Promoting Hotkey use through rehearsal with ExposeHK

ABSTRACT

Keyboard shortcuts allow fast interaction, but they are known to be infrequently used, with most users relying heavily on traditional pointer-based selection for most commands. We describe the goals, design, and evaluation of ExposeHK, a new interface mechanism that aims to increase hotkey use. ExposeHK's four key design goals are: 1) enable users to browse hotkeys; 2) allow non-expert users to issue hotkey commands as a physical rehearsal of expert performance; 3) exploit spatial memory to assist non-expert users in identifying hotkeys; and 4) maximise expert performance by using consistent shortcuts in a flat command hierarchy. ExposeHK supports these objectives by displaying hotkeys overlaid on their associated commands when a modifier key is pressed. We evaluated ExposeHK in three empirical studies using toolbars, menus, and a tabbed \'18ribbon' toolbar. Results show that participants used more hotkeys, and used them more often, with ExposeHK than with other techniques; they were faster with ExposeHK than with either pointing or other hotkey methods; and they strongly preferred ExposeHK. Our research shows that ExposeHK can substantially improve the user's transition from a \'18beginner mode' of interaction to a higher level of expertise.

References

1. Alexander, J. Understanding and Improving Navigation Within Electronic Documents. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New-Zealand, 2009.
2. Appert, C., and Zhai, S. Using strokes as command shortcuts: cognitive bene\'01ts and toolkit support. CHI '09, ACM, 2289--2298.
3. Bailly, G., Lecolinet, E., and Nigay, L. Flower menus: a new type of marking menu with large menu breadth, within groups and ef\'01cient expert mode memorization. AVI '08, ACM, 15--22.
4. Bau, O., and Mackay, W. Octopocus: a dynamic guide for learning gesture-based command sets. UIST '08, ACM, 37--46.
5. Bhavnani, S. K., and John, B. E. The strategic use of complex computer systems. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 15, 2 (Sept. 2000), 107--137.
6. Callahan, J., Hopkins, D., Weiser, M., and Shneiderman, B. An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear menus. CHI '88, ACM, 95--100.
7. Card, S., Moran, T., and Newell, A. The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Commun. ACM 23 (July 1980), 396--410.
8. Card, S., Newell, A., and Moran, T. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., 1983.
9. Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. Paradox of the active user. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987, 80--111.
10. Cockburn, A., and Gutwin, C. A predictive model of human performance with scrolling and hierarchical lists. HumanComputer Interaction 24, 3 (2009), 273--314.
11. Common commands in speech recognition. http://windows.microsoft.com/en-NZ/windows-vista/ Common-commands-in-Speech-Recognition.
12. Grossman, T., Dragicevic, P., and Balakrishnan, R. Strategies for accelerating on-line learning of hotkeys. CHI '07, ACM, 1591--1600.
13. Hart, S., and Staveland, L. Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human mental workload, Elsevier, 139--183.
14. Hornof, A. Visual search and mouse-pointing in labeled versus unlabeled two-dimensional visual hierarchies. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 8, 3 (Sept. 2001), 171--197.
15. Howes, A., Payne, S. J., and Woodward, A. The trouble with shortcuts. CHI '00 Extended Abstracts, CHI EA '00, ACM, 267--268.
16. Jorgensen, A., Garde, A., Laursen, B., and Jensen, B. Using mouse and keyboard under time pressure: Preference, strategies and learning. Behaviour & Information Technology 21, 5 (2002), 317--319.
17. Krisler, B., and Alterman, R. Training towards mastery: overcoming the active user paradox. NordiCHI '08, ACM, 239--248.
18. Kurtenbach, G., and Buxton, W. Issues in combining marking and direct manipulation techniques. UIST '91, ACM, 137--144.
19. Kurtenbach, G. P. The design and evaluation of marking menus. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1993.
20. Lane, D., Napier, A., Peres, C., and Sandor, A. The Hidden Costs of Graphical User Interfaces: The Failure to Make the Transition from Menus and Icon Tool Bars to Keyboard Shortcuts. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 18 (2005), 133--144.
21. Mac os x human interfaces guidelines. https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/ UserExperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/Intro/Intro.html.
22. Matejka, J., Li, W., Grossman, T., and Fitzmaurice, G. Communitycommands: command recommendations for software applications. UIST '09, ACM, 193--202.
23. Miller, C. S., Denkov, S., and Omanson, R. C. Categorization costs for hierarchical keyboard commands. CHI '11, ACM, 2765--2768.
24. Odell, D., Davis, R., Smith, A., and Wright, P. Toolglasses, marking menus, and hotkeys: a comparison of one and two-handed command selection techniques. GI '04, 17--24.
25. Peres, C., Tamborello, F., Fleetwood, M., Chung, P., and Paige-smith, D. Keyboard shortcut usage: The roles of social factors and computer experience. HFES '04, 803--807.
26. Poulton, E., and Freeman, P. Unwanted asymmetrical transfer effects with balanced experimental designs. Psychological Bulletin 66, 1 (1966).
27. Quinn, P., and Cockburn, A. The effects of menu parallelism on visual search and selection. AUIC '08, Australian Computer Society, 79--84.
28. Rekimoto, J., Ishizawa, T., Schwesig, C., and Oba, H. Presense: interaction techniques for \'01nger sensing input devices. UIST '03, ACM, 203--212.
29. Richardson, J. T. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review 6, 2 (2011), 135--147.
30. Scarr, J., Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., and Bunt, A. Improving command selection with commandmaps. CHI '12, ACM, 257--266.
31. Scarr, J., Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., and Quinn, P. Dips and ceilings: understanding and supporting transitions to expertise in user interfaces. CHI' 11, ACM, 2741--2750.
32. Schmidt, R. A., and Lee, T. D. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, vol. 3. Human Kinetics, 2005.
33. Schneider, W., and Chein, J. Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science 27, 3 (2003), 525--559.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)