skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466477acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social media and the police: tweeting practices of british police forces during the August 2011 riots

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

With this paper we take a first step to understand the appropriation of social media by the police. For this purpose we analyzed the Twitter communication by the London Metropolitan Police (MET) and the Greater Manchester Police (GMP) during the riots in August 2011. The systematic comparison of tweets demonstrates that the two forces developed very different practices for using Twitter. While MET followed an instrumental approach in their communication, in which the police aimed to remain in a controlled position and keep a distance to the general public, GMP developed an expressive approach, in which the police actively decreased the distance to the citizens. In workshops and interviews, we asked the police officers about their perspectives, which confirmed the identified practices. Our study discusses benefits and risks of the two approaches and the potential impact of social media on the evolution of the role of police in society.

References

  1. Bunt, H. The DIT++ taxonomy for functional dialogue markup. Proc. AMAAS'09 Workshop: Towards a Standard Markup Language for Embodied Dialogue Acts (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. CBC News. Getting to the root of the U.K. riots. (2011) http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/08/09/f-ukriots-faq.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chermak, S. and Weiss, A. Maintaining legitimacy using external communication strategies: An analysis of police-media relations. J. of Criminal Justice, 33,(2005).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Child, J. and Rodrigues, S. B. How organizations engage with external complexity: A political action perspective. Organization Studies, 32(6), (2011), 803--824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Coleman, A. Twitter at the heart of communities. (2011) http://connectedcops.net/?p=3931Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Denef, S., Kaptein, N., Bayerl, P. S., et al. ICT Trends in European Policing. The COMPOSITE Project. (2011) http://www.fit.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/fit/de/documents/composite_d41.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dourish, P. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. The MIT Press (2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Greater Manchester Police. A day in the life of GMP on Twitter. (2010) http://youtu.be/aulazCNbaDQGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Guy, M, Earle, P, Ostrum, C, Gruchalla, K & Horvath, S. Integration and Dissemination of Citizen Reported and Seismically Derived Earthquake Information via Social Network Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis IX, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6065, (2010), 42--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Haewoon Kwak, Hyunwoo Chun, and Sue Moon. Fragile online relationship: a first look at unfollow dynamics in Twitter. In Proc. of CHI'11, ACM (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Halliday M. A. K. Learning how to mean. Edward Arnold (1975).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Herbert, S. Tangled up in blue. Conflicting paths to police legitimacy. Critical Criminology, 10(4), (2006), 481--504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hughes, A., L. Palen, J. Sutton, S. Liu, & S. Vieweg. "Site-Seeing" in disaster: An examination of on-line social convergence. In Proc. ISCRAM'08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hughes, M. and Sanchez R. London riots: Met chief Tim Godwin considered shutting off Twitter. (2011) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8704239/London-riots-Met-chief-Tim-Godwin-considered-shuttingoff-Twitter.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mendoza, M., Poblete, B. and Castillo, C. Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we RT? 1st Workshop on Social Media Analytics SOMA '10 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Murphy, K., Hinds, L., and Fleming, J. Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society, 18(2), (2008), 136--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Qu, Y., Wu, P. and Wang, X. Online Community Response to Major Disaster: A Case Study of Tianya Forum in the 2008 China Earthquake. In Proc 42nd Hawaii Int'l Conf. on System Sciences, (2009), 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Reuters. Riots to cost over $200 million - ABI (2011) http://reut.rs/peJcRxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Slater, S. Social media to the rescue When disaster strikes. (2011) http://connectedcops.net/?p=4650Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Starbird, K, Palen, L, Hughes, A and Vieweg, S. Chatter on the red: What hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information. In Proc. of CSCW'10 (2010), 241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Starbird, K. and Palen, L. (2011). "Voluntweeters": Self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In Proc. CHI'11, ACM Press (2011), 1071--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edition. Sage (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Suchman, L. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge Univ. Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sumpter, S. Police on Twitter. (2011) http://www.latentexistence.me.uk/police-on-twitter/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. The Mirror. London riots: More than 2,000 people arrested over disorder. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/london-riots-more-than-2000-people-185548Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomas, J. C. and Kellog, W. A. The Necessity of Expressive Communication in Organizations. (2001). http://www.truthtable.com/ExpressiveCommunicationBuildsMutualTrust.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tyler, T. R. and Fagan, J. Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State J. of Criminal Law, 6, (2008), 231--271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Vieweg, S, Hughes, A, Starbird, K, & Palen, L. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: What Twitter May Contribute to Situational Awareness. In Proc of CHI'10, ACM Press (2010), 1079--1088. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Social media and the police: tweeting practices of british police forces during the August 2011 riots

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader