ABSTRACT
In this paper, we examine the genres of communication in an activist case in a Norwegian municipality. As genres evolve over time, and the emergence of new genre properties is a sign of a mature technology, we compare the genres used in traditional paper-based media with the genres used in social media, to examine the maturity of social media as a medium for activist eParticipation. We also discuss the usage patterns of traditional vs. social media, and their relation to the public sphere. Our findings indicate that so far, the genres used for activism in social media are very similar to their offline counterparts, with some new genres and genre characteristics emerging. Social media is moving towards maturity, but still has a way to go.
- Macintosh, A., A. McKay-Hubbard, and D. Shell, Using Weblogs to Support Local Democracy, in E-Government: Towards Electronic Democracy2005. p. 1--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tambouris, E., N. Liotas, and K. Tarabanis, A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools, in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences2007: Hawaii. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jackson, N. A. and D. G. Lilleker, Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 2009. 6(3): p. 232--250.Google Scholar
- Gray, M. and M. Caul, Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997. Comparative Political Studies, 2000. 33(9): p. 1091--1122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Østerud, Ø., F. Engelstad, and P. Selle, Makten og demokratiet. En sluttbok fra makt- og demokratiutredningen2003, Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk. 344.Google Scholar
- Sæbø, Ø., J. Rose, and L. Skiftenes Flak, The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 2008. 25(3): p. 400--428.Google Scholar
- Brandtzæg, P. B. and M. Lüders, eCitizen 2.0: The Ordinary Citizen as a Supplier of Public Sector Information, 2008, Ministry for Government and Administration Reform: Oslo.Google Scholar
- Papacharissi, Z., The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as Public Sphere. New Media and Society, 2002. 4(1): p. 9--27.Google Scholar
- Gimmler, A., Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 2001. 27(4): p. 21--39.Google Scholar
- Yates, J. and W. J. Orlikowski, Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media. The Academy of Management Review, 1992. 17(2): p. 299--326.Google Scholar
- Orlikowski, W. J. and J. Yates, Genre Repetoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994. 39(4): p. 541--74.Google Scholar
- Shepherd, M. and C. Watters. The evolution of cybergenres. in System Sciences, 1998., Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on. 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dahlberg, L., The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 2001. 4(4): p. 615--633.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J., The Public Sphere, in Jürgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A reader, S. Seidman, Editor 1989, Beacon Press: Boston.Google Scholar
- Frazer, E., The Problem of Communitarian Politics. Unity and Conflict1999, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Castells, M., The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2008. 616(1): p. 78--93.Google Scholar
- Merriman, J., A history of modern Europe: From the French Revolution to the Present. Vol. 2. 1996, New York: W.W Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeoise society1991, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Webster, F., Information Management and Manipulation: Jürgen Habermas and the Decline of the Public Sphere, in Theories of the Information Society1995, Routledge: London.Google Scholar
- Dahlgren, P., The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication, 2005. 22: p. 147--162.Google Scholar
- Poster, M., Cyberdemocracy: The Internet and the Public Sphere, in Internet Culture, D. Porter, Editor 1997, Routledge: New York/London.Google Scholar
- Gibson, R. K., W. Lusoli, and S. Ward, Online Participation in the UK: Testing a 'Contextualised' Model of Internet Effects1. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 2005. 7(4): p. 561--583.Google Scholar
- Tewksbury, D., The Seeds of Audience Fragmentation: Specialization in the Use of Online News Sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2005. 49(3): p. 332--348.Google Scholar
- Calhoun, C., Community without Propinquity Revisited: Communications Technology and the Transformation of the Urban Public Sphere. Sociological Inquiry, 1998. 68(3): p. 373--397.Google Scholar
- Muhlberger, P., Human Agency and the Revitalization of the Public Sphere. Political Communication, 2005. 22(2): p. 163--178.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J., Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research1. Communication Theory, 2006. 16(4): p. 411--426.Google Scholar
- Trenz, H. and K. Eder, The Democratizing Dynamics of a European Public Sphere. European Journal of Social Theory, 2004. 7(1): p. 5--25.Google Scholar
- Johannessen, M. R., Social Capital and the Networked Public Sphere: Implications for Political Social Media sites, in The Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-45)2012: Maui, Hawaii, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Putnam, R. D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community2000, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Svendsen, G. T. and G. L. H. Svendsen, Social Kapital - en introduktion2006, København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
- Ahuja, S., M. A. Pèrez-Quiñones, and A. Kavanaugh, Local conversations 2.0, in Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Social Networks: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government2009, Digital Government Society of North America. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yang, S., H. Lee, and S. Kurnia, Social Capital in Information and Communications Technology Research: Past, Present and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2009. 25: p. 183--221.Google Scholar
- Ellison, N. B., C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe, The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007. 12(4): p. 1143--1168.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pasek, J., E. More, and D. Romer, Realizing the Social Internet? Online Social Networking meets Offline Civic Engagement. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 2009. 6(3&4): p. 197--215.Google Scholar
- Turnšek, M., "The Digital Youth Revolt?" Young People and eParticipation, in Understanding eParticipation: Contemporary PhD eParticipation research in Europe, A. Avdic, et al., Editors. 2008, Örebro University Library: Örebro.Google Scholar
- Päivärinta, T. and Ø. Sæbø, The Genre System Lens on E-Democracy. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2008. 20(2).Google Scholar
- Sæbø, Ø., Understanding Twitter Use among Parliament Representatives: A Genre Analysis, in Electronic Participation, E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, and H. de Bruijn, Editors. 2011, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. p. 1--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sæbø, Ø. and T. Päivârinta, Autopoietic cybergenres for e-Democracy? Genre analysis of a web-based discussion board, in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johannessen, M., Genres of Participation in Social Networking Systems: A Study of the 2009 Norwegian Parliamentary Election, in Electronic Participation, E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, and O. Glassey, Editors. 2010, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. p. 104--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yoshioka, T., et al., Genre taxonomy: A knowledge repository of communicative actions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 2001. 19(4): p. 431--456. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yates, J. and W. Orlikowski, Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction through Communicative Norms. Journal of Business Communication, 2002. 39(1): p. 13--35.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, B. and J. Maxwell, Evaluating the Organizational Impact of Healthcare Information Systems, in Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems, J. Anderson and C. Aydin, Editors. 2005, Springer New York. p. 30--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marshall, C. and G. Rossman, Designing Qualitative Researh: 3rd Edition1999, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Benbasat, I., D. K. Goldstein, and M. Mead, The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 1987. 11(3): p. 369--386. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cresswell, J. W., Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods approach2009, Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Walsham, G., Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 2006. 15(3): p. 320--330.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Genres of communication in activist eParticipation: a comparison of new and old media
Recommendations
Genres of Participation in Social Networking Systems: A Study of the 2021 Norwegian Parliamentary Election
Electronic ParticipationAbstracteParticipation covers a range of activities, from online voting to deliberation. In this paper, I examine the activity called e-campaigning, political parties use of digital channels during election campaigns. Norwegian political parties have used ...
Genres of participation in social networking systems: a study of the 2009 Norwegian parliamentary election
ePart'10: Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP WG 8.5 international conference on Electronic participationIn the Norwegian context, eParticipation in the form of online campaigning has been on the agenda since 2001. After Obama's successful presidential campaign in 2008, expectations about the use of SNS in the Norwegian parliamentary election were high.
...
Genres of Participation in Social Networking Systems: A Study of the 2017 Norwegian Parliamentary Election
Electronic ParticipationAbstractNorwegian political parties have used the Internet for campaigning since 2001. In 2009 all the parties represented in parliament experimented with social media, and in 2013 social media had become an important and integrated part of the ...
Comments