengeschöpfe. Zur Theorie und Methodologie der Objektiven Hermeneutik. Verl.
58. Roberts, S., Humphries, H., and Hyldon, V. 2004. Consumer preferences for improving energy consumption feedback. Res. rep., OFGEM Centre for Sustainable Energy.
59. Sellen, A. J., Fogg, A., Aitken, M., Hodges, S., Rother, C., and Wood, K. 2007. Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past? An experimental study using sensecam. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07).
60. Shove, E. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Berg.
61. Sokolowski, R. 2000. Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge University Press.
62. Stapel, D. and Suls, J. 2004. Method matters: Effects of explicit versus implicit social comparisons on activation, behavior, and self-views. J. Personality Social Psychol. 86, 860--875.
63. Statistisches Bundesamt. 2011. Einkommen, Konsum, Lebensbedingungen - Private Haushalte in der Informationsgesellschaft (IKT). Statistisches Bundesamt, 182.
64. Stern, P. C. 1992. What psychology knows about energy conservation. Amer. Psychol. 47, 8.
65. Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
66. Strengers, Y. A. A. 2011. Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11). ACM Press, New York, 2135--2144.
67. Suchman, L. 2006. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (Learning in Doing, Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives). Cambridge University Press.
68. Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., and Vetter, E. 2000. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. Sage Publications.
69. van Dam, S. S., Bakker, C. A., and van Hal, J. D. 2010. Home energy monitors: Impact over the medium-term. Build. Res. Inf. 38, 458--469.
70. Wilhite, H., Shove, E., Luzenhiser, L., and Kempton, W. 2000. Twenty years of energy demand management: We know more about individual behavior but how much do we really know about demand. In Proceedings from the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 435--453.
71. Winch, P. 1958. The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
72. Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J., and Augustin, S. A. 2008. Bright green perspective on sustainable choices. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08). 313--322.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing